It is very important to understand the mechanisms under what we are fed as “information” today.
What we are experiencing is NOT “two tier policing”. Nor is it “Hypocrisy. It is a well laid out blueprint by the UN, EU, WEF, Bilderberg people etc. etc. Who Stephen Coughlin refers to as, “The powers that be” or PTB.
Start with this RAIR article on some of the solid evidences of this. below, a few more examples that really should be a slam dunk for the case. We all see these examples every day all over social media. What we are asking for here, is for people to see it differently in order to come to an actual understanding of the cause, rather than just an endless amount of rage and frustration from seeing its result.
1. The story below represents two separate Lines of Effort. The communist one to deracinate Western identity and individualism. But also the Islamic one to replace Western Rule of law and equality with sharia and Islamic supremacy.
Here is Grok’s explanation of the post, as I was not familiar with this tradition and needed context on this event:
Tommy Robinson criticizes the arrest of a 56-year-old man in Moygashel, Northern Ireland, after a replica mosque and signs reading “Secure our borders” and “End the threat of radical Islam” were placed on a large loyalist bonfire ahead of July 12th commemorations marking the Battle of the Boyne.
Police detained the man under Article 9 of the Public Order (NI) Order 1987 for suspected display of material intended to stir up hatred, with the PSNI confirming the action amid widespread condemnation from politicians and church leaders.
The post and replies frame the incident as disproportionate policing of political protest during traditional unionist bonfire season, contrasting it with other controversial displays that have not led to similar enforcement.
2. De facto sharia:
3. Unrelated really, but someone should make a movie Kind about. this.
We all know the facts. The guy who threw the rock would never face an hour in jail or a day in court. The guy who took retribution might have his life completely destroyed based on the laws as they are written, and the law as it is now deployed, which is what this post is about.
So how bad are things really when people are ready to risk the consequences of the unfairness of the system to deal with these matters themselves?
4. How much time do you think he will actually serve, and will it deter him from his goals?
5. The swapping out of Rule of Law for Sharia appears to be moving from the Commonwealth to the USA now
On that subject, read RAIR Foundation. They are the most up to date on the Islamification of the United States.
Thank you all for checking out this site.
A couple of sorta random data points:
Readers?
Hydrocarbon shortages affect public confidence. Confidence shaken affects precious metals. Hormuz is talking:
https://youtu.be/J48uvL1Ud9Q?si=ur-Up0CSVLgvizTh
3- Head kicking can result in attempted murder charges. Do avoid when possible. I will release a free audio file for those who wish to download for their own self-defense so to avoid such possibility. It is much more effective than any head kick. It is of my ex-wife telling me about her day. This will cause an eruption beginning in the brain stem, traveling up through the Temporal lobe, into the Frontal lobe, then finally blowing out through the skull in front of the Frontal lobe, terminating the Tard assailant. I especially recommend this recording to those of Jewish extraction because of their enhanced odds of suffering such violence, but it works for anyone. Even playing the recording at medium volume has proven highly effective–now regularly used by the IDF. Walk with confidence.
I realize you’re joking, but I was about the post the same comment about head-kicking. Apart from the possible charges, it can actually result in permanent neurological damage or death. So instead of attempted manslaughter you might appear before the judge for actual manslaughter.
Of course, the kid in the video was an ass. But be careful when you get physical.. especially when dealing with a minor.
#5.
Also in different states now they are forcing the reading of the bible, state legislatures are declaring Christ is King, like you said throwing out the rule of law.
USA was built on religious liberty, freedom of conscience, which in practice is seperation of church and state, and we are seeing that erode away even further with this Trump presidency. Actually Trump has basically removed that separation of church and state, just hasn’t enacted any religious laws yet to complete that process, and Islamists are being used to complete this process. Hegelian Dialectic.
The Jesuits use the the Islamists, among other things, to get the American people to actually want to disregard the principles of the constitution and combine church and state for their cause. Americians would not have wanted to combine church and state without an antithesis.
I think I have brought this to attention on here over the past 6+ years. Eventually you guys will see it.
Separation of Church and State means no official State Church. It doesn’t take much study of history to learn this. It doesn’t mean no religion or that Preachers can’t preach about current political issues.
Yes it includes no official state church.
I dont know what you mean by “no religion”.
Yes , it doesn’t mean that pastors can’t preach on political issues, it does mean they shall not endorse a candidate. Johnson amendment I think, for obvious reasons.
I haven’t received an email for follow up comments for a few years. I need to return to a comment to see if there is a response. Thats why such a delay here.
No where in the Founding Documents or the Documents written in support of or against the Founding Documents do you find the wording “separation of Church and State”. This was written by Thomas Jefferson while he was Governor of Virginia and was fighting against the establishment of an official Church Virginia.
Our Founding Fathers were either Christians or Deitist, they founded the US based on the moral code of the Old and New Testaments and used them for the foundation of our legal code. Reading the Bible as a historical document that was used to found our legal system is a legitimate scholastic tool to teach the kids where the ideas we support came from.
I never said in my comment that “separation of Church and State” was in the founding documents, what I did say was “USA was built on religious liberty, freedom of conscience, which in practice is seperation of church and state,”.
Here are some quotes I came across:
The metaphor of creating a wall of separation between the church and the state was first written by
Roger Williams in a reply to John Cotton in 1644, and then reproduced and expanded upon in his mag-
num opus, The Bloudy Tenent of Persecution, for Cause of Conscience, published in London in the
same year. Parliament banned the book. The metaphor was well known to the founding fathers, prob3 –
ably through the works of James Burgh, raised a Scottish Presbyterian who later became a devout
Protestant dissenter. Thomas Jefferson’s letter was not first quoted by the Supreme Court in 1947, but
rather 68 years earlier in 1879 in the case of Reynolds v. United States. The Commission ignores a long
line of Presidents who felt compelled to explicitly support the concept of a wall of separation. Besides
Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, one of the primary drafters of the Constitution, said that there
should be a “separation between religion and government,” and that religion flourished better without4
government patronage. George Washington’s diplomats negotiated, and John Adams signed the Treaty
of Tripoli, which stated that “the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense,
founded on the Christian religion.” President Fillmore said that “Church and state should be separate,6
not only in form, but fact. Religion and politics should not be mingled.” President Grant said, “Keep7
the church and the state forever separate.” President Garfield said that it would be dangerous to use8
public funds for religious schools and that “The separation of the Church and the State in everything
relating to taxation should be absolute.” President Theodore Roosevelt said there must be “complete9
severance of Church and State.”10
In attacking the Supreme Court decisions of the 1940s, the Commission resorts to two tactics that can-
not survive scrutiny: a personal attack on Justice Hugo Black, and claims of philosophical influence
that the timeline of history makes impossible. The Commission states “Even a few Supreme Court
decisions seemed to track with this train of thought [defined earlier in the report as that of Nietzsche,
Foucault, Sartre, and the belief that ‘God is dead’], culminating in a 1947 opinion [Everson], in which
Justice Hugo Black, a former Ku Klux Klan member, repurposed a metaphor coined by Thomas Jeffer-
son in an attempt to legitimize the new critical philosophy by placing it in the constitutional tradition.
Specifically, the Supreme Court ruled on a series of decisions in which it used the ‘wall’ metaphor to
regulate a child’s access to religious education and later to ban school prayer and public displays of re-
ligion (like the Ten Commandments).” Report at 41-42. Without any support for the notion that Justice
Black wrote opinions in accordance with the anti-Catholic philosophies of the Klan, the Commission
attempts to persuade the public that Justice Black was racist and that his opinions should be disregard-
3 Roger Williams, Mr. Cotton’s Letter Lately Printed, Examined and Answered (1644), in The Complete Writings3
of Roger Williams, vol. 1, p. 108; the metaphor is reproduced and developed throughout The Bloudy Tenent of
Persecution, for Cause of Conscience, ed. Edward Bean Underhill (London: Hanserd Knollys Society, 1848),
see, e.g., p. 435.
James Madison, “Detached Memoranda” (c. 1817), in Elizabeth Fleet, “Madison’s ‘Detached Memoranda,’”4
William and Mary Quarterly 3 (1946): 534–568.
Madison’s Letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822.5
___________________________________________________________________________________
PillarofFreedom.org | co*****@*************om.org
2065 Bluebird Ln, Redlands, CA 92374
Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and the Bey and Subjects of Tripoli of Barbary, art.6
11, signed Nov. 4, 1796; ratified by the U.S. Senate June 7, 1797; proclaimed by President John Adams June 10,
1797 (Barlow translation).
The Ovation to Mr. Fillmore: Speeches of Mr. Fillmore, 1856.7
Ulysses S. Grant, Address to the Society of the Army of the Tennessee, Des Moines, Iowa, Sept. 29, 1875.8
James A. Garfield, Letter Accepting the Republican Presidential Nomination (to Hon. George F. Hoar), July 12,9
1880.
Theodore Roosevelt, Fear God and Take Your Own Part (New York: George H. Doran, 1916), 361; the state10 –
ment originated in T. Roosevelt’s 1915 public letter opposing public funding of sectarian schools in New York
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13wd1AsF3m6STwD-v0ywpXFYnI-VRv8TF/view
https://pillaroffreedom.org/
Reports are she was strangled on top of hits to her head. If they don’t find a fingerprint on her neck, he might just get away with it.
#4 Absolute scum. Sounds like he was born in the UK, so no deportation probably.