Of course they didn’t ask any of the important questions. The first one that comes to mind is whether or not the police they expose in this segment were muslim (‘Asian’) or not because I think that is critical in terms of understanding the nature of the threat.
Sexual Assault Referral Centre, SARG. Puts you in mind of various other acronyms and initialisms. GULAG. CHEKA. UNRWA. SMERSH. COMINTERN. SLORC.
SARC, oops. I’m not sure that’s actually better.
You can’t rely on the BBC to give an accurate and honest account of the child grooming gangs.If a non muslim had commited such crimes they would be named straight away,yet when a muslim does such things their names are withheld until some months later.So,whenever you see a crime reported on the BBC and it doesn’t name the offender but just says”a man is being held”etc,etc,you know that the culprit is a muslim.Check so many months down the line,and you will discover you were right.Their other favourite is to call them “asians”………
The metaphorical malignant cancer of Musloomania is still the subject of PC poison .
You are right the public needs to know if the police who aren’t doing their jobs are Moslems or not, are they helping fellow religious fanatics or are they PC cowards.
Or are they on the take?
Some are, some are afraid of being non PC , some are Moslems covering for their coreligionists and some are “just following orders”. I can remember a time when the vast majority of police officers in the US, Canada and Britain would have refused to cover up sex crimes.
Could be all of the above, including Babs’ suggestion.