About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

30 Replies to “How did the jihadis in Benghazi know when and where to strike, and know it would face minimal resistance?”

  1. That is a real good possibility.

    With the emails ending up on Weiners laptop what other location did Huma send them to? Will we ever know? Will the Dems ever admit the crimes committed by Clinton and company?

    • To the Muslim Brotherhood, dealing with the Americans must be like playing poker with an opponent whose cards are all dealt face up. The Americans make a move. The Muslims look over at the face-up cards to see if they are bluffing or not. The Americans get clobbered every time. The fact that the FBI and half the Republicans can’t seem to grasp that is proof that something is rotten in the State of Denmark.

      Just the fact that Huma was not disowned by her family is proof enough that they are running an operation. There’s no way her parents would be OK with their beloved daughter marrying a Jew.

      • Or having sex with another woman. They are the type of Moslems that wouid gleefully commit a Honor Killing.

        From the reports of the rebellion among the FBI agents it looks like some of them (probably most of them) are fed up with the Cultural Marxism BS that they are having ot put up with. It will be interesting to see what else is going to come out and if the Rebellion of the FBI will spread to other departments and agencies.

        • Is carnal knowledge between women considered homosexuality according to the koran?
          It isn’t recognized as such by many strict constructionists of the Bible.

          • You know, come to think of it, I never heard anything about lesbianism in the Quran or the Hadiths, and I’ve never really heard of them throwing dykes off high buildings or anything. What difference would it make to Muhammad? Frankly, I don’t think he gave a rat’s posterior one way or the other…

            And besides, what else are all those harem girls supposed to do waiting for the great man to get around to them – especially when they are fifty plus and the new girl is twenty-two, and looks like Taylor Swift…? Ouch! I guess you’d become “the floor-cleaning potato peeling wife, then”. Oh, goody! Good thing they have the Saudis heading up all those UN international human rights organizations. We might run into an hypocrisy shortage without them…

      • What could be more persuasive that Huma’s 100% kosher than having her marry a repulsive Jew? How could anyone suspect the loyalty of a woman who defies her upbringing so egregiously? Could there be a more perfect cover?

        There’s no way she would’ve survived the wrath of her family if the marriage had not been their initiative. She’s the biggest asset ever planted, a monstrous sacrifice, a noble martyr.

        The MB play a long game. They got to Check, but not yet Mate.

        • Add to that the fact that she isn’t estranged from her family at all and you have two plus two equalling five. There’s no way in hell a Muslim Brotherhood princess like that could possibly marry a Jew without causing World War III among her relatives. An honor killing would not be out of the question. It’s got to be espionage, plain and simple…

        • I saw Weiner briefly on a talk show and he seemed a very funny fellow. Makes him kind of hard to hate. He’s got chutzpah on his chutzpah…

          And, no. There couldn’t really be a better cover than marrying a Jew. Reminds me of the 9/11 bombers going to bars and drinking a lot before the event. I can just hear the Infidels saying, “They can’t be terrorists. They drink beer and chase girls just like us…”. Aren’t they the tricky ones…?

        • She was a great asset for them, hopefully more will come out proving this in the new Wiki leaks or on the laptop.

    • But that still doesn’t explain how they knew that an Apache Longbow attack helicopter or an AC-130 gunship wouldn’t show up and kill every single one of them in about ten seconds. The US had been flying missions in the area. The US does have the best military in the world. How did the Jihadists know they could attack unimpeded?

      I wonder how Davy Crockett and Daniel Boone would feel about a President who knew the Alamo was under attack, had a cavalry unit on standby in the area, but just didn’t bother to send it in because it might conflict with his narrative in the upcoming election? Would Jim Bowie have been OK with that? How about George Washington? Jefferson? Ben Franklin? JFK? Eisenhower? Daffy Duck? Mickey Mouse? Bullwinkle? Rocky?

      They’re going to have to build a prison the size of Texas to fit all the traitorous Democrats when this is over…

    • It was also 9-11 at a dozen or more other exposed embassy annexes all over the Islamic world. But they knew just when Amb. Stevens, who is based hundreds of miles away in Tripoli, would physically be in that dangerously exposed secret villa/compound. And they knew how pitiful the local security was, because State farmed out the around-the-wall security to a “moderate” local muslim militia group. Yep.

      • State farmed out the around-the-wall security to a “moderate” local muslim militia group.

        Why is it that so little political hay has been made out of this egregious lack of screening? Is it just that BOTH parties have been gulled into believing that something so preposterous as “moderate” Islam even exists, or are they all really just dumber than a bag of hair?!?

  2. And they attacked because of that, not because they knew that the embassy was weakly defended.

    • Shaving with Occam’s Razor doesn’t always give the correct answer.

      Yes it was Sept 11 but the odds are that they knew how weak the defense was. This doesn’t mean that Huma was their source of info but it also doesn’t mean she wasn’t. When you are attacking a position that is even semi fortified and defended you find out all you can before the attack. We already know it was a planned attack and we know that the people involved do recognizance and search for other intell.

      Ignoring the obvious is a sign of a lazy mind.

    • No doubt they had a dozen high-value targets scoped out. Real-time information on all of them, juggling which to hit till the last-minute decision. We have so very many vulnerabilities, we’re offering a terrorists’ buffet.

    • Have you ever seen an Apache in action? The enemy is dead so fast they probably are not even aware of dying. There wouldn’t even be time to get out one little, “Allahu Akbar”… It looks like sparklers going off, except that each “sparkler” is a grenade travelling at supersonic speed. Kind of a light, airy, Christmassy feel. Maybe they should play jingly sleigh bells over the loudspeakers…

      • During the Gulf War the pilots bombing the Iraqis were quoted as saying, “It’s all lit up – it looks like Christmas!”
        I read about it in an Egyptian paper’s English version. They were incensed, said we “dehumanized the Arab people”.

          • One of the reasons we are now having a much higher percentage of soldiers get PTSD us that the left doesn’t let them use dehumanizing slang about the enemy.

            You know like Kruts, Japs (WWII) Gooks, Slopes (Korea and Nam) Ragheads (the various wars in the Middle East.

            • That’s a very important weapon for our arsenal. Something I heard many times from the old soldiers around the dinner table. Greatly superior to “shoot before you’re shot.”

      • The Apache and Spooky are impressive when they are in action, with Spooky there aren’t any body pieces large enough to identify as human. If they are using tracers it is a light show that has to be seen to be believed.