How deceptive (and therefore evil) is Twitter?

I attempted to post out a link with translated German MSM videos about the murder of a woman in Limburg by a muslim man, born in Germany to Tunisian parents.

Of course, any connection between Islam and the actions it demands of its adherents is to be suppressed at the greatest cost of all. The truth and safety of all else in the world.

When a follower attempted to retweet my post, she was met with the following:

When she tried to retweet she Got the following message: (Danish) “This request could look like it is automated. In order to protect our users against spam and other nefarious activity, we currently cannot process this request. Try again later”.

I noticed for that day I had no notifications at all, and since then, very very few. Clearly Twitter has some kind of brake they can put on people’s accounts so that various functions report dishonestly and or are manipulated so that it gets less readers than have subscribed, or would see it otherwise.

This in itself is of concern of course, But the deceptive nature of how it is done should concern us all.

Despite this, Twitter manages to be of some utility as an information portal. But imagine what it would be like if it was an honest platform that functions as we are duped into believing it is.

Most of the world’s problems today would be solved and by peaceful means one can easily project. After all, inform people, they vote well as a general rule and far leftist extremists would stay on the margins till they grew out of it. Usually thats a few months into their first dishwashing job.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

One Reply to “How deceptive (and therefore evil) is Twitter?”

  1. If it were an honest platform the Zuck would be much richer but wouldn’t have as much control and he seems to thrive on the control.