The ludicrousness of the suicide note is a kind of proof all on its own

It stands to reason that having someone killed because they are a threat to a crime family has little value if it does not send out a signal to others who may be inclined to also reveal information which is a threat to that crime family.

Someone being murdered in the course of a robbery where nothing was taken even though much easy access wealth was on the victim’s person is one example. Or a suicide note which specifically states: “No foul play whatsoever was to blame”. Clearly the idea was to signal anyone connected to any given crime family that an attempt to betray the nature of the family’s crimes and deceptions to the general public would have lethal consequences.

Is the United States a nation of laws? Or is it a kleptocracy like so many third world nations  and an increasing amount of Western nations?



About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

7 Replies to “The ludicrousness of the suicide note is a kind of proof all on its own”

  1. Is the United States a nation of laws? Or is it a kleptocracy like so many third world nations and an increasing amount of Western nations?

    This is what we are determining now, if we arrest try and sentence Hillary, Bill, Obama, Loretta Lynch and many others from both the Clinton and Obama administrations we will have returned to a nations of laws. If on the other hand we don’t arrest and try those mentioned above we are a Kleptocracy that once another Democrat is elected will cease to have elections. I personally doubt that we will find any prosecutor willing to make the civil war go kinetic by prosecuting any of the above but we need to prosecute them.

  2. We used to joke about how the Kremlin would report such occurrence in the Pravda:
    “Ivan Ivanovich, who was critical of our beloved leader, killed himself because he realized how wrong he was. He shot himself in the back five times. His friend and co-conspirator Vladimir Vladimirovich also wanted to commit suicide to accept his responsibility, but he did not went home… Yet…”

      • Hold onto your collective hats, folks. I’m not sure if this has received previous exposure at Vlad Tepes Blog, but at time point 04:22 in the above—“Monica Petersen: Latest In Clinton Body Count?”—Infowars video, specific mention is made of Tony (brother to the former chairman of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, John) Podesta and how this sibling owns an “art collection” which has truly disturbing content.

        Please be advised: All content hereon-in is NSFW nor is it appropriate for young viewers.

        Remember, this is the same address of that 2016 “spirit cooking” pizza party—(Search YouTube for: MARINA ABRAMOVIC SPIRIT COOKING). From the link:

        A new WikiLeaks release of stolen emails belonging to Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta reveal an invitation by his brother [Tony] to a “Spirit Cooking dinner” at the home of artist Marina Abramovic.

        “Spirit Cooking with Essential Aphrodisiac Recipes” was released by Ms. Abramovic in 1996, but the “ingredients” call for “fresh breast milk with fresh sperm milk” to be consumed “on earthquake nights.”

        New York’s Museum of Modern Art called it a “cookbook” for “evocative instructions for actions or thoughts.” Another recipe calls for “fresh morning urine.”

        “Are you in NYC Thursday July 9 Marina wants you to come to dinner Mary?” Tony Podesta says in an email forwarded to his brother June 28, 2015.

        “Dear Tony, I am so looking forward to the Spirit Cooking dinner at my place,” Ms. Abramovic says in a June 25 email sent at 2:35 a.m. GMT +2. “Do you think you will be able to let me know if your brother is joining? All my love, Marina.”

        When taken together with repeated allegations of pedophilia, child-trafficking, plus other hyper-corrupt and extremely questionable activities in Haiti, this Olympic swimming pool-sized lagoon of slime begins congealing into an intussusceptive blockage which “obstruction or abortion of justice” cannot begin to adequately describe.

        One simple question: “Would you willingly have your residential art collection prominently feature a sculpture that graphically depicts a human pose almost identical to that of a victim decapitated by Jeffrey Dahmer? Again: NSFW.

        See: Arch of Hysteria-Dahmer Comparison

        The Podestas and, by extension, Hillary Clinton, are some seriously sick people.

        The mere notion of spending time in a household that featured such repulsive depictions of children—and not immediately reporting that home’s occupant to local law enforcement authorities defies all comprehension.

        To All Readers: Please be advised that I detest any and all censorship of artistic content. This stance forces me to defy banning of (C)Rap “music” even as I am revolted by the way that over 90% of its performers gleefully erode all ethical and moral societal values. (Please see Eek A Mouse for a modicum of relief.)

        Likewise, the “Arch of Hysteria” sculpture’s artist is entitled to market the POS that she’s excreted from whatever studio. I can only hope that a sane world would both ridicule and emphatically (i.e., physically) oppose any marketing of such filth as part of eradicating her mindset from whatever sort of general acceptance. I refer you to Andres Serrano’s, putrid, “Piss Christ” or Tracy Emin’s, ridiculous, “My Bed”.

  3. “BOMBSHELL: Attorney Links Clinton Foundation To Mayo Clinic, Peter Smith” The Alex Jones Channel – July 17, 2017

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *