LIVE: Count Dankula Verdict: GUILTY

At this time I would like to add a thought of my own.

If ever there was an event designed to create real Jew-hatred and possible actions against Jewish people, it was this.

The fact that ZERO Jews complained about this guy or his video, the fact that it was high profile Jewish people who defended him publicly, will mean nothing to the masses.

All many people will see is that this man is going to jail for ‘offending Jews’. And will it be the communists/socialists who will pay the price for this misperception? No? Well guess who it will be then.

Sentencing will be in about an hour from mow, 14:00 UK time.

At the moment I only have one comment. There should be only one person involved celebrating this verdict, and that would be Count Dankula himself, if, as he says, he is an actual communist, as this is 100% a socialist verdict. It is the full abandonment of rule of law and protection of rights in favour of however a judge or the court views social cohesion. So as a communist he should be thrilled.

For the rest of us, this is a tragedy of next level proportions.

I will be updating this with some videos of people who have not been to court, found guilty, or even been arrested.

UPDATE: THE SENTENCE: (Could be up to 6 months)

UPDATE: A commenter let it be known that Count Dankula is NOT a communist and uses that claim to troll leftists. In any case, the observation about this being a defacto communist inspired verdict remains true. But it sickens and shocks me that this person, who seems a regular fellow by any standards but wittier and braver than most, is becoming a free-speech martyr.

And Canada is heading the same way and for the same reasons. Precedents being set for blasphemy laws in favour of Islam. Watch.

An example which we will go in to later.

Scroll to 13 minutes

Because you cannot spell fucked without UK.

I was shopping for dog food today and was truly shocked and horrified to find bags of NAZI CHOW right out in the open in the dog food store!

Dear Mel Brooks. As many here in the comments have pointed out, it is critical that you never visit the UK again. You could be, and should be if there was any consistency at all in the tattered remains of British law, arrested on the spot and jailed for up to two years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

16 Replies to “LIVE: Count Dankula Verdict: GUILTY”

  1. Count Dankula has been given bail to apper at court for sentancing on 23/4/18 for sentancing, the court wants pre whatever reports. The poor bugger now has a month to wait before the court decides to send him down or not.
    All this on St Georges day too!

    Goto 12;50

  2. Vlad, I think it was done precisely to antagonize Westerners towards Jewish people, and it was the part two of antagonizing Eastern Europeans and Jews and the state of Israel about Nazi camps. (Poland doesn’t want to be blamed for camps put or its territory by Nazi invaders). If people reacted badly, they are fascists, which is exactly what had to be demonstrated; but also another demographic is clapping and cheering. They will be even more special and protected.

  3. I don’t think this is the same criminal code. Does it ever define “intent”? I found this by searching for the mildly offensive joke punchline “Scouser in a suit.”
    http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20111115164417/http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/prosecution/violent_extremism.html (I bolded the grossly offensive parts.)
    2. Free Speech
    When deciding whether or not to prosecute such offences, we also have to bear in mind that people have a right to freedom of speech. Free speech includes the right to offend. Indeed the courts have ruled that behaviour that is merely annoying, rude or offensive does not necessarily constitute a criminal offence.

    The offences that have been successfully prosecuted go well beyond the voicing of an opinion, free speech or causing offence.

    The distinct common thread in terms of criminal prosecutions under the radicalisation umbrella has been a manifested desire to kill, maim or cause a person or group of people immense fear for their personal safety through the threat of (often) extreme violence based on their colour or religion, and urging others to take this course.

    Prosecutions are not limited to cases of the above, however, and in addition there have been prosecutions for deeply insulting behaviour. This is behaviour which falls short of a desire to commit violence but is nevertheless threatening, abusive or insulting and intends to stir up racial hatred.

    3. Racial and Religious Hatred
    Hatred is a very strong emotion. Stirring up racial tension, opposition, even hostility may not necessarily be enough to amount to an offence. Sometimes it may be obvious that a person intends to cause racial hatred; for example, when a person makes a public speech condemning a group of people because of their race and deliberately encouraging others to turn against them and perhaps commit acts of violence. Usually, however, the evidence is not so clear-cut and we may have to rely upon people’s actions in order to prove their intentions.

    If we are not able to prove that the accused intended to stir up racial hatred, we have to show that, in all the circumstances, hatred was likely to be stirred up, not simply liable or possible.

    The offences of inciting religious hatred and incitement to hatred because of sexual orientation require the accused to intend to incite hatred.

    • “Communications Act 2003 Section 127(1) covers offensive and threatening messages sent over a “public” electronic communications network. Since 2010 it has increasingly been used to arrest and prosecute individuals for messages posted to sites such as Twitter and Facebook. Section 127(2) covers causing annoyance by sending messages known to be false, which is one of the laws that hoax-999 callers can be prosecuted under.”
      https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Communications_Act_2003/Section_127

      “Count Dankula (nazi pug)
      Police in Scotland arrested a man (Mark Meecham aka Count Dankula) in May 2016 for posting a video online of a dog making a Nazi salute (“M8 Yer Dugs A Nazi”),[31] allegedly causing gross offence.[32] He was found guilty in March 2018.[33]”

      “127 Improper use of public electronic communications network
      (1) A person is guilty of an offence if he—
      (a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or
      (b) causes any such message or matter to be so sent.
      (2) A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—
      (a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false,
      (b) causes such a message to be sent; or
      (c) persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.
      (3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both.
      (4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to anything done in the course of providing a programme service (within the meaning of the Broadcasting Act 1990 (c. 42)).”
      https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Communications_Act_2003/Section_127#Count_Dankula_.28nazi_pug.29

      As in every Communist regime, as it is under the European Human Rights Act, all citizens are first made guilty. Then the bureaucrats can decide when or not to apply the law to each class. There is no court jester.

      • “…sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character…”

        “Nothing to do with Islam… Teach infants homosexuality… The Rich are wicked”

        How many times do Socialist governments break their own laws and then imprison the smallest comedians? All the time.

  4. Eeyore,

    Since it is one of my all-time favorite comedies, I cannot thank you enough for using every last excuse to embed clips from “The Producers”.

    Rest assured that I know how you use this older media as a didactic example of the Freedom of Expression that we once had and are now losing wholesale.

    None of which subtracts one iota of pleasure from knowing how Mel Brooks tweaked America’s collective nose by ridiculing the Nazis in his movie.

    • The Brits aren’t still weighing filing charges against Canada’s CBC for posting the song? Mel Brooks might have admitted “intent” in the interview.

    • I think it is the entirety of season 4 of Larry David’s Curb Your Enthusiasm which is based on the producers and its completely hysterical. I am not a huge fan of the show, but that season is brilliant.

      If you haven’t seen it, you are in for a treat. Its the season where the theme is how Mel Brooks asks Larry David to play the main character in the Producers.

      Brilliant.

      • You’ve obviously never seen
        Historty of the world part one mate, I had to get a dvd of it from amazon.
        Well worth the cash.

        • History Part One can’t hold a candle to The Producers. There is a sheer concentration of irony and double entendre that cannot be beat. Plus, the film’s more linear plot construction makes it easier to sustain comedic instances and connections.

  5. There was a comedian in Rhodesia who had a dog called Mugabe who he used to berate on the streets, he received a harsh prison sentence for mocking the President.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*