About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

6 Replies to “Waltzing Matilda does the halal two step”

  1. The financial markets would sell you sex-toys for children if it was made halal by the socialists. As Donald Trump unashamedly admitted, as a businessman he had Elected Officials in his pocket. If he didn’t, this unchallenged meme goes, someone else would.

    So halal certifying gets your cheap products into an undiscerning market.

    If there is a more conscious market out there, you won’t have to find them, they will find you. You will however, have to suffer all manner of hate and lothing from the fastest religion of uptake of smokers.

    In hospital I ate kosher. Nutritionally, vastly superior food to all the other pretenders supplied at the time. This might be the market to expand into beyond the beer and pork scratchings you have left.

    • “No method of slaughtering or handling in connection with slaughtering shall be deemed to comply with the public policy of the United States unless it is humane. Either of the following two methods of slaughtering and handling are hereby found to be humane:

      (a) in the case of cattle, calves, horses, mules, sheep, swine, and other livestock, all animals are rendered insensible to pain by a single blow or gunshot or an electrical, chemical or other means that is rapid and effective, before being shackled, hoisted, thrown, cast, or cut; or

      (b) by slaughtering in accordance with the ritual requirements of the Islamic and Jewish faith or any other religious faith that prescribes a method of slaughter whereby the animal suffers loss of consciousness by anemia of the brain caused by the simultaneous and instantaneous severance of the carotid arteries with a sharp instrument and handling in connection with such slaughtering.”

      “Jhatka or Chatka meat (Hindi: ???? jha?k? IPA: [d????k?]; Punjabi: ???? (Gurmukhi), ????? (Shahmukhi) chà?k? IPA: [t????k?]; from Sanskrit gh?taka “killing”) is meat from an animal that has been killed by a single strike of a sword or axe to sever the head, as opposed to ritualistically slow slaughter (kutha) like the Jewish slaughter (shechita) or Islamic slaughter (dhabihah). It is the method preferred by many Hindus, Sikhs, and Christians.[1]”

      The slow neck-cut dripping in hot countries was a sad necessity to get the heart to pump out the blood if you wanted meat not to spoil quickly, and the Jews further soak their prepared meat in brine to remove every last drop.

      My kosher fish I ate in hospital was excellent, though unstunned when asphyxiated exiting from the sea. The higher mammals I demand to have a little more respect for to become the meat on my table.

      A Jewish argument against stunning is the animal is injured, therefore not perfect at the first incision, (which it won’t be by the last incision).

      Why the least conscious always get a shout is simply because there are just more of them, and their mob get to vote.

      • I can see from this that if there was a religious group that felt the right way to kill animals was to beat them to death with a handful of rocks, the US would include that as well.

  2. The video made me think of my own concerns about the extent to which 5 (25 ?) % of the UK population is shaping our food supplies with the sickening collusion of our large food retailers. I always look for the halal label but when I have asked questions I get blank looks. There ought to be a nationwide campaign to have all food clearly labelled so we can make an informed choice.
    Additionally, there needs to be a massive campaign to ban the who halal slaughter thing in the UK, Europe, Australia and everywhere else in the west. It might be a small start, but it would make the colonists feel less welcome if they could not gorge on halal meat.

    • If Britain does have an Islamic population of 25% you are in massive trouble, most experts say you need 1/3rd of the population to support a revolution for it to succeed but some put that number as low as 1/4th. 5% is also cause for alarm since you only need 5% of the population to support a terror campaign for it to last many years. Off the top of my head I have never heard of a terror campaign that succeeded without having a lot of politicians support the goals of the terrorists.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *