CNN and perversion of important concepts.

It never ceases to stun me how the largest and most influential sectors of mass media abuse important concepts for rhetorical purposes and think, or perhaps do in fact, get away with it. I think it was Goebbels who said, ‘if you tell a lie tell a huge one and you will get away with it’ or perhaps it was Hitler but in any case, CNN has decided to take that strategy and run with it no matter what.

For CNN, middle aged working people who believe in the rule of law, in the US constitution as an important document which should dictate the bases of laws in the US, of limited government power and freedom of the individual, in other words of ordinary Americans from the time of the creation of the USA to now, are extremists while a government that spends trillions of dollars without records, who seal all facts concerning the President of the USA’s own background, where the list of unprecedented seemingly anti-American actions is too long to post in one go, is the middle ground.

Add to that that the British government who now openly admits to trying to destroy a traditional England with mass immigration from Muslim nations is mainstream to CNN while a bunch of very typical British people who merely want the rule of law where rational law was invented with Magna Carta to remain, who want a genuine tolerant society based on British culture to remain in force, and who want to stop the utter transformation of traditional England into a Sharia-Islamic state where British citizens would find themselves as second class citizens in their own country with nearly none of the rights that they themselves have given even to Illegal immigrants from Muslim nations.

CNN should be on that list for the next round of Nuremberg trials if indeed we manage to get back to sanity in the western world. Someone somewhere, take down some names.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

6 Replies to “CNN and perversion of important concepts.”

  1. I wish that the average person would read this article, since it underscores what blogs like this have been fighting; the wholesale destruction of truth in the free world to appease Muslims (and by default OPEC nations that are Muslim).

    From refusing to teach about the Holocaust to secretly supplying consumers with halal meat. From the visits of (possibly Muslim) President Obama to Muslim states while avoiding Islam’s traditional enemies on world tours to the creeping introduction of sharia law all over the western world, the governments of the west are falling to political correctness and making it easier for the universal caliphate to become reality.

    Only when we stop the haj and send all those Muslims back to where they came from who refuses to assimilate to the mainstream culture wil the west ever get back on track. Only when the MSM admits to the people that Islam is a political system will the people understand how it threatens world peace, and has done so since its inception.

    I trust that the EDL and the PVV will gain strength and that the people take matters back into their own hands, just as they did during the dark days of the Blitz, as they did during the Nazi occupation of Europe and during the days when the Soviet Union fell along with its satellites.

    Its high time to call Islam a political system, and be done with it.

  2. I think he said, “Dan Rivers, CNN London”. Boy, he just can’t get enough of calling conservatives names, can he. Extreme right, racist, intolerant. And, of course, none of their motives are what they say they are, oh no, it’s all just a big front for Fascism, ’cause that’s what all conservatives really want, isn’t it. The mainstream media is just one big hatchet job from beginning to end now – they’re not event pretending to be fair anymore.

  3. ”provocative marches through Muslim neighbourhoods…” So Muslim neighbourhoods are OK, is the norm, is acceptable. For God’s sake (I’m an atheist)why don’t I hear Irish neighbourhoods (I have Irish roots) ,, Italian neighbourhoods, French neighbourhoods, or whatever.
    Because we dont’t have them. These latter people have accepted their surroundings and have become part of them. Why should there be Muslim neighbourhoods?
    There is no reason to accept this and the journalist in this video (BBC?) should be hung by his cajones for assuming even that this ( Musim neighbourhood) is some form of standard.

  4. There were Irish neighbourhoods, Italian, German, etc when people immigrated in large numbers in the 19th and early 20th century. Today we have Somali neighbourhoods, whole towns in British Columbia with Chinese population, Muslim communities in the US ( Dearborn, Michigan). Religion has always been a major “tie that binds”, a way of identifying one’s self as a member of migrant community. It takes generations to integrate, particularly when your ethnic group is not welcome. NO IRISH NEED APPLY was often seen in the 19th century. Blacks were more valuable because they had been slaves and had a price.

    I cannot believe that anyone who saw the evidence of Brack Obama’s membership in a controversial Christian Church would ever think he is a Muslim. He was raised in Hawai’i by his banker maternal grandmother while his mother worked in SE Asia to help women develop micro-econimic skills.