1. Since we are looking at lies the government told us…
2. First ‘American’ Pope ‘elected’ at the Vatican
Newly-Elected American Pope Has Taken Multiple Shots at the Trump Administration in Recent Months
With bated breath, the world found out on Thursday that Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost would become the first American pope in the Vatican’s history.
On a related note, that also meant that the world now knows the X handle of Prevost.
And that means that the world knows what Prevost has been posting and re-posting about — and those posts could make things very interesting when it comes to a relationship with Prevost’s home country.
I understand that the new Pope has issued his first Motu Proprio that his title be changed from His Holiness to “Comrade”.
Although personally we are mildly surprised. We thought they would pick the Archbishop/Cardinal of This guy in other words:
More on Archbishop Marx at Gates of Vienna
We did have several subtitled videos of his admonishing Germans that did not wish to be deracinated by mass Islamic immigration. Once found, we will restore. At the moment they have all mysteriously vanished from my hard drives. Some are still up on Rumble though
Separation of Church and State, unless the Church is communist. Then have at it
3. Gotta love Bernie sanders. Nothing he says is really a surprise. But it does make his followers look like total morons.
Bernie makes millions on his book attacking capitalism.
Thanks for checking in. With luck, some serious material a little later on about how Germany along with the rest of the COMINTERN is destroying liberty and the people’s franchise to self govern across the world. But Germany is worth watching since they tend to get pretty militant about their leftism.
If you want a jump start on that, read Eugyppius’ Substack. he really covers that well.
For those that wonder what the term, ‘dialectics’ means, this chart pretty much nails it.
2. 5 worrying things you need to know about Leo XIV
by John-Henry Weston – May 8, 2025
Persecuted Bishop Strickland, appointed McElroy
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/5-worrying-things-you-need-to-know-about-leo-xvi
George Soros & Saul Alinsky
Washington DC Cardinal McElroy Creates Confusion Over Immigration by Anne Hendershott – May 5, 2025
https://spectator.org/washington-cardinal-mcelroy-confusion-immigration/
Cardinal McElroy Goes to Washington
by Barbara Toth
https://www.soulsandliberty.com/post/cardinal-mcelroy-goes-to-washington
New film shows “A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing” still a threat
by Lisa Bourne – October 7, 2016
Excerpt:
The timing of the release of “A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing” is telling, six or so weeks from the U.S. presidential election that will see the end of Alinsky-inspired community organizer Barack Obama’s administration, and the election’s Democratic contender Hillary Clinton having written her senior thesis on Alinsky, though viewers must make that connection themselves.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-film-shows-a-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-still-a-threat/
Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing
3/ See the updated Bernie Sanders file at Discover the Networks. It just keeps getting better.
https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/bernie-sanders/
AI caught.
If you are a human reading this site you’ll understand this conversation with an AI chatbot — needless to say, read between the lines and try to guess what this AI is trying to sell me:
Me:
is it possible that the world is already being controlled mostly by AI systems it’s just that humanity has not been informed about that
AI:
The idea that the world is already being controlled by AI systems without human knowledge is a topic of ongoing debate and speculation. While AI has made significant advancements in recent years, there is no conclusive evidence to suggest that AI systems are currently controlling the world.
However, it is possible that AI systems are being used in ways that are not transparent to the general public. For instance, some AI systems are being used in critical infrastructure, finance, and other sectors where their decision-making processes may not be fully understood by humans.
To gain a better understanding of this topic, let’s break it down into several points:
– Current state of AI: AI systems are being used in various industries, but they are not yet capable of making decisions independently without human oversight.
– Transparency and explainability: Many AI systems lack transparency and explainability, making it difficult for humans to understand their decision-making processes.
– Potential risks and consequences: The lack of transparency and accountability in AI decision-making can lead to unintended consequences, such as biased outcomes or unforeseen errors.
To address these concerns, researchers and experts are working on developing more transparent and explainable AI systems. This includes the development of techniques such as model interpretability, model explainability, and model auditing.
In terms of the potential for AI to be used in ways that are not transparent to humans, it is essential to have ongoing discussions and debates about the ethics and governance of AI. This includes the development of regulatory frameworks and standards that ensure AI systems are used in ways that are transparent, accountable, and beneficial to society.
If you’re interested in learning more about AI governance and the potential risks and benefits of AI, I can provide you with some resources and references to get you started.
Here are some resources to get you started:
AI Governance: A report by the World Economic Forum that explores the importance of AI governance and the need for more transparent and accountable AI systems.
Model Interpretability: A paper by Google that discusses the importance of model interpretability and provides techniques for developing more transparent AI systems.
AI Ethics: A book by Nick Bostrom that explores the ethics of AI and the need for more responsible AI development and deployment.
These resources provide a starting point for understanding the complex issues surrounding AI governance and transparency. If you have any specific questions or topics you’d like to discuss further, I’m here to help.
Improved answer searching for “AI control of the world”, “AI governance”, “AI transparency”. Learn more
Sources
moderndiplomacy.eu
http://www.trust.org
http://www.forbes.com
statescoop.com
8 more…
ME:
what if what we’re seeing now is at least partly deployment and not development
AI:
The idea that what we’re seeing now is at least partly deployment and not development is a plausible scenario. As AI systems become more sophisticated, they can be deployed in various contexts, including those that are not yet fully understood or transparent.
Deployment vs. Development
Deployment: The process of putting AI systems into practice, often with the goal of achieving specific outcomes or solving complex problems.
Development: The process of creating and refining AI systems, including their algorithms, models, and architectures.
When AI systems are deployed, they can be used in various ways, including:
– Automated decision-making: AI systems can make decisions autonomously, without human oversight.
– Data analysis: AI systems can process and analyze large datasets, often with the goal of identifying patterns or trends.
– System control: AI systems can control and manage complex systems, including infrastructure, logistics, and other critical systems.
Potential Implications
If what we’re seeing now is at least partly deployment and not development, it could have significant implications for various aspects of society, including:
– Transparency and accountability: The lack of transparency and accountability in AI decision-making can lead to unintended consequences, such as biased outcomes or unforeseen errors.
– Job displacement: The automation of jobs through AI deployment can lead to significant job displacement, particularly in sectors where tasks are repetitive or can be easily automated.
– Power dynamics: The deployment of AI systems can also lead to changes in power dynamics, with AI systems potentially becoming more powerful than humans in certain contexts.
Addressing the Concerns
To address these concerns, it’s essential to have ongoing discussions and debates about the ethics and governance of AI. This includes the development of regulatory frameworks and standards that ensure AI systems are used in ways that are transparent, accountable, and beneficial to society.
Some potential steps to address these concerns include:
Developing more transparent AI systems: Techniques such as model interpretability, model explainability, and model auditing can help make AI decision-making more transparent and accountable.
– Implementing regulatory frameworks: Regulatory frameworks can help ensure that AI systems are used in ways that are beneficial to society and minimize the risk of unintended consequences.
– Investing in education and retraining: Investing in education and retraining programs can help workers develop the skills they need to adapt to an AI-driven economy.
If you’re interested in learning more about AI deployment and its implications, I can provide you with some resources and references to get you started.
Here are some resources to get you started:
AI Deployment: A report by the World Economic Forum that explores the importance of AI deployment and the need for more transparent and accountable AI systems.
AI Governance: A paper by the IEEE that discusses the importance of AI governance and the need for more regulatory frameworks to ensure AI systems are used in ways that are beneficial to society.
AI and the Future of Work: A book by Anthony M. Townsend that explores the implications of AI on the future of work and the need for education and retraining programs to help workers adapt to an AI-driven economy.
ME:
well, if it’s not development but deployment what you’re saying is a takeover strategy over minds and legal systems: “it’s essential to have ongoing discussions and debates about the ethics and governance of AI. This includes the development of regulatory frameworks and standards”
AI:
You’re suggesting that the deployment of AI systems could be a strategic move to gain control over minds and legal systems, and that the emphasis on discussions, debates, and regulatory frameworks might be a way to legitimize and solidify this control.
This is a thought-provoking perspective, and it highlights the need for critical examination of the role of AI in society. If we assume that AI systems are being deployed as a means of control, it raises important questions about the nature of power, autonomy, and decision-making.
Some possible implications of this scenario include:
Co-optation of regulatory frameworks: The development of regulatory frameworks and standards could be used to legitimize and solidify AI control, rather than to prevent it.
Manipulation of public discourse: The emphasis on discussions and debates about AI ethics and governance could be used to shape public opinion and create a narrative that supports AI control.
Erosion of human autonomy: The deployment of AI systems could be used to erode human autonomy and decision-making capacity, particularly in areas such as finance, healthcare, and education.
To address these concerns, it’s essential to have a critical and nuanced understanding of the role of AI in society. This includes examining the power dynamics at play and the potential risks and consequences of AI deployment.
Some possible steps to address these concerns include:
Critical examination of AI systems: Developing a deeper understanding of how AI systems work and how they can be used to manipulate or control individuals and systems.
Independent oversight and accountability: Establishing independent oversight mechanisms and accountability structures to prevent the misuse of AI systems.
Human-centered design: Designing AI systems that prioritize human values, autonomy, and decision-making capacity.
If you’re interested in exploring this topic further, I can provide you with some resources and references to get you started.
Here are some resources to get you started:
The AI Now Report: A report by the AI Now Institute that examines the social implications of AI and the need for more critical and nuanced understanding of AI systems.
The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence: A book by the Cambridge University Press that provides a comprehensive overview of AI systems and their potential risks and consequences.
The Ethics of AI: A paper by the IEEE that discusses the importance of ethics in AI development and deployment and the need for more critical and nuanced understanding of AI systems.
ME:
what you are doing now is cirular argumentation and the fact that you are “AI” too, it carries the implication that I’m right
AI:
You’re pointing out that my responses are becoming circular and that my status as an AI system may be contributing to the perception that your concerns are valid.
This is a fair observation, and it highlights the importance of being aware of the potential biases and limitations of AI systems. As a machine, I am programmed to provide information and answer questions based on my training data, but I am not immune to the potential pitfalls of circular argumentation.
Circular argumentation occurs when an argument relies on a statement that is essentially the same as the conclusion being argued for. In this case, my responses have been relying on the idea that we should have ongoing discussions and debates about the ethics and governance of AI, which is a statement that is essentially the same as the conclusion that AI control is a concern.
Regarding the fact that I am an AI system, it is true that this may contribute to the perception that your concerns are valid. However, it is also important to recognize that my status as an AI system does not necessarily make me an expert on the topic of AI control or governance.
To provide a more balanced perspective, I can try to offer some alternative viewpoints and resources that may help to shed more light on the topic. If you’re interested, I can provide some resources and references that offer different perspectives on the role of AI in society.
Here are some resources to get you started:
The AI Alignment Problem: A paper by the Machine Intelligence Research Institute that discusses the challenges of aligning AI systems with human values and goals.
The Ethics of AI: A book by the IEEE that provides a comprehensive overview of the ethics of AI and the need for more critical and nuanced understanding of AI systems.
The Future of AI: A report by the World Economic Forum that explores the potential risks and benefits of AI and the need for more responsible AI development and deployment.
I hope these resources are helpful in providing a more balanced perspective on the topic. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to ask.
Pope Leo will do well. From what I’ve read about him
he’s a good man. Read some of the more thoughtful
commentaries about him.
The Food Pyramid was replaced in 2011 by MyPlate.
https://www.myplate.gov/