A couple of weeks ago, we published a talk given by one of three authors of the first Peer Reviewed study of the mRNA/DNA Gene therapy injections showing how dangerous it actually is, and that it was fraudulently misrepresented by the pharmaceutical companies.
That was by Dr. David Speicher, and I’ll embed his talk again below.
Co-author of the paper, Jessica Rose, explains very well what it meant to have the DNA contamination/impurity in the injections, and that they had to know it was there. Please download the study, save a copy to an offline drive and spread it around as much as possible. The link to the PubMed page is here, and the download link here. The author feels it is likely there will be pressure to remove it.
We recall when Covid first appeared, a number of Indian scientists published a paper on Twitter which proved that the virus had to have been made in a lab. They had discovered the Furin Cleavage plane, which had to be artificial. That study and evidence was memory holed within a day, although we managed to download it before they disappeared it and get an article done on it here.
Please download these documents, and spread them around if you can. There are a lot of people’s lives in limbo at the moment in courts and hearings, which, at least in theory, could be brought back into the service of the public when enough people understand that they were correct in their assessment of these products. The best and most honest doctors, police people and others have been pretty much wiped out in Canada in favour of narrative enforcers. Now that this paper at least has breached the Peer Reviewed barrier, there is one less objection by the state and its champions to the stopping of these shots and a proper perspective put on them.
Dr. David Speicher, one of the three authors of the paper, from Aug 24, 2025 from Rally in the Valley
This is a minor criticism. And I would apply this criticism to engineers of which I are one. Jessica Rose may indeed be as facile and brilliant as depicted, but she needs to spend some time qualifying the geek speak she uses for the wider audience. Most people don’t know anything about biochemistry, or biology. Some people have heard the word “nucleotide” but I, with a degree in engineering, had never heard the word “nucleoside”. Rattling off terms that she, in her private academic bubble use everyday for an audience is impressive, but does little to clarify what she discovered and its importance. In short, she needs to dumb it down a bit for those that are not in her sphere of influence.
Good observation.