Head of AfD’s Berlin branch, Georg Pazderski. He said that “most terrorists are Muslims” and that “there is a high readiness to commit violent acts among Islamists but also in Islam and that’s the big problem we are facing today.
Translation and explanation thanks to Ava Lon.
real hip pony tail on that last antifa scummer ..
Who knows what is in another human’s mind until his blade enters your liver. Is it simply a function of not turning one’s back? Keeping a closed mind? Never turn the light off? Keeping your enemies close? Apartied? Genocide and let mother nature try again? There is only war. These two cultures have been incompatible, since the Beginning. Blood must once again soak the sands of Mother Earth. The “jihad” has almost ended and the Islamic-Colonist War began. The Red Hats have Planned and Spoken in the false prophet’s name. Their Poison Is In Our Well and what do we do but watch down the road for the Comming. Our children, if they live, will say “shame on our fathers, for they knew not and looked not and did not and this is the result”. “Stupid fathers, the source of our DNA.
These two cultures have been incompatible…
True, but take it all the way, because the problem is Islam.
Mohammedans can’t live with Hindus, Buddhists, Zoroastrians, Jews, Christians, Sikhs, or even with each other.
Shia-Sunni doesn’t work all that well. Dogma professed has to be identical, expression can’t vary by an eyelash.
The Naz’s are out in force calling themselves anti Nazis. We are once again at the crux of freedom or slavery, the slavers are spreading their poisoned honey seducing the unwary around the world. They have slowly infiltrated all aspects of our society and think that they can control the peoples thoughts and thus their lives.
There is a growing resistance to the left and their Islamic allies but this is hampered by the enemies of freedom controlling the traditional media sources. This war will have periods of traditional large scale war but more periods of asymmetric war and rare brief periods of both sides resting and preparing for the next phase. It will be long and bloody but in the end freedom will win.
We’ll never be free until we separate from the Tards. Otherwise it’ll just be a series of hudnas.
That is what we are facing between now and when WWIII is finally over, a series of hudnas. to let each side catch their breath and rearm. Just as the Spanish faced in the reconquesta.
Hudnas in La Reconquista: The “temporary truce” wasn’t significant. The fanatics would meet a few challenges, then get soft fast. Or they’d be overtaken by a determined coalition which would then sort the spoils.
So much myth is written as history, deliberately in the case of Spain. Christians fighting Moors for 800 years to a final victory is an inspiring story, but it’s not even close to accurate. Episodic at best. Till the final couple hundred years. And then, mostly by default.
Andalus disintegrated over centuries. At one time Islam controlled the entire peninsula except the extreme north. (Which hadn’t been worth much to the Romans either). Eventually, Vengo de los Visigodos! – ‘I’m a blue-blood Christian [since Christ],’ would become an identity worth fighting for.
The Moors had been weakening as a result of: 1) becoming civilized; 2) suffering invasions by savage, newly converted tribal North Africans; 3) the degeneracy inherent in that pirate-shaped, slash & burn, worst-ever form of social organization.
Feudal kingdoms would band together irrespective of religion to fight a frisky common foe. Maybe an aggressive young Christian just inheriting his domain, or the periodic surge of Berbers from North Africa.
Mixed populations characterized the towns, with Christianity expanding south slowly. There was trade. There were also long periods of quiet, broken by ordinary skirmishes, plague, and famine-riots.
By the end of the 15th century, the Moorish rulers were weak and dissolute, no longer a formidable foe. When Isabel and Ferdinand married to unite the two major kingdoms, Castilla and Aragon, their intent was to personify ‘La Reconquista’. Nation-building around religious identity was critical; Catholicism would consolidate this heterogeneous population.
The Edict of Expulsion in 1492 was a capstone of a whole series of maneuvers. When the ruling Moors were finally pushed out, others who were poor and miserable converted.
Some Jews converted, others tried to negotiate by financing the infant Kingdom: its pomp and circumstance, the voyages of discovery, the first dictionary of a Romance language.
But the Jews who would not convert had to go. To ferret out insincere converts, the Dominican friar Torquemada – the Confessor to Isabel – was named Inquisitor General. With his Jewish background he knew all the tricks.
The machinery of persecution was more enduring than the Jews against whom it was created. An ironic legacy.
Yikes! Why should I care so much about Spain and getting it right? Today's ethnic Spaniards care less or not at all…Because you are proud of your heritage and want the history books to tell the truth not the romanticized fiction.
I think the hundred year war lasted about 80s some odd years and it wasn’t continual fighting, there were years and in at least one case a decade of peace during that long war. Some historians are saying that WWI and WWII were one long war with a two decade pause in the fighting.
The Cold War was a 50+ year conflict with periodic bouts of hot war that racked up more combat dead then occured during WWII.
This was a case of me not explaining what I was seeing because it seemed so clear to me that what I say was the only way it could happen. I do this at times, usually jumping from point a to point d or further down without explaining the (clear to me) intervening steps.
There’s a good case to be made for WWII as a continuation of WWI. Then link the Cold War to Yalta, for example, or the Zaibatsu of Japan, or the boardrooms of Swiss banks.
Fascinating to imagine how this time will look in 800 years.
It is fascinating to think about what future historians will make of this.
Another war to link with others, The Russo Japanese war can be considered to be the beginning of the Japanese conquest of China. Which makes it the beginnings of WWI and WWII in the Pacific. If I had more time and money it would be fascinating to research that time period and write a series of books on the war/s in China from 1900 to the loss of China to Mao.
That is what I was talking about, the breaks between rounds of fighting can last weeks, months, years or decades but the fighting will restart. The length of time will depend on who is willing to fight and who isn’t, remember I have said many times this war will last at least until the 21st Century. The first part of this war will be when China and NK make their move, the US will have to concentrate most of our existing and rapidly expanded military force to contain and then push back against them. This will mean that Europe will be facing massive numbers of invaders who are bringing weapons out of the mosques. Eventually all nations will fight and some will manage to remove the invaders. We will see many native Europeans refugeeing out with governments in exile and various Free (not in the homeland) armies that are dependent on their host nations for weapons and training. This mess will exist initially during civil wars in the Western nations started by the left who are attempting to destroy their native political opponents before turning on their Islamic allies. Rather like how Mao in China was supposedly our ally against Japan bur rarely attacked them letting the nationalists bear the brunt (well over 95%) of the fighting. Mao was preserving his troops to fight the nationalists after Japan was defeated. And in Yugoslavia the communist guerillas spent his much time fighting the non communist rebels as they did fighting the Nazi’s.
I don’t expect this conquest to take 800 years to reverse but 80 to 150 years sounds about right. This is assuming there isn’t a nuclear exchange in the Middle East and between Incia and China. Once nukes start flying between any two nations the other nations in the region that have nukes will be faced with the very real possibility of use them or lose them. In this case the length of the wars is going to be either much shorter or much longer.
To our nukes, they had the Black Death that changed everything.
I bet the first nukes will hit somebody or other’s electrical grid[s], one or a series of EMP attacks.
A freighter-launched missle off the East Coast, aimed high over the New York – Washington D.C. corridor would take down the Swamp grid.
Probably low level EMP strikes since a high altitude strike would take out the com and nav sats they depend on as much as we do. But your idea would work. My big worry is for a fairly large nuke to be fastened onto the bottom of a freighter and then detonated in the middle of one of our large harbors.
“We’ll never be free until we separate from the Tards.”
The problem being is that Islam will still continue to make incursions against the West at every point of contact. There is absolutely no reason to tolerate this constant predation.
The world’s Muslim population must be given one (and only one choice):
Abandon jihad or die.
The threat must be existential or it will be meaningless to those Muslims it is most important to reach. As Brigitte Gabriel is so fond of pointing out, “peaceful Muslims are irrelevant!” Acts of jihad must become punishable by death.
Those Muslim countries that do not prosecute acts of jihad as capital crimes must be regarded as declaring war against the West and treated accordingly.
The only heartening thing arising from this article is seeing yet one more person finally equating Islam and Islamism. It is a distinction without a difference, just as with Islamists, jihadists, radicals, fundamentalists, ISIS, ISIL, PLO, Hamas, Hezbollah, or whatever other spoonful of alphabet soup that the sewers of Islam pour forth.
This must be a war to the finish. Islam is the one that refuses to grant anything but a temporary cessation of violence. Ergo, there must be unending violence against Islam until its very existence is at stake. When that point is reached, whatever Muslims are left can start talking about restructuring their doctrine so that it no longer poses any threat to the West.
If they are incapable of doing that, then they need to die as well. Maybe then we will have peace. Until then, we won’t. It’s that simple.
You are right, we have to break the Moslems from jihad for some (hopefully long) period of time, I have doubts that we will ever be able to totally remove the idea of jihad while there are any Moslems still believing in their religion.