‘I have to keep her indoors now’: Muslim husband’s shocking response as wife is first to be fined £430 for wearing a burka

Well now we have an interesting situation. The Italians have already levied a fine to enforce a new law, now let’s see if they have the fortitude to enforce an old law, the one against kidnapping and forced confinement. If this man intends to keep his wife in a crate like a dog, then I think existing laws are sufficient to keep him in jail indefinitely. We shall see.

From the Daily Mail:

‘I have to keep her indoors now’: Muslim husband’s shocking response as wife is first to be fined £430 for wearing a burka

By Nick Pisa
Last updated at 5:25 PM on 4th May 2010

Massimo GiordanoNovara Mayor Massimo Giordano introduced new local laws banning clothing that ‘prevents the immediate identification of the wearer inside public buildings’

The Muslim husband of the first woman in Italy to be fined for wearing a burka has vowed to never let her outside again, because he doesn’t want other men looking at her.

Amel Marmouri, 26, was handed a penalty of 500 euros (£430) after being spotted by police officers in a post office in the northern city of Novara.

The fine is the first case of its kind in the country.

But the Tunisian’s husband, Ben Salah Braim, 36, said she will now have to remain indoors.

‘I just don’t know where we are going to get 500 euros to pay the fine. We thought as she was going to the mosque she was OK to wear the burqa.

‘We knew about the law and I know that it’s not against my religion but now Amel will have to stay indoors.

‘I can’t have other men looking at her.’

Under Italian anti-terrorist laws brought in during the 1970s to fight political activism, it is illegal to be seen in a public place with your face covered.

It had never been fully enforced but, earlier this year, Novara mayor Massimo Giordano introduced new local laws banning any clothing that ‘prevents the immediate identification of the wearer inside public buildings, schools and hospitals’.

The case comes just days after Belgium’s lower house of Parliament voted unanimously to prohibit women from wearing full-face veils in public.

If the bill is passed by the Senate, it would become Europe’s first national ‘burka ban’.

A general view of Novara in northern Italy, where the couple are  fromA general view of Novara in northern Italy, where the couple are from

The couple live in Novara, in northern Italy

Mayor Giordano is a member of the Northern League Party, which has campaigned for a clampdown on immigration and the building of mosques.

Mr Giordano said: ‘I signed the new regulations for reasons of security but also so that people who come to live in our city are aware and respect our traditions.

‘The regulations in Novara specifically cover people wearing clothing that prevents them from being identified in a public place, and a post office is a public place.

Veiled: A Muslim woman wearing the burka (posed by model)Veiled: A Muslim woman wearing the burka (posed by model)

‘This would also apply to a motorcyclist who walked into a post office wearing a crash helmet. The people of Novara do not want to see people walking around in the city wearing a burka.

‘This is the only way to stop behaviour that makes the already difficult process of integration even harder.’

Police chief Paolo Cortese said: ‘The fine was given because the woman was inside the post office at the time, which is a public building.’

The Northern League, which once called for the Italian Navy to shell boats carrying illegal immigrants towards the country, has called for the original 1975 terror law to be amended and make specific reference to Islamic face coverings.

The proposed wording would prohibit ‘the use of female garments common among women of Islamic faith known as burkas’.

Muslim groups in Italy today insisted that Italian laws must be respected.

Imam Izzedin Elzir, president of the Islamic Community and Organisations Union in Italy, said: ‘We are for the freedom of women and against veils of any kind and Italian laws must be respected.

‘We as an organisation have always said that we are against face veils or coverings in Italy because the law of recognition has to be observed.’

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

8 Replies to “‘I have to keep her indoors now’: Muslim husband’s shocking response as wife is first to be fined £430 for wearing a burka”

  1. shocking in what sense?
    Is there anyone who’s shocked by this reaction, the only shock should be that we let barbaric idiots into our enlightened western democracies anyway.
    Him, his wife (if she volunteers to go), and all his hideous backwards brood should be deported immediately, as should all these parasites, who take the benefits of the west without giving anything back.
    Ridiculous that we should be so weak, reflected in our leaders, the hostility being the reflection of ourselves.

  2. Kudos to the Italians, the Belgians, the French and the Swiss for doing what should be done; eradicate the symbols of a hateful ideology wherever is is, even if it is the clothes women have to wear under sharia law.

    Any appeasement to sharia law is undermining the common laws of the west, no matter if it is by allowing Islamic centres to operate, mosques to be built or madrassa schools to form. Islam is all of one piece, which is known as the ummah, and all symbols of the ummah are signals that the west does not want to defend its laws or culture from Islamization.

    Time to counter the lawfare that Islam is waging against the common laws of the west with some tit-for-tat legislation that inhibits the use and display of Islam’s symbols of conquest.

  3. IF the practitioners of ‘The Religion Of Peace’ are not happy here and are not compliant to western culture and ways, may I suggest the ruturn to their 7th century countries and practice their religion, in poverty devoid of any opportunity or future.

  4. Frank you may want to read Sam Solomon’s excellent book, The Hidden Trojan Horse. By coming here and attempting to establish Islamic primacy on us, they are following their religion. To be clear, Koran states clearly that “A Muslims who does not obey the hijra (Migration for the purpose of imposing Islam) is to be treated as an unbeliever”
    We need to understand this. It is no accident that Musims frequently move to specific areas which create strategic advantage, and ethnically cleanse the infidels out. It is a clear well established process and one Mohamed started when he moved from Mecca to Yathrib, renamed Medina after he slaughtered all the people who built the place. To verify this for yourself if you do not want to read the Koran, and who could blame you, look into the Islamic calendar. What date is it for Muslims? What is the calendar based on? the answers are revealing.

  5. And, just to add a bit of additional info to the date subject mentioned by Eeyore, we cannot ever remind ourselves too often that the date for the Sept. 11, 2001 muslim attacks on America was chosen because it was the same date on the Christian calendar that, in 1683, saw the military defeat of the muslim ottomans that ended the territorial expansion carried out in the name of mahound and its (not his) imaginary alter-ego allah.

    And, as for migration/invasion for the purpose of imposing mahoundianism, any mahoundian going to a civilized country in search of asylum is, by definition, a bogus refugee. In a nutshell, if they do their best, once within the borders of a Western country, to recreate the exact same conditions* of their places of origin as an excuse to obtain asylum, that means that there have never been any real reasons for applying for refugee status in the first place.

    *Misogyny, huge rates of illiteracy, ignorance, domestic violence, intellectual and economic failures, rejection of science and reason, promotion of mahoundian supremacism and its inherent treatment of non-mahoundians as second-class human beings, sharia-style court verdicts allowing them to get away with crime (see that case of the German female judge who didn’t grant a divorce request from a woman married to a wife-beating mahoundian by mentioning that Mein Qurampf allows muslim “men” to beat the living crap out of their female possessions), lack of energy and initiative for any hard work, the danger posed by allowing them to serve in infidel armed forces, the get-out-of-jail-free card for gang rapes of women who don’t walk around in mobile tents (and who, according to several imams, are supposedly “asking for rape” for not tenting themselves)… And couldn’t we go on, and on, and on listing the ways in which mahoundians work for the purpose of making places like London look and feel more and more like Karachi, Mecca and Mogadishu?

  6. The Flea said it best at his site, “By contrast, keeping your wife indoors because your demon has convinced you your penis is too small is still completely legal in Italy.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *