Rape at indoor swimming pool: verdict nullified

An original translation by Nash Montana with much thanks!

From this German website:

The rape trial against a refugee from Iraq who allegedly has sexually molested and raped a ten year old boy at the Theresienbad in Vienna, has to be repeated.

The high court (OGH) on Thursday nullified the first judgment – six years prison – partly and ordered a new trial. It was decided there were flaws in the initial discovery, senate president Thomas Phillipp explained.

OGH says rape was not sufficiently proven

While the verdict in regards to severe sexual abuse of a minor were “air tight”, the guilty verdict was confirmed by the OGH in that point and is therefore legally valid, there was no necessarily required findings made that showed evidence of legally defined rape.

According to the OGH, the court should have determined if the offender thought that the victim had given his consent to the sexual activity. In other words, if the accused had shown intent to act against the will of the boy. This intent has not sufficiently enough been shown, and therefore the OGH nullified the guilty verdict for rape.

The actual rape therefore will be debated separately at county court. According to the law the punishment will be nullified, and therefore after the second court process which will probably not take place before 2017, the 20 year old will receive a new sentence. The offender will remain in detention until then.

Boy was pushed into the bathroom cabin

On December 2nd of last year the accused had allegedly raped the boy at the Theresienbad in Vienna-Melding. As the process began last April the offender admitted to grabbing the young student by the hand, pushing him into a bathroom cabin, locking the door from the inside, and then molesting the boy.

The accused had been arrested right away at the swimming pool. The boy ran to the pool supervisor who then immediately called the police. During the initial interview with the police, the 20 year old offender already made a confession and according to the recording, he said that he was “following his appetite”. That he “hadn’t had any sex for four months”. When he was asked by an officer if it wasn’t illegal even in Iraq to have sex with a ten year old boy, the refugee answered: “Such a thing is forbidden in every country of the world.”

The very youthful looking offender had been working as a taxi driver in Iraq. In September of 2013 he married his wife and they had a child shortly thereafter. In August of 2015 he decided to leave Iraq to build a new life for himself and his family.

 

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

5 Replies to “Rape at indoor swimming pool: verdict nullified”

  1. “According to the OGH, the court should have determined if the offender thought that the victim had given his consent to the sexual activity.”

    This statement means that rape of children has mitigation in Austria.

    And we’re back to Socialists.

    • All the court was asking is if the child, manufactured by their nurseries, was
      1. Homosexual
      2. Muslim
      3. She-he
      3. Non-binery gendered.

      This would determine whether the child was offended or if this was a positive experience for them handled from a very caring older Muslim in an important cultural rite of passage for when they hit the carpet.

      Something that would have happened anyway, and Western psychiatrists advise should be better experienced when very young in order to believe that they were born that way; so as to reduce resistance, rejection and having surgery in later life.

      All they want is the child’s happiness.

      So the farm is run.

      • “Seven-year-old boy ‘living life entirely as girl’ removed from mother’s care
        Youngster has been sent to live with his father following High Court ruling
        The judge said the woman had caused her son ‘significant emotional harm’
        He said the mother had been ‘absolutely convinced’ that the youngster ‘perceived himself as a girl’ and was determined that he should be a girl.

        Social workers let a mother raise her young son as a girl because they were in thrall to ‘transgender equality’.

        The boy, who was made to wear a pink hairband, dresses and nail varnish, lived ‘entirely as a girl’.

        He was registered as a girl with his doctor’s surgery and was referred to as ‘she’ in official documentation from the age of just four.

        But despite the alarm being raised by officials and the boy’s father, council staff failed to intervene.

        Details of the extraordinary case were revealed at the Family Court yesterday when a judge accused the boy’s social workers of naivety and professional arrogance.

        The seven-year-old, who cannot be identified, has been removed from his mother’s care and is living with his father in the north of England.”
        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3859618/You-caused-son-great-harm-insisting-raising-girl-Boy-seven-sent-live-father-mother-raised-daughter.html

        Rape.

  2. Count on the media to omit any reporting about how, if the victim being sodomized has no facial or pubic hair. Islam holds that such a pre-adolescent individual is not an actual “man” and the sex act is not classified as being homosexual. How else to explain the way that, some ten years ago, supposedly ultra-puritanical Taliban commanders were issued a set of 30 rules regarding personal conduct?

    The Taliban’s rules
    http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/12/06/schuster.12.6/index.html?eref=aol

    Anyone who reads the above linked CNN article should pay close attention to its glaring omission of one particular line item. Inquiring minds will have to go elsewhere for useful information. In fact, it is apparently impossible to find an intact online copy of this 2006 Taliban document.

    Trust the MSM to try and sanitize the public image of some of this world’s most ruthless terrorist killers. See: http://www.coalitionoftheswilling.net/archives/2006/12/taliban_rule_27.html

    Rule number 19 stands out in particular:

    Taliban “are not allowed to take young boys with no facial hair onto the battlefield or into their private quarters.”

    Taken together with all of the foregoing information, it’s readily apparent that Taliban have their own predilection for young bacha bazi boys. See: The filthy culture of bacha bazi in Afghanistan
    http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/29547/the-filthy-culture-of-bacha-bazi-in-afghanistan/

    Better yet, watch the video (just not on a full stomach – potentially NSFW):

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*