German Court Bans Circumcision of Young Boys

I wonder when they will ban the use of cut men in porn films?

From Shalom Life:

Jewish and Muslim groups outraged over ruling
By: Sammy Hudes
Published: June 27th, 2012 in News » World

Jewish “Bris” ceremonyPic: Illustration
A German court in Cologne ruled that circumcising young boys infringes on their right to be protected from grievous bodily harm on Tuesday, causing outrage from Jewish and Muslim groups who were upset with the ruling, according to multiple reports.The decision came in the case of a doctor who was prosecuted for circumcising a four-year-old Muslim boy, who just two days later had to be treated post-operative bleeding, according to the Toronto Star. But the court found that the child’s “fundamental right to bodily integrity” was more important than his parents’ fundamental rights to religious freedom, the New York Times reported. The hospital doctor who treated the boy for the injury later called the police, but the doctor who performed the circumcision was acquitted because there was no law banning religious circumcision at the time. The court ruled that the religious freedom “would not be unduly impaired” as the child would later have the option of deciding whether or not to have the circumcision. “The religious freedom of the parents and their right to educate their child would not be unacceptably compromised, if they were obliged to wait until the child could himself decide to be circumcised,” the court added. No age restriction or any specific details were given. The ruling will only apply to the Cologne area, but many fear that some doctors may now decline to do the procedure due to the possibility of charges brought upon them.

Click to continue:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

10 Replies to “German Court Bans Circumcision of Young Boys”

  1. Columnist:

    That was my first thought as well. Muslims of course ignore ‘man made law’ as they are so fond of saying when they want to sound superior for doing whatever the hell they want. Also, Muslims will create their own environment to do this in, and defend that space with force. I would suspect a mosque or islamic ‘community center’. At the end of the day whether it was intended to be selectively enforced against the Jews or not, (possible) it will be. This is my suspicion.

  2. Columnist you make a very good point. Thank you

    I would add to this if it isn’t actually enforced on Islam this will also give more ammunition to Islam to fight the west. The only way to enforce this on Islam is to raid Mosques which isn’t going to happen “yet.”

  3. Multiculturalism involves a level of complexity which cannot be understood from the prospective of any single discipline. Instead, historical, cultural, linguistic, political, economic, educational, sociological and psychological factors and processes all play critical role.

    Multiculturalism is not about integration but about cultural plurality. It is not about separation but about respect and the deepening awareness of Unity in Diversity. Each culture will maintain its own intrinsic value and at the same time would be expected to contribute to the benefit of the whole society. Multiculturalism can accommodate diversity of all kinds – cultural, philosophical and religious – so that we can create a world without conflict and strife. Britain can assume the role of accommodation and concern for all peoples, for our planet and indeed for our survival. We live in a rapidly changing world. If you attack the burqa, you attack the right of women to choose their own clothing. Respect the right of women how to dress.I respect women’s rights. Nobel Peace Prize winner “Tawakkul Karman,” ‘The mother of Yemen’s revolution,’ when asked about her Hijab by journalists and how it is not proportionate with her level of intellect and education, replied: “Man in early times was almost naked, and as his intellect evolved he started wearing clothes. What I am today and what I’m wearing represents the highest level of thought and civilization that man has achieved, and is not regressive. It’s the removal of clothes again that is a regression back to the ancient times. Veil is a sign of woman liberation from Current Naked liberalism, unethical fashion, social harassment, over consciousness about figure etc and become a sex icon and toy of the troy. In very cold winter people walk about with scarves tightly wrapped around their face. In those cases no security issue arises, but the wearing of burqa raises security concern. Burqa is worn as a matter of choice. Nowadays young women choose to wear full veil seeing it as a powerful statement of identity, The parliaments of various European countries are voting to legislate the banning of the veils, In Switzerland a ban on minarets was imposed. The campaign against Islamic symbols is on the rise because of a sense of insecurity in some Europeans. A ban on the burqa is bound to widen the differences rather than bridging them. It will just encourage discrimination against Muslims in European society.

  4. I am starting to understand Iftikhar Ahmad goal.

    When a socialist news reporter, politician and so on reads these posts the only one that fits the socialistic narrative is the only Muslim on the site. Everyone else is against the ‘greater good.’

  5. @Iftikhar. Whats the matter now? Did somebody piss in your cereal this morning? BTW, did you have Cocoa Puffs for breakfast or is that goat poo in your beard? Goat’s milk too? Come on now, thats taking the diversity thing a little too far! Ewww!!

    No more cereal for you Iffy!!


  6. muslims have been mutilating their little girls for years, they ignored that, they do what the hell they want, constantly pushing boundaries like spoilt children. because muslims are justifiably now hated so much by anyone but communists, Jews will now suffer, loosing kosher meat and safe male circumcision that they have practiced for centuries in the west without upsetting anyone.

  7. Iftikhar Ahmed is himself a brown circumcised man. I met a man like Iftikhar Ahmed who who told me of all the benefits of being genitally mutilated. I was not impressed. Thank God I am the way God made me. I wonder if Allah will give back the foreskin of muslims when they enter paradise. I read in one of the hadiths that Allah keeps the foreskins for when his finest enter paradise and then puts them back on. Then they are ready to go at their white faced and doe eyed virgins. What a religion! If I were Allah I would get off my throne and have a look at the foreskin of Iftkhar Ahmed and make a firm commitment not to let this man into heaven and destroy his foreskin forever. Inshallah!

  8. Everything in Islam is for Heaven. Yet, they still complain when they are killed. And still they think they need taqiyya to save their hides. Weird, weird.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.