Britain, Italy hold out Gaddafi exile prospect

Apparently Gaddafi is a bad enough guy that the UN will bomb this piss out of him but his crimes are not bad enough for an arrest.

If Gaddafi is allowed to go into exile how much of Libyas weath will go with him and if this happens how much money from the taxpayers of the west be required to “rebuild” and “stabalize” Libya?


LONDON (Reuters) – More than 40 governments and international bodies gathered in London on Tuesday to plan for a Libya without Muammar Gaddafi, with Italy and Britain suggesting he might be allowed to go into exile.

With fighting raging between rebels and Gaddafi loyalists, Italy has put forward a proposal for a political deal to end Libya’s crisis, including a quick ceasefire, exile for Gaddafi and dialogue between rebels and tribal leaders.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague also implied exile might be a way to take Gaddafi out of the picture and settle the six-week-old uprising against his 40 years in power.

“We want him to leave power and that’s what we’ve consistently said to the Libyan regime. We are not in control, of course, of where he might go,” Hague told the BBC, adding he believed Gaddafi should face the International Criminal Court.

Britain and France led the push for a muscular intervention in the Libyan conflict and coalition air strikes have helped rebels in the east of the country to advance but questions remain about the end game in Libya.

Tuesday’s meeting, starting at 1300 GMT (9 a.m. ET) and due to end with a news conference at 1630 GMT, is expected to set up a high-level steering group, including Arab states, to provide political guidance for the international response to Libya.

Attendees include U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, NATO leader Anders Fogh Rasmussen and Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani, as well as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and 40 other foreign ministers.


The meeting will discuss stepping up humanitarian aid to war-torn areas and call for a political process to enable Libyans to choose their own future, British officials said.

Hague held talks before the start of the conference with Mahmoud Jebril, a member of the rebel Libyan National Council, whom he had invited to London.

Clinton was also scheduled to meet Jebril before the conference as U.S. officials gave a positive assessment of rebel advances on the battlefield.

“They’ve clearly recovered a lot of momentum, both militarily and politically. They’ve covered a lot of ground,” one senior U.S. administration official said.

The U.S. official said Clinton and Jebril may discuss further moves to release $33 billion in frozen Libyan assets to the opposition, although he gave no further details.

U.S. President Barack Obama vowed on Monday to work with allies to hasten the day when Gaddafi leaves power but said he would not use force to remove him. Hague also said Britain was not pursuing regime change.

However, French Defense Minister Gerard Longuet said Britain and France were demanding Gaddafi’s departure.

Asked what would be “Mission Accomplished,” Longuet told France Inter radio: “When the Libyan people are able to express themselves without being repressed.”

Coalition air strikes against Gaddafi’s forces have worried some countries, with Russia saying that the action goes beyond what was authorized by the United Nations. Russia will not be attending the London meeting, a British official said.

A ComRes poll for the Independent newspaper found seven out of 10 Britons were concerned action in Libya could result in forces being sucked into a long Iraq-style conflict.

5 Replies to “Britain, Italy hold out Gaddafi exile prospect”

  1. The ruling class of Europe don’t want to set the precedent of trying rulers and either executing them or sending them to prison, thus they are resorting to the exile that Napoleon was sent into.

  2. If Gaddafi doesn’t have an “out”, they has no choice other than to fight on. If his options are to choose between “war and live” vs. “war and die”, obviously, he will choose war and fight like a tiger. If you add in a third option of “cushy exile in the West”, then the option for no war becomes not only possible, but an attractive one.

    But the war there has definite tribal elements to it, so I don’t think Gaddafi will abandon his tribe, no matter what is on offer, if he fears the easterners will come in an destroy the western half of Libya.

  3. If Gaddafi is given exile the west will discover it was a big mistake, but the entire intervention is a big mistake. The government that is going to replace Gaddafi is going to be much worse then he is.

  4. I agree with you Richard. If they give Gadaffi exile it seems that he will be given the choice of where to go. Then the west will have a very angry, rich and powerful man financing terror with a vengance.

  5. Kadhafi can choose the country if they give him exile since he had very good relationships with many world leaders. However, I am afraid that the Libyan people will experience some hard times because they will want to make their own choices but the military presence of other countries will remain in Libya. They should avoid repeating the mistake made after the Guld war when the responsibilities were put in the hands of Iraqis and Sadam Hussein availed himself of the opportunity and gained back all his powers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *