French Senate passes ban of full Muslim veils

From Yahoo News:

AP – France’s Kenza Drider , wearing a niqab, drives a car in Avignon, southern France, Monday, Sept. 13, …
By ELAINE GANLEY, Associated Press Writer Elaine Ganley, Associated Press Writer Tue Sep 14, 1:13 pm ET

PARIS – The French Senate has voted overwhelmingly for a bill banning the burqa-style Islamic veil everywhere from post offices to streets, in a final step toward a making it law.

The Senate voted 246 to 1 Tuesday in favor of the bill, which has already passed in the lower chamber, the National Assembly.

Any dissenters have 10 days to challenge the measure in the Constitutional Council watchdog, but that is considered unlikely.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP’s earlier story is below.

PARIS (AP) — The French Senate debates Tuesday whether to ban the burqa-style veil, a move that affects only a tiny minority of the country’s Muslim women but has significant symbolic repercussions.

Muslims believe the latest legislation is one more blow to France’s second religion, and risks raising the level of Islamophobia in a country where mosques, like synagogues, are sporadic targets of hate. Some women have vowed to wear a full-face veil despite the law.

The proposed law was passed overwhelmingly by the lower house of parliament, the National Assembly, on July 13. The expected green light from the Senate would make it definitive once the president signs off on it — barring amendments and an eventual legal challenge.

The measure would outlaw face-covering veils in streets, including those worn by tourists from the Middle East and elsewhere. It is aimed at ensuring gender equality, women’s dignity and security, as well as upholding France’s secular values — and its way of life.

Kenza Drider, however, says she’ll flirt with arrest to wear her veil as she pleases.

“It is a law that is unlawful,” said Drider, a mother of four from Avignon, in southern France. “It is … against individual liberty, freedom of religion, liberty of conscience, she said.

“I will continue to live my life as I always have with my full veil,” she told Associated Press Television News.

Drider was the only woman who wears a full-faced veil to be interviewed by a parliamentary panel that spent six months deciding whether to move ahead with legislation.

Muslim leaders concur that Islam does not require a woman to hide her face. However, they have voiced concerns that a law forbidding them to do so would stigmatize the French Muslim population, which at an estimated 5 million is the largest in western Europe. Numerous Muslim women who wear the face-covering veil have said they are now being harassed in the streets.

Raphael Liogier, a sociology professor who heads the Observatory of the Religious in Aix-en-Provence, says that Muslims in France are already targeted by hate-mongers and the ban on face-covering veils “will officialize Islamophobia.”

“With the identity crisis that France has today, the scapegoat is the Muslim,” he told The Associated Press.

Ironically, instead of helping some women integrate, the measure may keep them cloistered in their homes to avoid exposing their faces in public.

“I won’t go out. I’ll send people to shop for me. I’ll stay home, very simply,” said Oum Al Khyr, who wears a “niqab” that hides all but the eyes.

“I’ll spend my time praying,” said the single woman “over 45” who lives in Montreuil on Paris’ eastern edge. “I’ll exclude myself from society when I wanted to live in it.”

The law banning the veil would take effect only after a six-month period.

The Interior Ministry estimates the number of women who fully cover themselves at some 1,900, with a quarter of them converts to Islam and two-thirds with French nationality.

The French parliament wasted no time in working to get a ban in place, opening an inquiry shortly after Conservative President Nicolas Sarkozy said in June 2009 that full veils that hide the face are “not welcome” in France.

The bill calls for euro150 ($185) fines or citizenship classes for any woman caught covering her face, or both. It also carries stiff penalties for anyone such as husbands or brothers convicted of forcing the veil on a woman. The euro30,000 ($38,400) fine and year in prison are doubled if the victim is a minor.

It was unclear, however, how authorities planned to enforce such a law.

“I will accept the fine with great pleasure,” said Drider, vowing to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg if she gets caught.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

5 Replies to “French Senate passes ban of full Muslim veils”

  1. The French have succeeded in making a tiny little negligible minority women reveal (cover less) more of the physique Let us go a step forward. The same majority French women, assuming that, one day, start a successful campaign demanding that they want freedom to reveal much wider cleavage of their breasts, cleavage of upper buttocks and upper thighs thus bringing an obligatory law making the women cover less and less. The French Govt agrees to conduct a referendum whether such a law has to be passed ( after all France is a democracy and so why not respect the wishes of the majority in a democracy) enforcing all women to dress as they women liberation movement demands on greater exposure of their bodies.

    The referendum goes ahead and 85% of the population vote for the law on greater exposure. In fact more men cast their yes vote, their sexually motivated reason being obvious. And French citizens ( the 15% NO VOTERS, the minority belonging to alien cultures) oppose this law and feel that it infringes on their personal rights on what they wish to cover and how much they wish to reveal . What will be the decision of the French Parliament? Will the Parliament and Judiciary force this law on all French women including the alien minority to reveal by law a wider cleavage of their breasts, buttocks and upper thighs. Hypocrisy and wanton double standard due to clash of civilization and racial superiority–that is what it amounts to

  2. the above comment is too stupid to be worth a serious refutation. Suffice it to say, it is illegal nearly everywhere to wear a disguise. No new law was even necessary. The disguise law was enough.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *