Simon Platt made this comment:
Some mistakes here.
It’s not a new law. It dates from, er, 1984. We all – nearly all – missed it before now.
If what this fellow cites is accurate, it won’t lead to mandatory vaccination. First, you don’t give vaccines to people who already have the disease. Secondly, I would argue that vaccines are not medication. But I don’t know the legal position.
That doesn’t mean it’s not a bad law, or that we need not be on our guard for something even worse. But we shouldn’t be distracted by this.
Some mistakes here.
It’s not a new law. It dates from, er, 1984. We all – nearly all – missed it before now.
If what this fellow cites is accurate, it won’t lead to mandatory vaccination. First, you don’t give vaccines to people who already have the disease. Secondly, I would argue that vaccines are not medication. But I don’t know the legal position.
That doesn’t mean it’s not a bad law, or that we need not be on our guard for something even worse. But we shouldn’t be distracted by this.
There is no vaccines for any type of corona viruses. The pharma industry got lots of money for developing a vaccine for corona viruses…but they never managed to do it.
So…what vaccines are we talking about ? What do they do ? They claim that we must be forced to get vaccines because of this corona virus…but there is no vaccine for corona virus.
p.s.
Vlad,
again the malware warning.
They have updated and amended items in the act go read it