Nick Pisa in Rome The Telegraph UK
Published: 7:06PM BST 30 Mar 2010
The Northern League, an anti immigration party, which has now become pivotal in Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s ruling coalition, has seen it’s support more than double in the last five years.
Led by firebrand Umberto Bossi, who once called for the Italian navy to shell boats carrying illegal immigrants towards the country, his victory mirrors those recently by far right parties in Hungary, Holland and France.
In the last regional elections held in 2005 the League secured just 5.7 per cent of the vote but in subsequent polls they have seen their popularity grow and this time it was 12.7 per cent.
James Walston, a political commentator at the American University of Rome, said: “The League has done very well and they will be flexing their muscles for the remaining three years of government.
“They will push for further devolution and immigration and race will also be on top of their agenda and these two are issues which are of concern to many Italians.
“The League is very well organised and they have succeeded in taking a lot of the working class vote from the Communists and Democratic Left and they also appear to have taken votes from Berlusconi’s own party.”
The result comes just ten days after the National Front won nearly 10 per cent of the overall vote in the regional elections, capturing 118 seats in 12 regions.
Jean-Marie Le Pen, the party’s 81-year old leader, said: “It’s the phoenix rising from the ashes. The National Front has returned to the forefront of French politics.”
In Holland, the far-Right politician, Geert Wilders, is poised to become the next Dutch prime minister after he made significant gains in the regional elections at the beginning of this month. If the pattern is repeated in the national elections on June 9, his Freedom Party could win 27 out of 150 seats, becoming the largest single party.
In Hungary, according to opinion polls, the far-Right Jobbik party is poised to become the second biggest party in parliament in next month’s elections.
After the election results yesterday, the Corriere Della Sera asked readers on its website why the League had done so well and one wrote: “Because it is the only concrete and viable party currently in Italian politics. It has concrete objectives and good internal party discipline.”
The League is now a key figure in Berlusconi’s coalition and as a result its members have been given key cabinet posts including Roberto Maroni as Interior Minister.
Mr Bossi described the League’s performance as a ‘tsunami’ but assured his government partners in Rome that the balance of power in the coalition would not change and said the result of the regional vote could only give momentum to federalist reforms.
The League’s advance appeared to be at the expense of Berlusconi’s People of Freedom (PDL) party which saw its share of the vote fall to 26.7 per cent from 35.3 per cent in the European elections, 37.4 per cent in the general elections and 29.3 per cent in the 2005 regional vote.
The League has campaigned against the building of mosques and are also pressing for legislation on the wearing of burkas.
Such developments, as we’ve seen through support for Geert Wilders’s PVV and the Swiss ban on minarets, are the realization that only parties that openly discuss the menace of opensewerization/islamization of the West are prepared to tackle this problem head on. This has got nothing to do with racism or xenophobia, and anyone who understands the threat to democracy, secular laws and human rights posed by mahoundianism, and truly cares about the preservation of that in the West, will sooner or later arrive at the same conclusion: such parties are the only alternative to complete surrender to mahound, period.
You know, it would be nice, just once, to see the name ‘Geert Wilders’, without the term ‘far-right’ in front of it. You’d think it was his first name. When he was little, and it was time for dinner, did his mom stand on the porch and shout, “Far-right! Far-right!” Does every journalist in the world get a little slip of paper under their door in the morning telling them exactly what to say and think? Do they test them when they’re young and weed out the ones with any sign of intelligence or integrity? Does the quality of courage get you a lifetime ban from the International League of Journalists?
Everytime I hear someone refer to Wilders as ‘far right’ I ask them to name one historical personage who was far-right, and defended the rights of jews, minorities, individual freedoms, homosexual rights. When they can’t I remind them that Wilders clearly cannot be ‘right wing’ as they think about it. So far, 100% success.
Truth is funny that way.
Eeyore, he can’t be far left either.
As we all know, the far left (National Socialists) killed Jews in their millions. Not to mention homosexuals, Gypsies and the mentally disturbed. They also took away freedoms and human rights.
Wilders takes the opposite approach, so the opposite of far left must be far right.