Selective enforcement and selective punishment: Discrimination is finne, so long as its against everything non-Marxist: Links 1 for Aug.9, 2017

Forward:

There are additions to the post about James Damore, the google employee who wrote something which was the most basic orthodoxy for over 100 years, espousing the benefits of a meritocracy with all that may entail, and how one might be able to beat the natural demographic results of that merit principle without actually selecting against the competent. Please check it out. It turns out that yes, he was offered a job at Wikileaks, which I most sincerely hope he takes.

What is also interesting is how the articles about his firing are written. Referring to him as “Google’s macho man”, and other absurd and untrue epithets about him In fact I can pretty much tell exactly how a guy like that would have been treated in high school in the 50s, 60, or 70s and no one but no one would have called him a “macho-man”. Perhaps, “Found in his locker with his pocket protector in his mouth man” might be closer.

The writing on this event by the Neo-Marxist media mirrors the reviews on Charles Murray’s coauthored book, The Bell Curve about IQ and predictability, quite a bit. In fact that is why I bought and read The Bell Curve. Because all the reviews had two things in common. They all agreed it was an evil book and should not have been written, and all the reviews I read had been written by people who had not read the book, but based their reviews on the importance of not knowing that kind of information, and showed their lack of hypocrisy by not knowing it.

It is the same with Damore’s memo. Many of the reviews actually do not link the memo itself. Because like any proper communist, one makes sure the public is disgusted with something but careful to make sure they don’t actually know with what exactly. That way it can be anything, anytime, for any reason that suits the ideological echo-chamber that Damore described so well.

So please check out the post.

1. Bakers Refused to Make Birthday Cake for 9-Year-Old Trump Fan

(When a small bakery did this to a gay couple, not wanting to make a gay wedding cake, they were destroyed in business, and then sued and lost their homes. I do not wish this on these people, or on anyone who makes their own choices for their own reason. But this one sidedness is not acceptable and the unfairness of it is palpable and even visceral. If something is not done to address the one sided, pro-Marxist use of force against American and Western citizens by the law, it will simply be done by the people. The law and what is just and fair typically cannot diverge too much or for too long.)

Remember when the left set out to ruin the lives of Christian bakers who refused to make wedding cakes for same-sex marriages? And remember the letter Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders read at the July 26 White House press briefing from a boy named Dylan who said Donald Trump was his favorite president? Well, it seems that the left doesn’t have a problem with refusing to bake a cake for reasons of conscience, if it’s a pro-Trump cake for a child.

 

For privacy reasons, Huckabee didn’t reveal the boy’s name, but the news media put all its investigative efforts into identifying him and confirmed the letter came from 9-year-old Dylan Harbin of California.

Now we are learning that when Dylan asked for a “Donald Trump cake” for his birthday, his mother “made him one herself, because she couldn’t find a bakery willing and able to do it,” according to the Washington Times.

2. A comment under Peterson’s YT video with James Damore suggested comparing search results for the term: “American Inventors” with Duckduckgo search results.

Below, the graphic of the Google result. (Also I didn’t know Alexander Graham Bell was black, did any of you?)

3. Some arrests at the Milan central station:

4. Pictured: Algerian, 36, suspected of mowing down six soldiers outside barracks in Paris terror attack before being shot five times and arrested while ‘driving his BMW towards Calais’

Dijon who mowed down 6 French soldiers

This picture is believed to show the suspected terrorist shot and arrested in connection with this morning’s attack in Paris, which saw six soldiers injured when a BMW mowed down their patrol.

Hamou Bachir, 36, is under armed guard in hospital after he was ‘seriously wounded’ in a fierce gunfight close to the northern port town of Boulogne-sur-Mer after he was intercepted driving towards Calais.

Bachir, who was not known to the security services, was shot five times, with one officer also hit by a bullet, before being arrested, according to a security source.

The suspect – who also uses the name Benlatreche – is thought to be an illegal immigrant who was subject to a ‘foreigner infraction’ notice meaning he faced deportation to Algeria, which used to be French colony.

5. Bill Clinton explains how we got into this mess with North Korea:

6. Democrat congressman has painting of Statue of Liberty in Islamic dress in his office.

Thank you Ava Lon, M., Wrath of Khan, EB., Richard, Yucki and so many more. 

I would like to offer the following advice to all who would like to abandon the merit principle.

In the history of mankind, the merit principle, which is in near perfect accord with Darwinian principles, have led to the greatest amount of peaceful prosperity that mankind has ever known. Its intrinsic fairness has allowed people who may have wished to be pro-basketball players, but simply were not the best at it, to gracefully step aside and do something else for which their talents, or risk taking ability, or acceptable wage, or amount of time required or even enjoyment of work was acceptable to them and the world gained at least two times by these events. It got the best basketball player and it allowed not the best basketball player to find another useful task for society in general.

But when a society makes forced moves against that principle, and these moves are always forced, it will result in one thing.

The merit principle will reassert itself. But not in terms of who is best at each given task, but who is best in the most efficient, brutal and ruthless application of violent force.

There will be war, and mass killings because that kind of unfairness will not be allowed to stand. And the best at war will win just as Warlords in the Balkans became the leaders of small areas when the principle of fairness and equality were abandoned over issues of Islamic Vs, Western style governments.

So in the end, it will be the merit principle that governs. But one that is far less preferable than the kind Western civilization, and especially the USA, has made its core principle till recently.