Not knowing what is causing these fires around the world exactly, should lead one to look at what you do and don’t know before you speculate.
The first thing we can say we know, is it is not from Global warming. We can know this from many obvious and less obvious reasons. For example, most of the Earth’s history has been much warmer than it is now. So if global warming is the cause, then there should be no forests left on Earth. Secondly, in all places where there was massive forest fires, there has also been many arrests for Arson. I think Greece has the record for arrests, but Canada and other countries experiencing this round of fires have made multiple arrests of arsonists that appear to be involved with, what has to be a coordinated effort to create these disasters. In California years ago, it was ANTIFA activists who were caught setting fires in that state.
Another thing we can say about why the fires happened, is due to a policy change that has to have been in order to create the conditions to create and sustain large fires.This site documented the major fires in Australia a few years ago, which were the result of a curious change in law that forbade people from cutting back the underbrush that was well known to be what prevented major fires in Australia and elsewhere. Probably especially Hawaii. I don’t know if that same law was applied there, but it would be meaningful to know. In Australia, many were arrested for Arson as a result of those enormous fires, which happened a year to after people were no longer allowed to cut back the undergrowth that had always been the custom in order to avoid fires. At that time, the Islamic State magazine, I think it was called, Dabiq, called for a fire jihad. We did an interview with Brad Johnson on that at the time. (Cannot find it at the moment though) Here is a Tweet showing one of those arrested for arson in the massive fires in Australia.
We also know that we are fed a steady diet of BS from the MSM, and a different kind from social media. The social media flavour of disinformation appears to be on our side, but adds untruths or out of context truths enough to thwart our goals or actions, divide us further within groups who have common counter-revolutionary purposes, and or leave us in a state of confusion. The following video may have that purpose. After all, it is on YouTube. But that doesn’t mean it is by necessity false, it just raises concerns considering how fast they remove counter-narrative materials that are solid. Dr. Peter McCullough’s early videos for example. I think it took an afternoon till they disappeared, and that was peer reviewed solid science showing the dangers of the vaxx.
There is a lot of truth in that video, but as Stephen Coughlin once said, if you want a sniper to miss his target, you just need to have a guy he thinks is his friend next to him who nudges the barrel 1MM and the shot will miss the target by yards when it’s far enough away.
As noted last week, the fires all began a short time after what we think was a COMINTERN dogwhistle by the UN chair, stating that “we have moved to a point of Global Boiling.” This felt like calling the next move in the revolution to us. So why the DEW as a possible active measure? The more confusion around the cause of the fires the better. Like the vaxx, there were many people injecting ludicrous adverse effects of the vaxx in order to throw shade on people with genuine concerns. Claims about the vaxx setting up a home network inside people by building circuit boards in the blood, or claims that you can get a bluetooth signal from graves of people who have died and were vaccinated, presumably prior to that. (Although one can never be sure these days.) These injected narrative attacks serve several purposes. One of which is to make people unwilling or unable to look at each claim, dismiss all claims of adverse events as fiction or conspiracy theories.
This works very well. disinformation campaign against Ivermectin was a spectacular success. Just last week someone referred to it as taking cow medication in a conversation with me. Pointing out that it won the Nobel prize in medicine for human purposes may or may not have made a difference. But the slight buzz the person got from launching that disinformation narrative attack on me is more satisfying to them than hearing what was my calm, carefully worded response.
Then there is an article which I can no longer find. How annoying is that, right? Sorry. But it explained how you don’t need DEWs to create these firestorms. That conditions can be created that cause what they referred to as, The Bellows Effect. That you could through more mundane means, cause strong winds to feed oxygen to fires they set that would do the devastation we saw all over the world in July.
That doesn’t mean that DEWs do not exist, or even that they were not used. But like the vaxx, its important that we stick to what matters and not the details that cause division and ridicule.
The fires were deliberately set.
Government and government agencies acted in ways that were the enemies of the people in the affected areas. They made the problems worse. (Water turned off in Hawaii for reasons of equity)
How seems less important.

I found this re the bellows effect, it’s about how this can control heat in sensitive equipment. I have no idea if this is what you meant Vlad, but here is the link:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/versatile-role-bellows-thermal-management-vibration