Britain: plans for mosque at Sandhurst thrown out

From The Daily Mail U.K.

Battle of the Minarets: Surrey residents say a Mosque at Sandhurst is an act of provocation, their critics say they are racist

By Sue Reid
Last updated at 12:14 AM on 12th March 2010

Victory was being celebrated yesterday in the leafy avenues and Victorian villas of Camberley.

In a triumph for local democracy, a plan to build a huge £3 million mosque with two 100ft minarets, which would have been visible from Sandhurst Royal Military Academy, was thrown out on Wednesday night by the town’s councillors.

A thousand people from the affluent Surrey town queued to get into the meeting, some waiting for hours from 9am to get in.

4 Replies to “Britain: plans for mosque at Sandhurst thrown out”

  1. “In return, the mosque’s supporters accused them of being racist and hostile to the Islamic way of life.” Always the same old arguments. Islam is not a race. And what is wrong in being opposed to a totalitarian ideology? I admit that I am hostile to Islam. That is a fact but not an argument. The argument is WHY I am hostile to Islam. The people are waking up at last and resisting. Pushback time has come. Another victory for ourselves.

  2. Newalbion, mahound-enablers, for lack of arguments in favor of their unconditional and complete surrender to mahound (they won’t openly admit that their aim is to destroy the West, will they?), will always say that anyone opposed to the islamization/opensewerization of Western nations is a “racist.”

    I hope people on our side will eventually manage to make the truth that mahoundianism isn’t a race sound louder than the lies peddled by dhimmis hell-bent on our destruction. The baselessness of their claims about racism to defend islam, which can be easily debunked but are still always used to end the debate on the subject, should be more aggressively exposed for their utter bogusness and dishonesty. At the same time that it’s too bad that such open debate will hardly ever be allowed by mainstream media outlets (because of the number of people that they can reach), their ever growing lack of credibility might end up making that no longer necessary eventually. People fed up with their lies have and will look elsewhere for credible information.

  3. quote
    ‘The Bengali Association says it may well appeal the decision.

    Their arrogance is quite sickening, what’s our country coming to?

    Winston Churchill on Islam
    ‘No stronger retrograde force exists in the world’

  4. Imagine this nightmare scenario:-

    I write a Book that I say is sacred because it is The Almighty’s will…hence the Book cannot be challenged (because it is sacred!) and that it is an entire and sufficient document for ruling any society – so no other system, secular or religious, will be tolerated. Moreover – because it is sacred – the Book cannot in any way be altered, or amended by mankind.

    However, I interpret the Book as commanding me to subjugate the world under a universal Bookist regime and that, in doing so, I can kill any and all who oppose me – right down to women and children because, as Infidels (non-Bookists), they have no right to exist.

    Further, I state that existing adherents to my creed who change their minds must be killed immediately as apostates.

    I now urge my followers to start burning all mosques, temples or other non-Book places of worship.
    I ban sales of the Koran and other non-Book works and I prosecute any attempt to ‘convert’ existing Bookists – by calling it blasphemy – because my system derives directly from God’s will (so I say).

    I advocate death for adultery and for homosexuality and I demand the domestic subjugation of women.

    Indeed, I pass laws (based on the Book, of course) that, in a secular sense, make non-Bookists into second-class citizens with few rights…does all this sound familiar?

    So, are you going to supinely accept the Rule of The Book…or have me Sectioned and confined to Broadmoor?

    Ah, you guessed – I’m an agnostic.