Also, more here: How gangs force young girls into sexual slavery:
*****UPDATE***** Video
From the daily mail:
By Paul Sims
Last updated at 11:58 AM on 6th November 2010
A gang of Asian ‘sexual predators’ were jailed yesterday for abusing white girls as young as 12.
The five men preyed on their victims over several months and threatened them with violence if they refused their advances.
One of the men branded his victim a ‘white bitch’ when she resisted, while a second smirked: ‘I’ve used you and abused you.’
Mohsin Khan, 21, left (jailed for four years) and Razwan Razaq, 30 (jailed for 11 years) were convicted of a string of sexually related offences against girls as young as 12
Umar Razaq, 24, left (jailed for four and a half years) and Zafran Ramzan, 21 (jailed for nine years), prowled the streets looking for girls, attacking them in parks and in the back of their cars
Adil Hussain, 20, was jailed for four and a half years
The men, all British-born Pakistanis, attacked the four girls in play areas, parks and in the back of their cars, Sheffield Crown Court heard.
They gave them gifts and introduced them to their friends. The girls were abused so frequently that after many months it ‘became a way of life’.
The girls, who were being monitored by social services, were eventually rescued by police and removed from their homes amid growing concerns for their safety.
Two of the men wept in the dock yesterday as they were jailed.
Judge Peter Kelson QC told them: ‘I’ve listened to the backdrop of some of you sobbing – I have to say your weeping cuts no ice with me at all.
‘You had what you regarded as your fun, now you will take your punishment.’
The five, Umar Razaq, 24, Razwan Razaq, 30, Zafran Ramzan, 21, Adil Hussain, 20, and Mohsin Khan, 21, were found guilty of a string of sexually related offences against the girls, one aged 12, two aged 13 and one aged 16.
Ramzan was found guilty of raping the 16-year-old girl in her own home, and the other four were found guilty of sexual activity with a child.
Umar Razaq was jailed for four and a half years, while the judge gave Razwan Razaq 11 years.
More…
- £6.2m fortune of brothel baron funded a lavish house, cars and even a £40,000 number plate
- Vanessa George’s nursery provided ‘ideal’ environment for abuse: Staff were scared to challenge paedophile’s debauched behaviour
Ramzan was jailed for nine years, and Hussain and Khan both received four years. All five were placed on the sex offenders register. Three further men were cleared.
The attacks took place in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, during 2008, the court was told. Khan, a mortgage adviser who owned a BMW, described his victim as a ‘little stick’ who looked as if she had not reached puberty.
Despite this he told her he loved her and would spoil her like a ‘princess’.
During the seven-week trial the jury were told how the men drove around the streets looking for girls. The teenagers believed they were in relationships with the much older men.
On one occasion Umar Razaq tried to pull the clothes off one of the 13-year-olds.
When she resisted he pulled her hair and called her a ‘white bitch’.
On another occasion Umar introduced the girl to his brother Razwan who had sex with her in his car.
Afterwards he told her: ‘I’ve used you and abused you.’ When Ramzan was asked by police what age he was attracted to he later replied: ‘As long as they are not too young and they’re legal, that’s it.’
The authorities were alerted after some changes were noted in the behaviour of the victims and they were removed from their homes.
Joyce Thacker, director of Rotherham’s children and young people’s services, said the girls were under child protection plans following family breakdowns or other issues with their behaviour.
‘When we pieced together a map of what was happening we stepped in very quickly to move these girls to a place of safety outside Rotherham,’ she said.
‘It started off as a grooming exercise by the men who became friendly with the girls, gave them gifts and introduced them to their friends.
‘When they got used to being abused it just became a normal way of life for the girls. It is akin to self-harm.
‘It was very dangerous. The girls could have faced death if the men weren’t getting what they wanted.’
She said the girls’ parents bore some of the responsibility but they were in a difficult position and at a loss to do something about their children’s ‘alternative’ lifestyle.
Detective Sergeant Dave Walker, who led the inquiry, said: ‘One was only 12 when she met one of the men and started smoking cannabis and drinking and coming in late at night.
‘As it escalated the defendants were becoming more aggressive to the girls.
‘We basically have a group of young men who think it is all right to abuse young girls and they just groomed them and isolated them from their families.’
All four girls are now back in mainstream education. The three youngest are taking GCSEs and the eldest is at college.
Mr Walker added: ‘We don’t know what the future holds for them but it will be a lot better than it was.’
too lenient a punishment, those filthy monsters should be neutered. left to rot in prison for a while with some other prisoners making them his bitches, then executed.
Just Asian eh?
One of the tragedies in Britain, along with this one, is the continuous slander of all Asians. These types of absolutely horrendous crimes against White Infidel women and girls, is quite common in Europe, and is hidden under the umbrella of “hate” crimes at the best. Never, but never is the true motivation of these crimes is given- that is, the contempt of Muslims for women in general and Infidel women in particular.
Thank you DP111
I always wonder why various Asian and especially East Asian groups do not sue the media in Europe for using the term ‘Asian’ when the problem is Muslims.
Eeyore
Our Western ruling class just cannot get up the courage to recognise that the presence of Muslims in the West, is tearing our society. Over in the US, the Department of Defence and the CinC of the armed forces, Pres Obama, cannot admit that the massacre that took place at Fort Hood was Jihad, pure and simple. All manner of explanations are being offered- one of the most bizarre being that cousin marriages lead to violent behaviour. How that gene mutates to differentiate between Muslims and Kuffars, is now a matter of urgent research.
Its almost as if the entire ruling class in the West is congenitally incapable of recognising facts, and suffering from a bad case of “denial”. What has caused this, beats me. Fear of Islam and Muslims may be one reason. But as they have the state to safeguard them, unlike you and I, and also have the potential to simply obliterate all Islamic countries, if push comes to shove, this can hardly be the reason.
That leaves just one other explanation – they are so wedded to the philosophy that all cultures are the same, that giving it up would mean the destruction of the entire system of beliefs that has nurtured their whole lives. Thus they would rather die, and take their countries with them, then acknowledge that Islam is not a religion but a totalitarian ideology designed with the specific aim to destroy civilisations and cultures, and make them submit to allah and mohammed.
Call a spade a spade, mos-slums, not Asians.
On the use of the word “asian” to refer to mahound-worshippers, the UK is still sunk neck-deep in camel dung (thanks to its elites) when it comes to tearing down the wall of PC/MC suicidal nonsense shielding mahoundianism and its adherents from criticism… Though it’s encouraging to see the English Defense League slowly gaining momentum and growing in its efforts to change this, mainstream-media outlets and most British politicians are still bending over backwards to appease those bedouin savages.
This no longer seems to be the case in other parts of Europe… This article from Gates of Vienna has an interesting comment by GoV reader Yorkshireminer, which shows that indeed, as in the title of the post, change in Europe’s passivity towards the hordes of parasitical invading inbred bedouin savages is indeed coming to an end.
But, still regarding the UK, one thing that I’ve seen many people say is that ordinary folks’ anger at mahoundianism and those enabling it is building up without a whole lot of visible signs; and, when those signs do become visible, it will be through a massive explosion of outrage, fury and concrete actions. Knowing the little I know about British history, I have reasons to believe that it will indeed happen.
As a person from Asia living in the UK this has been a huge problem for me. The constant lumping in with these muzzies makes it very tough for a person to escape this form of racist protection of islam and muzzies by the media. The BBC and in fact all media outlets use the term asian. Chinese and Tai people are asians too. They are lumped in but thankfully due to appearance escape the full force of the racist misery that the BBC hands out to other asians who unfortunately look the same as the muzzies. In no way do I blame the native uk population from having a negative view of muslims who show time and time again their islamic criminality. If there was a way to beat this stereotyping trap I would gladly take it. I have thought of wearing a pig tee shirt! However, apart from possibly wearing the odd pig friendly tee shirt I am stuck. Thanx for nothing muslims!
arabconqueredpersian: I have great sympathy for your comments. The ‘lumping together’ you refer to, is I think down to utter cowardice on the part of the BBC and much of the MSM, in refusing to identify that it’s muslims and Islam which are causing so many problems in the Uk and across Europe.
No other religion on earth promotes such violence and hatred. I agree with Eeyore that the media should be sued for using the term ‘Asian’: the term is deliberately misleading and could put people who deplore Islam but happen to be ‘non-white’ at risk.
Chesters wrote: the term is deliberately misleading and could put people who deplore Islam but happen to be ‘non-white’ at risk.
In fact, much greater risk then Muslims, for a couple reasons
1. Muslims live in closed communities around a mosque, therefore they can defend themselves in numbers.
2. In the event of civil strife, the authorities will strain might and main to protect Muslim communities. The police and even the army will be sent to protect them.
This leaves non-Muslim Asian minorities, living at large, to bear the brunt of pent-up anger.
The BBC and the MSM in the UK, in the effort to disguise the real nature of the enemy, which is Islam, and therefore ideological, and lumping it as “Asian”, has turned an ideological issue to a racist one.
No matter what their intention was, good or bad, the BBC and the MSM is therefore guilty of racism on a grand scale. Guilty of racism not just to an individual but to a whole community or communities of non-Muslims or individuals.
arabconqueredpersian
We hear you.
I wrote: Muslims live in closed communities around a mosque, therefore they can defend themselves in numbers.
In retrospect, I believe that Muslims live in closed ghettoes for precisely this reason – to be able to protect themselves from outraged natives, as well as to mount effective razias (raids) on the surrounding dhimmi population. That is what Mohammed would do – in fact actually did.
Rape use to be a capital crime in all civilized nations, it was considered murder of the soul, now most of the so called civilized nations don’t have a death penalty and those that do don’t consider rape a capital crime.
You know the REAL crime here, the REAL tragedy ?
It is that our moral values, and those which we allow to be passed on to our kids have facilitated this, and I say this in no way to excuse the crimes of these evil scum. of the
I remember seeing an interview with one of the parents of the murdered Soham schoolgirls. the poor man was beside himself and shouted out in his anguish: How DARE this man sexualise my twelve year old daughter”.
Well I’m sorry, the man was in agony over his murdered daughter but I thought: HE (Huntley) didn’t sexualise your twelve year old daughter ,YOU sexualised your twelve year old daughter, YOU dressed her in a padded bra when she didn’t have any breasts, YOU dressed her in sexually provocative clothes, YOU allowed her to wear make up ( which is not a harmless bit of dressing up, but is designed to sexually stimylate men, that’s why women do it)
I say this, not to excuse or defend thse evil people, but to poimt out that our lack of morals and values leaves our children wide open to this type of crime, and
we are culpable in facilitating these crimes.
Muslims may be human beings, but they act like viruses.
And as for the “Asian” betrayal and predation of British girls?
The “Asians” scream racism day in and day out; their hypocrisy is really sickening.
These are hate crimes– expressions of racism.
No the father didn’t sexualize his daughter, peer pressure created by the liberal culture did this, as far as the Moslems being a virus, their religion and the Arabized culture they were born in is the virus, I am not sure what the cure is.
Hi I am in the UK. The term Asians in the UK is almost always used for Indians or Pakistani`s. One of my friends is a Sikh and he hates being called Asian because he knows most of the problems are caused by Pakistani`s. And as an ‘Asian’ he gets included in with that term.Yet the UK has no problems with the Sikh or Hindu communities. I think what has happened is people and the media have used the word Asian as it is a non specific.As the British are always afraid of offending, specific ethnicities and people. We have used a general term to avoid possible accusations of racism. That was in the past we now have the offence of ‘inciting racial hatred’.Which means if we are witnessed ‘offending’ those who are continually offended this is an arrestable offence.My first experience of this was over hearing a group of students and a police officer.A UK taxi driver (from a country next to India) had tried to over charge them.When they refused to pay he called the police and told them he had been racially abused.The police officer was taking statements for 20 minutes and then the driver decided not to proceed as he was not going to receive more money .The police officer happily accepted the word of one taxi driver against 5 university students passengers. Can you imagine if the driver had a witness? If you are alone you have no chance.I have heard of other cases where instead of a traditional argument the police are called and an accusation of “a racist comment” is made and a ‘witness’ is quickly persuaded to verify the story and the accused is arrested. A court will almost always back the offended/aggrieved party.You now have a police record because someone decided they were offended by you.
http://thelichfieldblog.co.uk/2010/09/17/man-arrested-after-racist-incident-in-chase-terrace/
http://www.northumbria.police.uk/news_and_events/news/newsindex/details.asp?id=25246
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-410150/Schoolgirl-arrested-refusing-study-non-English-pupils.html
http://www.metro.co.uk/home/21147-schoolgirl-arrested-for-racism
http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/Castleford-Racial-abuser-of-store.6613896.jp
http://www.clickliverpool.com/news/national-news/127703-racism-charges-for-saying-yank-thrown-out-of-court.html
I don’t give a shit what they’re called or by whom. Let’s cut to the chase: anyone who rapes young girls and sells them to slavery is an animal. Enough bullshit. It’s not padded bras, ‘sexually provocative clothes’ or make up that is at fault. Our moral values are sound; they still bring pigs like this to the court room and grants them a fair trial. Our true liberal culture enables men and women to be free to live lives based upon their own accord, free from ignorant supersticion and obsolete, prophetic mumbo jumbo.
Maybe it’s time we spent more time defending our great culture instead of finding petty fault with it. Minor faults all things considered, but no less ones that morally inadequate and socially retarded enemies gladfully latch onto to embolden their own weakended selves in order to gain an increasing upper hand.
Grace
Agree with you totally. Once we accept that the life style or clothing that women wear, is what incites Mohamedans, then it is a slippery slope towards the government/law stipulating what dress one can wear in public.
Britain is already far too far down the Big Brother route. The govmint already pressures us what we can eat, how much fat, drink, salt etc, on pain that at some future date, NHS doctors will refuse us treatment – in other words a gun to head. Within no time our remaining freedoms that havnt already been curtailed by the EU, will vanish.
The real reason why we have the need for biometric passports, intrusive security when we travel, bombs in airplanes, long delays, security in shopping malls, CCTV everywhere, is because of the huge number of Muslims in Britain. This is our future for ever, and very likely worse, unless we accept that living in close proximity with Muslims was a mistake, and for the benefit of all, it will be best for a separation from Muslims. Or else look forward to a civil war that will make Bosnia look like a garden party.
I wish we had a Tea Party. Dammit, we were the main reason why the original Tea party took place. No reason why we cant have one. The BBC will have kittens.
Grace I agree, and one of the ways to do that is to insist that all immigrants assimilate into the base culture of the host nation, make all nations melting pots, rather then salad bowels of multiculturalism. The idea of multiculturalism was created to try and destroy the west so the USSR could take over and create a “socialist paradise” covering the entire world. The USSR no longer exists but the socialist refuse to admit that their “socialist paradise” can not exist, socialism/Marxism/communism has never worked, it has failed every time anyone tried to create one. And it has been tried many times since Plato first thought up the idea, the reason for its failure is that it works against human nature, and socialist are so arrogant that they think they will be able to do what no one else has. This arrogance is fine if you are working with the physical sciences where new knowledge lets you succeed where others failed, but in the social sciences you have to recognize that human nature has not changed and can not change as long as we are still human, thus socialism doesn’t work. Huxley in “Brave New World” showed a world where genetic manipulation had created a society where the socialist dream worked, but it was done by destroying most of humanity by making them literally less then human.
The term “Asian”, as a euphemism for Muslim, used to confuse the heck out of me. I’d hear about Asian gangs burning things down and I’d have this mental picture of angry Chinese guys with math books under their arms. It just didn’t add up. You see, I happen to know where Asia is. The French do the same thing with the word “youth”. Are we talking envelopes stuffed with Saudi cash here? What could be motivating such foolishness? Who says that it’s illegal to call Muslims, Muslims? C’mon. That’s just ridiculous.
Keeping them alive is too easy.
Hanging them in front of their Muzzie neighbourhoods would probably send a better message…
No objection from me, you can do it hillbilly style if you want and I won’t object. Hillbilly style is to castrate them just before the hanging and then sew the testicles in their mouth.