Ontario passes ant-freedom law with no debate, and no vote – Pure fiat fascism

Source: Ontario.Ca

ONTARIO REGULATION 577/21

made under the

REOPENING ONTARIO (A FLEXIBLE RESPONSE TO COVID-19) ACT, 2020

Made: August 24, 2021
Filed: August 24, 2021
Published on e-Laws: August 24, 2021
Printed in The Ontario Gazette: September 11, 2021

AMENDING O. REG. 364/20

(RULES FOR AREAS AT STEP 3 AND AT THE ROADMAP EXIT STEP)

1. Section 2 of Schedule 1 to Ontario Regulation 364/20 is amended by adding the following subsections:

(2.1) The person responsible for a business or organization that is open shall operate the business or organization in compliance with any advice, recommendations and instructions issued by the Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health, or by a medical officer of health after consultation with the Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health,

(a)  requiring the business or organization to establish, implement and ensure compliance with a COVID-19 vaccination policy; or

(b)  setting out the precautions and procedures that the business or organization must include in its COVID-19 vaccination policy.

(2.2) In subsection (2.1),

“medical officer of health” means a medical officer of health as defined in subsection 1 (1) of the Health Protection and Promotion Act.

2. Section 2 of Schedule 4 to the Regulation is amended by adding the following subsections:

(2.1) The person responsible for a business or organization that is open shall operate the business or organization in compliance with any advice, recommendations and instructions issued by the Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health, or by a medical officer of health after consultation with the Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health,

(a)  requiring the business or organization to establish, implement and ensure compliance with a COVID-19 vaccination policy; or

(b)  setting out the precautions and procedures that the business or organization must include in its COVID-19 vaccination policy.

(2.2) In subsection (2.1),

“medical officer of health” means a medical officer of health as defined in subsection 1 (1) of the Health Protection and Promotion Act.

Commencement

3. This Regulation comes into force on the day it is filed.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

2 Replies to “Ontario passes ant-freedom law with no debate, and no vote – Pure fiat fascism”

  1. This is pure fascism – and means that even if people have a valid constitutional or health exemption to the jabie-jabie, they will be unable to function in society.

    De-personning and exterminating – lovely.

  2. Please correct me if I am wrong, but my reading of this means that it creates an army dictators complete with conflicting dictates.

    As written, all that needs to happen is for any medical officer to “consult” with the Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health (and it does not even state what the consultation is about), then regardless of the outcome of the “consultation”, thereafter the condition has been met. And that same medical officer has the authority of a dictator.

    Will the courts allow that? Hopefully not. However, it is the type of thing that should never have been written as to allow the above interpretation. But it has, and it will.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*