Sea levels rise, stupidest most pernicious lie of the decade

Here is one of those articles I have had open on a tab for over a week waiting to post. I suppose it took me so long because it really is infuriating that the third world, which basically takes no responsibility whatsoever for its citizens and instead wishes to enslave the tiny fraction of the worlds population which reproduces responsibly, which in fact looks after its children well, which husbands the environment so well that some of the highest human population density areas on earth in the USA have some of the lowest pollution levels, (remember, CO2 is NOT a pollutant) which puts its children into education at our own expense from the age of 5 years old or less and often until our 30s, as opposed to, well, not doing so, in order to learn skills that will enhance our world and our culture. At the end of the day, this pernicious lie about AGP is about attempting to punish the responsible fraction of the worlds people by enslaving them to the irresponsible percentage of the world without them having to change a damn thing about they way they think or live.

Africans are not being asked to breed more responsibly. Muslims are not being told to get a secular education and stop preaching hate against everyone else on earth or more importantly perhaps, learn to farm.

Meanwhile, the fraction of the world who does things quite well over all are being asked to work harder and give up more of what they create on the basis of lies like the sea level crap. If there was a single decent investigative journalist on earth left alive by now we would all know if Al Gore had any ocean front property in his portfolio and if he felt it would be a good idea to sell it fast and cheap. Of course we all know, no one is lowering the price of ocean front property. Because we all know the sea level rise thing is a lie.

So why is policy being made on the basis that it is not?

From The Telegraph:

Rise of sea levels is ‘the greatest lie ever told’

The uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story, writes Christopher Booker.

Christopher Booker
Published: 6:25PM GMT 28 Mar 2009

Comments 150 | Comment on this article

If one thing more than any other is used to justify proposals that the world must spend tens of trillions of dollars on combating global warming, it is the belief that we face a disastrous rise in sea levels. The Antarctic and Greenland ice caps will melt, we are told, warming oceans will expand, and the result will be catastrophe.

Although the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) only predicts a sea level rise of 59cm (17 inches) by 2100, Al Gore in his Oscar-winning film An Inconvenient Truth went much further, talking of 20 feet, and showing computer graphics of cities such as Shanghai and San Francisco half under water. We all know the graphic showing central London in similar plight. As for tiny island nations such as the Maldives and Tuvalu, as Prince Charles likes to tell us and the Archbishop of Canterbury was again parroting last week, they are due to vanish.

But if there is one scientist who knows more about sea levels than anyone else in the world it is the Swedish geologist and physicist Nils-Axel Mörner, formerly chairman of the INQUA International Commission on Sea Level Change. And the uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner, who for 35 years has been using every known scientific method to study sea levels all over the globe, is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story.

Despite fluctuations down as well as up, “the sea is not rising,” he says. “It hasn’t risen in 50 years.” If there is any rise this century it will “not be more than 10cm (four inches), with an uncertainty of plus or minus 10cm”. And quite apart from examining the hard evidence, he says, the elementary laws of physics (latent heat needed to melt ice) tell us that the apocalypse conjured up by
Al Gore and Co could not possibly come about.

The reason why Dr Mörner, formerly a Stockholm professor, is so certain that these claims about sea level rise are 100 per cent wrong is that they are all based on computer model predictions, whereas his findings are based on “going into the field to observe what is actually happening in the real world”.

When running the International Commission on Sea Level Change, he launched a special project on the Maldives, whose leaders have for 20 years been calling for vast sums of international aid to stave off disaster. Six times he and his expert team visited the islands, to confirm that the sea has not risen for half a century. Before announcing his findings, he offered to show the inhabitants a film explaining why they had nothing to worry about. The government refused to let it be shown.

Similarly in Tuvalu, where local leaders have been calling for the inhabitants to be evacuated for 20 years, the sea has if anything dropped in recent decades. The only evidence the scaremongers can cite is based on the fact that extracting groundwater for pineapple growing has allowed seawater to seep in to replace it. Meanwhile, Venice has been sinking rather than the Adriatic rising, says Dr Mörner.

One of his most shocking discoveries was why the IPCC has been able to show sea levels rising by 2.3mm a year. Until 2003, even its own satellite-based evidence showed no upward trend. But suddenly the graph tilted upwards because the IPCC’s favoured experts had drawn on the finding of a single tide-gauge in Hong Kong harbour showing a 2.3mm rise. The entire global sea-level projection was then adjusted upwards by a “corrective factor” of 2.3mm, because, as the IPCC scientists admitted, they “needed to show a trend”.

When I spoke to Dr Mörner last week, he expressed his continuing dismay at how the IPCC has fed the scare on this crucial issue. When asked to act as an “expert reviewer” on the IPCC’s last two reports, he was “astonished to find that not one of their 22 contributing authors on sea levels was a sea level specialist: not one”. Yet the results of all this “deliberate ignorance” and reliance on rigged computer models have become the most powerful single driver of the entire warmist hysteria.

•For more information, see Dr Mörner on YouTube (Google Mörner, Maldives and YouTube); or read on the net his 2007 EIR interview “Claim that sea level is rising is a total fraud”; or email him – – to buy a copy of his booklet ‘The Greatest Lie Ever Told’

Fined, frozen and now jailed

The Marine Fisheries Agency was certainly onto a winner when it enlisted the aid of the Assets Recovery Agency in its ruthless war against our fishermen. In December 2007 Charles McBride and his son Charles, from Kilkeel in Northern Ireland, were fined £385,000 for under-declaring catches of whitefish and prawns in the Irish Sea, threatening the loss of their homes and boat. But the Assets Recovery Agency, using powers designed to recover money from drug dealers, also froze all their assets. To pay the fines, the McBrides tried to borrow against their assets. Now, for this effort to pay the fines, Liverpool Crown Court has sentenced the two men to two and three months in gaol for “contempt of court”.

Blown away

The Climate Change Secretary, Ed Miliband, timed his jibe impeccably last week when he said that opposing wind farms is as “socially unacceptable” as “not wearing a seatbelt”. Britain’s largest windfarm companies are pulling out of wind as fast as they can. Despite 100 per cent subsidies, the credit crunch and technical problems spell an end to Gordon Brown’s £100 billion dream of meeting our EU target to derive 35 per cent of our electricity from “renewables” by 2020.

Meanwhile the Government gives the go-ahead for three new 1,000 megawatt gas-fired power stations in Wales. Each of them will generate more than the combined average output (700 megawatts) of all the 2,400 wind turbines so far built. The days of the “great wind fantasy” will soon be over.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

3 Replies to “Sea levels rise, stupidest most pernicious lie of the decade”

  1. I wish a person more knowledgable than myself would write and publish something about islands other than the Maldives, Kiribati, Tuvalu, etc., islands in the Atlantic, for example, which show no disappearance of land to the sea.
    And what is known about the seawalls/dikes of The Netherlands. Has any sea level rise been detected by the Dutch. Perhaps if it were known that nowhere else but some islands of the Indian Ocean and South Pacific is there a claimed loss of land area, we might have additional proof that “the big lie” is indeed just that. It is easy to predict that the GW fanatics will either ignore Dr. Morner or do a character assasination to discredit him.

  2. Michael it may be worth adding, that I find it highly unlikely that water levels can rise in one place in the ocean, and not another. If the ocean levels have risen for one island and not for example, in Vancouver harbour, then chances are someone is lying or the island is sinking, a very common phenomenon actually as so many islands are actually volcanic to begin with and rise and fall all the time to some degree.

  3. Hi, Marriage has in it less of beauty, but more of safety, than the single life; it hath not more ease, but less danger; it is more merry and more sad; it is fuller of sorrows and fuller of joys; it lies under more burdens, but is supported by all the strengths of love and charity; and those burdens are delightful. — Jeremy Talor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.