Multiculturalism ‘past its sell-by date’ warns race expert

The Telegraph:

 Using taxpayers’ money to fund projects run by religious or ethnic community groups is turning Britain into a divided society, the author of the report on the Oldham riots has warned.

Professor Ted Cantle said that the idea of multiculturalism in Britain is often doing more harm than good.

Professor Ted Cantle said that the idea of multiculturalism in Britain is often doing more harm than good.  Photo: Craig Stennett/The Daily Telegraph

By , Social Affairs Editor

7:00AM BST 15 Sep 2012

Prof Ted Cantle said that the idea of multiculturalism in Britain is now “well past its sell-by date” and is often doing more harm than good.

He accused the Government of fuelling separation in communities rather than bringing people together by allowing small groups to claim “special status” – and with it funding – amounting to a form of state-sponsored segregation.

Councils and police are also giving undue legitimacy to “self-appointed leaders” in some areas by inviting them to endless meetings and consulting them on their views and allowing them to become “gatekeepers to their communities”, he warned.

Click to continue:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

16 Replies to “Multiculturalism ‘past its sell-by date’ warns race expert”

  1. It is weird how how those moslems are known to be so possessive about their islamic faith or their islamic god, invited certain nonbelievers of islam to celebrate their islamic celebration. So, what are their motives for asking certain nonbelievers of islam to join in their islamic celebration? Is it to do with for their islamic prostelization or islamic agenda or publicity for their islamic faith? Perhaps,any publicity is good pubicity for them.

  2. Anyway, I think those islamic celebration dinner are more to do with spreading their totalitarian islamic political agenda and to gain support for their many selfish islamic agenda or horrible islamic leaderships.

  3. On the subject of our Dhimmified Police (Force? – Service?) it is worth noting that ACPO, the ‘Association of Chief Police Officers’, is a Private Limited Company and as such it is not subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act as are other executive branches of government.

    It is in effect a secret society and yet it sees fit and is able to dictate to the UK police forces how they will apply the law (Common Law as interpreted through Statute Law) on the ground.

    Indeed it was they who defined what precisely constituted a RRHTD (Racist, Religious, Homophobic, Transphobic or Disability) ‘hate crime’ thus:

    “Any criminal offence which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race.

    Any criminal offence which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person’s religion or perceived religion.

    Any criminal offence which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person’s sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation.

    Any criminal offence which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice against a person who is transgender perceived to be transgender.

    Any criminal offence which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person’s disability or perceived disability.”

    Note “perceived, by the victim OR ANY OTHER PERSON!” Orwellian or what?

    Note also the inclusion of the last three ‘victim groups’ in order to give a veneer of human decency to legislation that is designed to provide protection solely for the benefit of the one invasive racial/religious group alluded to in the first two grouping yet never really mentioned by name.

    Well, whilst Islam is neither a race nor a religion – it is a barbaric theocratic political system – by designating it as either as a racial and/or religious group these laws prevent or punish any open discussion, or response, to our ongoing ethnic cleansing in the name of ‘multiculturism’.

    George must be looking on wide eyed from his grave as our ruling classes bring his prophecy, 1984, into a very real and dark existence, albeit a little later than projected.

  4. Please clarify, Fred. Ambiguous one-liners contribute little or nothing to the debate and in these interesting times the dialectic does require a little more of all of us: if I may be so presumptuous.

    Rgds, S III.

  5. Hello,

    Beware of the decoy, it is not so much about multiculturalism than about Islam, few people receive any treat from jews, hindus, sikhs or whatever non muslims come by.

    Multiculturalism could mean bringing Islam at diner when it woud not be invited alone, who would dare to forbid the whole diversity in order to stop islam? This PC concept renders islam invisible till it reaches the center of the castle it has entered by stealth.

    Beside it is way more complicated fighting multiculti than a singled out murderous cult, one feels he can deal with multiculti stripped from violence after removing Islam.

    So the term multiculturalism is a dangerous newspeak word used by a governement official meaning in fact Islam .

  6. A multicultural nation may just work as long as there is an abundance of goodies to go around. But once hard times come, as they must, it will lead to increasing competition, leading to low grade civil war, and finally war itself. Now times are getting hard by the day. This is despite the government printing money- no, thats not true. They dont even bother wasting paper by printing money. They simply add a few hundred billion to the electronic Treasury books, and then buy Treasury bonds with it, or loan it to banks. Sooner or later, these toxic pigeons will come home to roost, and then we will see Greek scenes in Britain. It is then that immigrants will be attacked, as they are in Greece.
    I do not wish to see our reputation for tolerance and fair play tarnished because of the vanity and stupidity of politicians. Somehow the problem has to be solved.

  7. ‘Past its sell-by date’ ……I’d say EXPIRED, unfit for most humans. Anytime policies lead to separation or the superiority of one group over another, especially a minority over a majority, it becomes toxic. And we are living in a toxic , MC, hell right now. It is time for the rightful owners of this society, the ones who built it and whose ancestors died to secure its freedoms to take it back and respect it and love it once again instead of this deformed,toxic mess it has been manipulated into by liberals & their demented ilk.

  8. Even if multiculturalism did not expire by itself, islam will still destroy multiculturalism bit by bit via aggresively subtle and blatant islamisation, ie. via the excessove deamnds of islamics and the excessive pandering to islamics culture. That is what is happenning in many parts of asia which falsely tried to claim multicultural status when in fact it is being overwhelmed by subtle islamisation. When one hear a moslem supporting multiculturalism, he or she is most probably using other culture to push for their islamisation agenda.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*