Translation by Oz-Rita
More information @ Islam V Europe
From In-nocence
Communiqué n° 1527 Thursday 7 February 2013
[France 2 is THE major TV source in France. It is state run, and equivalent of BBC or CBC etc. Eeyore]
On a stunning (astounding?) reportage from France 2
The “In-nocence” party is thrilled to bits that France 2, (if we can believe the astounding (stunning?) reportage broadcast in their evening news on Wednesday 6.2.2013) has somehow single-handedly solved the whole problem of the “Big Replacement” and the different “nocences” (*) that are connected with it. Firstly in that short documentary, they evoked the impressive series of violence and aggressions which had resulted in a far less impressive series of closures of all kind of shops, shopping centers, chemists, tobacconists, green grocers, butchers and shopping malls, in this so-called “sensitive” suburb.
Then came the wonderful solution, observed and implicitly praised in this reportage by the example of a shopping mall, founded, owned and managed by a young Turkish entrepreneur: no more aggression, this enterprise attracts no threats or menaces whatsoever and is allowed to prosper peacefully. The young entrepreneur explained with admirable candor that, as long as the different shops and commercial premises are owned, managed and tenanted by people who share the same origin (or even the same religion, because he himself is Turkish?) with the majority of inhabitants of these neighborhoods, there would be no more violence and the risk of closures would be avoided.
“We have watched all those robberies, thefts and aggressions and that is where I said, if it was me who owned those shops, these problems would not exist”.
A tremendous admission which means that the cause for the “nocence”(*) is of ethnic or “communitarian” origin, not of social origin, as the “Friends of the Disaster“ always like to pretend: the change in the management of these businesses does not change the social situation of the “nocents“(*).
So, with the blessing of France 2, the remedy against the evils caused by the “Big Replacement” is found: all that is left to do is to apply it to the very end. Once everyone will have been replaced, civil peace will return. Once there will only be “sensitives” left in the Sensitive suburbs, public order will be restored like by enchantment and there will no longer exist the tiniest motif for anyone to close shop and leave.
We imagine that meanwhile, the presence of natives is perceived as a provocation.
(*) I don’t know the word “nocent“ and could not find it in my dictionary. So I imagine that this is a word play. The site calls itself: “In-nocent“ – so “nocent“ could suggest “guilty“?…or at least the opposite of what the site considers itself to be. .
no·cent …….adj.
Causing injury; harmful.
[Middle English nocent, guilty, from Latin nocns, nocent-, present participle of nocre, to harm; see nek-1 in Indo-European roots.]
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nocent
Yes, In-Nocence = Non-Harmfulness. Thanks for subtitling this video.
Definition of NOCENT
: harmful
Not heard this word before.
End result:
Replacement of People who muslims want to harm with those they do not want to harm. Or to put it another way: colonization.
Businesses not belonging to the majority local community are trashed, then at a later date taken over.
We’ve seen this process before: Kristallnacht.
A new phase of the conquest of Europe has begun, now we will see how many will resist and how many will become slaves.
Those who understand they are not all powerful and their countries can fall and their people could be wiped out will resist (though perhaps not in time to save themselves). Those who do not resist will appease as they still believe in their superiority and indestructibility and permanence of their prosperity.