5 Replies to “At last! ONE elected representative has the raw courage to speak the unmitigated truth about Islam as a threat doctrine – THIS IS EPIC”
The irony of the truth spoken by Randy fine being followed up with rumbles atrocious autoplay and the toxic isis bride of Kim Iverson.
Tommy tuberville had sponsored anti Sharia legislation which I suspect did what republican-controlled senators do and sit
Know peace no Islam
no peace know Islam
Maybe the Trump 1.0 version of Islam can return instead of the 2.0 which enables it incessantly ?
We can hope…
During WWII, was there any concern expressed about offending and possibly alienating moderate Nazis? Why/why not?
Many – including JFK’s daddy – were proud, “moderate” knot-zees themselves:
“Popular concern for Europe’s Jews could not develop without wide-spread knowledge of what was happening to them. But the information gap, though extremely important, was not the only limiting factor.
“Strong currents of anti-Semitism and nativism in American society also diminished the possibilities for a sympathetic response. A quieter, more prevalent prejudice, a “passive anti-Semitism,” was another major barrier to the growth of concern.
“It was reflected in opinion surveys taken by the [USA] Office of War Information.
“They showed that the impact of atrocity information on the average American was
SEVEN TIMES STRONGER when it involved atrocities-in-general, than when
it referred specifically to atrocities against Jews.”
The irony of the truth spoken by Randy fine being followed up with rumbles atrocious autoplay and the toxic isis bride of Kim Iverson.
Tommy tuberville had sponsored anti Sharia legislation which I suspect did what republican-controlled senators do and sit
Know peace no Islam
no peace know Islam
Maybe the Trump 1.0 version of Islam can return instead of the 2.0 which enables it incessantly ?
We can hope…
During WWII, was there any concern expressed about offending and possibly alienating moderate Nazis? Why/why not?
We can learn a lot from history, doncha know.
No need to express concern – they were “our” business partners!
IBM, for example:
https://www.frontpagemag.com/ibm-and-holocaust-20-years-corporate-denial-edwin-black/
Many – including JFK’s daddy – were proud, “moderate” knot-zees themselves:
“Popular concern for Europe’s Jews could not develop without wide-spread knowledge of what was happening to them. But the information gap, though extremely important, was not the only limiting factor.
“Strong currents of anti-Semitism and nativism in American society also diminished the possibilities for a sympathetic response. A quieter, more prevalent prejudice, a “passive anti-Semitism,” was another major barrier to the growth of concern.
“It was reflected in opinion surveys taken by the [USA] Office of War Information.
“They showed that the impact of atrocity information on the average American was
SEVEN TIMES STRONGER when it involved atrocities-in-general, than when
it referred specifically to atrocities against Jews.”
https://shilohmusings.blogspot.com/2017/01/guest-post-seven-times-stronger.html