The AfD is in fact the only non-far left option for Germans. It is classically Liberal and even a former leader of Mossad endorsed them and wished all European nations had an AfD option. The AfD are essentially just what nearly all politicians were for the past hundred years or more in the Western, Greco-Judeo-Christian world.
This rhetoric against them is intended to cause the useful idiots of communism to start murdering people. This is an astonishing level of deception and jingoism by the Socialists of Germany.
To understand the dialectical engine of destruction that forms the foundation of this kind of rhetoric, please try and read a few pages a day of this paper by Stephen Coughlin.
Direct link:
https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmNYbVzkNYQXsqxcXw3dzoL42dyAacnC68dGA4tGZTPBjF
description of event in Germany:
Katja Kipping, Chairwoman of Die Linke, (A Stasi connected East German hard core commie group and member of the comintern that is actually IN the German Parliament at this time), gave a speech at the demonstration “Indivisible” in which she insinuated that right-wing terrorists have connections to the AfD. She also warns that behind every AfD person in a suit there is a Nazi ready to fire a gun.
My computer hasn’t allowed me to view this for some reason, but here is an interesting insight into social psychology to explain group dynamics:
The core dynamic of the Common Knowledge Game is this: how does private knowledge become — not public knowledge — but common knowledge? Common knowledge is something that we all believe everyone else believes. Common knowledge is usually also public knowledge, but it doesn’t have to be. It may still be private information, locked inside our own heads. But so long as we believe that everyone else believes this trapped piece of private information, that’s enough for it to become common knowledge.
The reason this dynamic — the transformation of private knowledge into common knowledge — is so important is that the social behavior of individuals does not change on the basis of private knowledge, no matter how pervasive it might be. Even if everyone in the world believes a certain piece of private information, no one will alter their behavior. Behavior changes ONLY when we believe that everyone else believes the information. THAT’S what changes behavior. And when that transition to common knowledge happens, behavior changes fast.
The classic example of this is the fable of The Emperor’s New Clothes. Everyone in the teeming crowd possesses the same private information — the Emperor is walking around as naked as a jaybird. But no one’s behavior changes just because the private information is ubiquitous. Nor would behavior change just because a couple of people whisper their doubts to each other, creating pockets of public knowledge that the Emperor is naked. No, the only thing that changes behavior is when the little girl (what game theory would call a Missionary) announces the Emperor’s nudity loudly enough so that the entire crowd believes that everyone else in the crowd heard the news. That’s when behavior changes.
Common knowledge! This reminds me of a story I read or heard, don’t remember where now:
When Kruschev opened the files on Stalin’s crimes after his death, in the 1950’s, A voice in the audience shouted: “And where were you, when all this was happening?”
“Who said that?” Kruschev asked.
There was silence in the room.
“I was exactly where you are sitting now comrade.”
Up to page 8 in “Unconstrained Analytics”. At 255 pages it will take a while to read. I’m hearing echoes of other things I’ve read.
Thank you for the link VT
Vtb is where it’s at. Spread the word.
Is there a link for the Israeli/Jewish gentleman above please?
He is a retired (now possibly deceased) head of Mossad. Shouldn’t be hard to find. Israeli friends of ours have said he gets the highest respect in Israel and was/is much loved.