How the left uses a crisis to destroy all our rights and freedoms. Now using Halle Germany attack

After the New Zealand attack on a mosque, those of you who followed the issue may remember how quickly all evidence of the video and the manifesto was removed from the internet except for the most protected and adept at finding these sorts of things.

The next thing that happened, was the socialist (read communist) PM of New Zealand  used that attack, while ignoring the thousands of islamic attacks of manifest destiny, even the one that came soon after, killing hundreds of Christians in Sri Lanka, to advance her program of increased power to the state, and the right to send police out to every New Zealander that ever objected to mass immigration policies or Islam in general. (This could be an example of Marcuse’s ‘Repressive tolerance’.)

The tragedy of that attack, was rapidly turned into an opportunity by the state, to dramatically increase its power beyond what democracy allows for, at the expense of the individual, or any dissenting opinion. The state did so by inventing the narrative and opinions of the attacker in a way that was convenient to the state’s agenda, and by doing its best to bury any actual evidence of the real reasons the attacker did what he did.

For example they claimed he was a Trump supporter, even though his manifesto was clearly contemptuous of President Trump.

They made him a “Far right wing extremist” even though he called himself, a “National Bolshevik” in his manifesto. Which is a real thing. A merger of Nazi socialism with Soviet Socialism as far as I understand it. He also had all his weapons and materials covered in names of famous Balkan war heroes who had died fighting against Islamic manifest destiny in Central Europe and played a famous song to the cause of liberation of the Balkans from Islamic oppression.

All of that was well chronicled on this blog as it happened. The videos of the police going to people’s doors in New Zealand was especially interesting from this point of view.

So when a lone, antisemitic nut in Germany went to attack a Synagogue in Halle, we expected something similar from the Merkel government. In this case, predictably that the far right is “Very very very very dangerous, at least as dangerous as Islamic terror.” Try to remember that when you watch the actual attack by this guy, linked at the bottom. A Jihadi could have stabbed 50 people by the time his psycho gave up his general failure.

Direct link:

The next thing we expected was that the Merkel government and her puppet groups, in this case a “Jewish” group that is a beard for communists to attack the AfD, and has been used before by leftist groups in Germany, would blame this dangerous “very very very very far right” extremist on the AfD, as somehow responsible.

Direct link:

At this point we invite you to see the actual attack video the killer made when he did his little mission. In order to see it, we recommend that you are running a VPN, and have a torrent client installed like u Torrent or BitTorrent. If you have a torrent client and are protected by a VPN, then click this link and it should start the download of the file to your local machine. You may have to find the .torrent file on your machine and click that to start the download of the video. Once you have it, please keep your torrent client open a day or so to help other people see what really happened, and what the German government is saying is at least equal to Islamic terror in Europe.

(Below is the description of the video. It should also be noted that he does shoot two people in this video. The faces were blurred of his victims, and what appears to be his home made black powder produces so much smoke that you do not see much of the aftermath of his shooting. So on the one hand it is graphic, but on the other hand not compared to the average TV show.)

This is the archive of the live stream by the Halle Germany attacker of a Synagogue and Kebab shop.

We are providing this video not in support of his actions. But because modern leftist governments hide evidence of political crimes in order to reinvent the motives, remove the rights of citizens based on narratives, and increase the power of the state.


One cannot have a democracy by any definition without free access to information.


We do not know what inspired this guy to attack. Our concern is that the attack will be turned into a weapon against all freedom loving people, as an excuse to censor the internet and restrict even more of our basic and natural rights.


The good news is, his incompetence prevented much real damage from being done, but he did murder two innocent people.


What is true is that at no point did he appear to endorse any political leader or ideology, other than classical antisemitism. And any attempt to make it look like he did should be met with this video.


One may remember how the video of the mosque attacker of New Zealand was erased from the internet and a replaced false narrative was invented in order to advance socialist control of as many areas of the world geographically, as well as in terms of the intellectual and legal space as possible.


We must all work to prevent tyrannical governments from allowing that to happen.


These two quotes serve as explanation:


“The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State.” —-Josph Goebbels, Nazi propaganda minister


And equally importantly from the side of light:


“…I have sworn upon the altar of God Eternal Hostility Against Every Form of Tyranny Over The Mind Of Man.”

– Thomas Jefferson 1800 AD

The Jefferson quote is our motive for making this post.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.

Deep and profound Condolences for the two victims of this attack, and all who knew them.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

12 Replies to “How the left uses a crisis to destroy all our rights and freedoms. Now using Halle Germany attack”

  1. I watched the entire video of the Christchurch New Zealand massacre and it was the best argument for banning “assault weapons” I have ever seen. It’s still a dumb idea but there’s no doubt that such rifles are extremely powerful and deadly. But the New Zealand authorities have actually made it a serious criminal offense to even view that video now and they have buried all the information to the point that you can’t even find out what kind of gun he used. To the New Zealanders, the fact that the crime was so serious negates any right you or I may have to know about it. The authorities consider themselves the only adults in the room and plainly think that children such as you and me are too stupid to handle such strong content and need to rely on real grownups like them to tell us what to think.

    GOD, I hate that!!! Did the nice man from Saudi Arabia pay somebody’s mortgage or pave the way for them to advance in the Police hierarchy? Is that how this works? Or does the man from Saudi Arabia have photos of somebody making out with a teenage boy, perhaps? I don’t know but it never ceases to amaze me how quickly people who are supposed to be on my side do the exact thing that the nice man from Saudi Arabia wants to see happen.

    • New Zealand: What bothered me more was the swift removal of the Manifesto. I had read up to 25 pages, planned to read the rest the next day, impossible. It was gone, although I had saved it. When I reopened it, it was blank.

      • Are you sure you saved the actual document, instead of a link? Or the document (html?) had links in it to online resources?

        I browsed through it, to verify a claim that the shooter was a Christian extremist. Which was nonsense of course.

        What struck me about the media, is how little discussion there was about the shooter’s background. He’d travelled extensively, to some very odd destinations. Bulgaria or Turkey wouldn’t be high on my list, but wth was he doing in North Korea!? That should raise an instant red flag, so why wasn’t he on the radar?

        The whole thing smells funny imho.

  2. Thanks Eeyore for your very clear presentation. The videos you’ve chosen are enlightening but frustrating. I find the AfD rep kind of fails in his own defense against this incredibly prepositioned interviewer. The “journalist”, or any Leftist agent, must necessarily make some kind of leap across what is factual in order to get on track to his fictional narrative. This is the critical moment in any discussion with a Leftist, and it is not always easy to identify. It is a tactical imperative that lies be identified as soon as possible, the conversation halted, and the bus backed up to where reality ended. In this case the paved road stopped where the communist agent began talking about wolves and sheep. Mr. Meuthen should have told the interviewer to ask Mr. Hocke what he meant by the animal metaphor, instead of being drawn into the Hitler swamp. It isn’t easy to be so prescient, but it is required and comes with practice. And I will never quite get used to these opportunists who present as Jewish, such as Mr. Friedman, while occupying precisely the political real estate most harmful to Jewish people. I know this is an inconvenient truth. They are fantastically eloquent, intellectual and effective. They consistently occupy gatekeeper and opinion leader positions. They brow beat the very people and organizations who will be the first to offer them sanctuary in a crisis. Dystopia has Bernie Farber to play this role. Is it wrong to call them imposters in the fashion that Obama was an imposter to the service of the American people? After all, accusing the AfD of “political arson” is very strong language. Exactly what does this mean? It means nothing, in fact, yet it manages to juxtapose the AfD with the murderer. This is all it is meant to do. The deft touch of juxtaposing conservatives with negative images or events is very simple and effective. Recall Wendy Mesley holding up the Pepe nonsense to ambush Petersen?

    When you watch this interview now, from the beginning, with the knowledge of the coming ambush, I find her demeanor all the more telling. She is relaxed and complimentary. She softens him up by telling him how popular he is. She lures him to where she wants him at 4:45, then pulls out the photo.

    Simple juxtaposition. It should be returned in spades.

    • When is see the Friedman guy, I can only think of his “cocaine and prostitute” scandal in the 90s (or early 2000s -can’t remember). The tabloids in Germany paraded him around as a pervert then allowed him to do apology tour with his famous line of “I’m only human.” Since then his been a well behaved tool for the establishment. He always comes across as so very arrogant.

      As far as Meuthen response goes, that has been the procedure for some years now (telling the “journalist” to ask Höcke himself about his remarks), but now I think the strategy has change to pointing out the media’s obsession with Nazi language or associating the AfD with all things Nazi and how ridiculous doing that is. That’s just my take.

  3. The shooter (Stephan B.) is also made to look like an Anon, to shut down those boards as well. So many people are saying that the whole thing looks staged/like theatre. I’ve seen enough evidence about crisis actors, ads on craig’s lists for “actors” for military drills and other evidence to believe such things exist. I think the Merkel goonies set this up. Right after the Jihadi Truck attack (distraction) and right before the election (manipulation). Not a coincidence.

  4. The home-made powder is interesting. I checked Luty’s site yesterday, since the media referenced the homemade firearms, and it mentions home-made ammo. It offers a manual to make it without specialist tools (btw didn’t download any of the plans, would advise everybody not to either – you’ll probably end up on a watchlist).

    Anyway, I was wondering if homemade (low-quality?) powder could be the cause of all the jamming. Where there’s smoke there’s residue, I assume. Anybody here with expertise in that area?

    I also wondered about the shootout He fired his shotgun at the cop car about 40m away. Can you actually hit anybody with shot from that distance? I doubt anything below deer shot could penetrate a car door,. The cops were probably hiding behind the engine block anyway.

    I’m sure slugs are useless in that situation, their trajectory is unpredictable due to absence of rifling.

    • My first thought watching this was that because he had put SO much time, effort and money into making his ordnance, he probably did not want to “waste” any of it actually training or practicing. The whole thing was a goat f**k. And to have the GErman government use this attack to claim that the far right is at least as dangerous as Islamic terror, when that week alone there was a major foiled attack at a german mall, a truck ramming and a man deep inside French counter terrorism who killed several police and it was discovered, also had a thumb drive with sensitive info about counter-terror personnel, that makes government more evil than both.

    • If the firearm was a semi auto the powder fouling would have jammed it, if it was a pump actoin, bolt action, lever action or a single barrelled or double barreled weapon designed to open at the breach two shots shouldn’t be enough to jam the action. Semi auto handguns didn’t become popular until smokeless powder was readily available.

      FYI homemade smokeless powder is as easy to make and black but it is a lot more dangerous when you are cutting it into the granules to load into the case.

      OT slightly. Black Powder is a true explosive, smokeless powder isn’t a true explosive, ut just burns fast enough to mimic an explosion.

      • I watched the video and the rifle was all painted black and covered with white writing but it must have been an AR-15 or an AR-10 or some kind of semi-auto Sturmgewehr. He fired as fast as he could without being full-auto and he reloaded very quickly and the gun did not jam. All fifty of the people died amazingly fast and with very little protestation. A few people shouted and then there was nothing but the extremely loud, rapid, “bang, bang, bang!”.

        It makes no sense to try to ban such weapons but they are every bit as deadly as Beto O’rourke says they are. The embarrassing dufus actually got that right. I can’t imagine what line of thinking made the New Zealand authorities react the way they did but I suspect it’s something similar to the Sandy Hook phenomenon where the actors are literally driven insane by the sheer horror of the massacre and basically react hysterically and illogically… That’s my guess, anyway…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *