Russia TV covers Geert Wilders and immigration issues in the Netherlands

I haven’t watched this all yet so I don’t know the spin yet. But here it is for those who want to see how RT covers Geert.

Thanks Don L (I think it was) who sent this to me

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

8 Replies to “Russia TV covers Geert Wilders and immigration issues in the Netherlands”

  1. He says that if it’s clean you can pray there? Funny, I didn’t think that Muslims cared if anything was clean or not, judging by their own personal standards of hygiene!
    Of course, I forget that in the World of Muzz, ‘clean’ has a different meaning. To normal human beings, clean means washed or hygienic in a physical sense, or good, lawful or holy in a spiritual sense.
    To a Muzz, clean means compliant with the twisted ethics of their paedo prophet. So I would see a bacon sandwich being eaten by a self-respecting well-groomed individual as being clean, whereas Mr. Muzz would see an unwashed hairy-faced, shitty-arsed, AIDS ridden, boy-sodomizer beating a defenseless woman as being clean.
    No wonder the two worlds are incompatible!

  2. Here we find in their own words the greatest argument against the cancer of both islam and its handmaiden, multiculturalism.

    They have no intention of integrating, never had, do not now and never will. To the muslims this is simply a matter of conquest.

    Regards, Don Laird
    Edson, Alberta, Canada

  3. The radio station at 15:00 is very multicultural….it has programs for every culture except the native dutch.

  4. Softly Bob

    have not you heard of the islamic toilet behaviour?

    It is very clean but goes beyond obsession..

  5. The west is not defined by your particular idea of England and therefore i don’t see why we in England, Muslim or not, should define ourselves by stereotypes of the west as people like you want to believe it exists.

    Just on female Islamic dress I want to repeat this fact. In 1970s Afghanistan, before the US intervened, only aristocratic women wore Burkhas. Most women went to work wearing black pencil skirts and white blouses in the cities, and traditional Afghan garb in the country. The country was backward by British standards but it was 1950s backward, not 1550s.

    Today in ‘liberated Afghanistan’ feminist-activists have to wear the burkha for self-protection from the misogynist thugs we – the occupying forces- have put in power.
    It’s 916 years since the first Christian crusade to battle infidel Islam. It’s only 84 years since women had equal voting right in Britain. If we now hate Islam for treating women badly, then, what were the previous 832 years about? It smacks of hypocrisy and opportunism. Guess what, women in the UK still don’t get an equal wage and there aren’t an equal number of women in Parliament or our boardrooms. Maybe we should fix that now so we can better criticise Islamic nations? All too often I see the Islamophobes who joyfully criticise Islam for it’s supposed denigration of women and gays slag off muslims, while at the same time making homophobic and misogynist comments on other threads. Hypocritical opportunism.

    I bet my last pound that the ‘terrorist suspect’ who stopped a Megabus on the M6 by the suspicious activity of smoking an electronic cigarette is a person of colour and an example of islamophobia.
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamic.sorg.uk

  6. The crux of the matter is that: if muslims deem that the west is so incongruous with islam’s way of life & ideology why stay & live there…try saudi or any other place of the ‘umma’ to dwell then, have a self-dignity will u: u don’t like it there in the west, u feel that it’s so unholy hence it doesn’t suit ur ‘religion of peace’ teachings then, TAKE A HIKE! Simple as that…

  7. I have been engaged in Jihad in the field of education for the last forty years. I set up the first Muslim school in London in 1981 and now there are round about 170 schools and only 12 are state funded. Muslim children are not doing well in state schools because they have been mis- educated and de-educated at a wrong place at a wrong time. They need state funded Muslim schools with Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental periods.

    They need to learn and be well versed in standard English to follow the National Curiculm and go for higher studies and research to serve humanity. At the same time they need to learn and be well versed in Arabic, Urdu and other community languages to keep in touch with their cultural heritage and enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry. As far As English language is concerned, nobody is denying its value and focus should be on helping people learning English. Migrant community believes that an English language skill is key to ensuring equal access to services, opportunities and personal independence. The economic and social survival of bilingual Muslim community depends on English language but not at the cost of its mother tongue. It is a crime against humanity to deprive a community from its native tongue and cultural heritage. Muslim community is bilingual and does not believe in becoming monolingual Brits. Children that can speak more than one languages do better overall in learning and it will help them excel in a job when they are older. Only an idiot would think that being bi/trilingual is a bad thing. I think its great to be surrounded by foreign languages. There are plenty of benefits to learning them, it increases memory and other brain functions, looks great on a job résumé, and most importantly allows you to connect with a different culture and make new friends. Now is the time to teach them all the different languages you want to because they will just soak up the information. As we get older it becomes harder and harder to retrain our brains to learn a new language.

    Tolerance in Britain is an illusion. The problem isn’t immigrants not adapting to British culture, it’s Brits showing much disrespect and scorn to those who are of any immigrant background. even if an immigrant was well versed in English, knew the customs etc. would they still get employment? No. Would Brits treat them as a decent human? No.

    So why would they want to assimilate into a culture that is constantly tearing them down?

    There are now four state funded Sikh schools and one state funded Hindu school in Harrow and next year a Hindu state funded Muslim schools would be set up in Leicester. Even black community is thinking of setting up its own schools with its own teachers because British schooling is the home of institutional racism.

    I’m not sure how learning English will help stop extremism either, many of those who have carried out/plotted atrocities have been highly educated. Speaking English does not promote integration into British society, and broaden opportunities. English speaking Muslims still face discrimination in jobs, education and housing. English speaking Muslim youths are angry, frustrated and extremist, thanks to English language. English language is not only a lingua franca but also lingua frankensteinia. Human right also covers linguistic right. Cultural and linguistic genocide are very common. British schooling is murdering community languages like Arabic, Urdu and others. English is today the world killer language. Linguistic genocide is a crime against humanity and British schooling is guilty of committing this crime.

    There are hundreds of state and church schools where Muslim children are in majority. In my opinion, all such schools may be opted out as Muslim Academies.
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk