Once again, the Western world, led by Great Britain, shows the world what both totalitarianism looks like as well as the inability to recognize the difference between an ideology and a race.
Had this gentleman had a ton of literature about say, how evil white people are in his window, to a degree I can understand why there might be laws resulting in incarceration although I still think that qualifies as free speech. But he didn’t. He had material about how evil and dangerous and barbaric Nazism is. This is an ideology.
Wait sorry, it wasn’t material about Russians, it was about communism which again, is a dangerous and lethal totalitarian ideology which killed 100 million people in peacetime.
So sorry, my mistake. It wasn’t a diatribe against Japanese people. It was his attempt to warn the people about Shinto, the dangerous ideology/religion that motivated the Japanese people to try and take over the world by force.
It wasn’t issues with Arabs. It was an expose on the clearly insane, racist, hate filled, incitement to genocide, demand-to-take-over-the-whole-world-and-destroy-it-in-the process, ISLAM
Eeyore for Vlad:
A GAINSBOROUGH man who plastered his front window with vile anti-Islamic hate literature has been jailed for a year.
Darren Conway, a self-confessed supporter of right-wing organisations, was given a 12-months’ sentence at Lincoln Crown Court.
JAILED: Darren Conway.
The court was told on Tuesday that carer Conway had covered the front window of his ground floor flat in Heaton Street in Gainsborough with 17 photographs and posters.
Many were offensive – attacking both the prophet Mohammed and the Muslim religion.
Conway, 44, had denied displaying the religiously aggravated hate material on April 16 last year.
But he was convicted following a short trial earlier this year, when sentencing was postponed for reports to be prepared.
Judge Michael Heath told Conway: “To describe the material you put in your window as grossly offensive is an understatement.
“There is no place in a civilised society for conduct of that sort and the only sentence I can justify for it is an immediate custodial sentence.”
Notice there is no mention of what the material is, or if it was true or not. As that no longer matters clearly. And, like Islamic blasphemy laws themselves, the judges cannot look at the evidence because Muslims may not look at blasphemous material, we may not look at what he posted in his window. We have to just accept the adjectives of the journalist here even though it is likely, as seems the case most of the time, this ‘hate literature’ is actually an expose of Islam as hate literature itself.