I have recently come across a rather startling document listing a number of people who write under pseudonyms for the anti-jihad. This document, in fact, documents these people’s real names and approximate places of residence. It asks that certain governments disallow these individuals from being allowed entry to certain countries and it does so partially because these people make the claim that Europe is becoming so anti-freedom-of-speech that it is a cause for alarm.
To be clear, a public document has been created naming people, thereby putting their lives in danger, for the purpose of asking that they be forbidden from entering certain EU countries, as they make the claim that the EU is anti-freedom-of-speech and therefore a threat to Europe.
While I’m certain that the irony of this will be lost on the author of the published document to which I refer, this is not the point I wish to make. (I will not link to that document here as I do not wish to add to the damage the author has already done, nor do I wish to aid him in his cause.)
History is full of people who are considered larger-than-life for their ability to recognize a threat to freedom, liberty, and what is in the best interest of a given people, and to mobilize a defense against it. Winston Churchill comes to mind. He is by no means unique but is one of a dozen men which all nations and peoples have.
The refusal of the elite class to protect Western nations from Islamic terrorism is the biggest betrayal in history. It is rooted in the mindset that breeds the claim that “force is not an answer” to terrorism, that profiling is bad and open borders are good, that Islam is peaceful and the West is wicked. The upholders of such claims belong to the culture that has lost its bond with nature, history, and the supporting community. In the meantime, thanks to them, the quiet onslaught continues unabated, across the Straits of Gibraltar, through JFK and O’Hare, Heathrow and Schiphol. Far from enhancing diversity, it threatens to impose a numbing sameness and eradicate the identity of target-populations, to demolish their special character and uniqueness.
The above is the message that those people ‘outed’ in this document attempt to disseminate. It is also the message of us here at Vladtepesblog. We, the anti-jihad, in nearly all cases, in fact, seek to preserve classical liberalism. We are the real liberals. We believe in genuine diversity. This means fighting against Islam, which seeks to make a mono-culture. We believe in individualism over the State. This is why so many work so hard to endanger us. It was absolutely clear to the person who wrote the document of I write, that by giving the real names of well-known bloggers they were exposing them to potential danger at the hands of Muslims, as we have seen so many critics of Islam be murdered for it, or be forced to live their lives in near-prisons in order to avoid being murdered. The left stands for the State above the individual and sees Islam as its natural ally, using the language of guilt and political correctness, rather than facts and reason, which are anathema to the left today.
History ultimately will judge who are today’s geniuses and who are the small-minded, bigoted, or crazy. Silencing anyone and forbidding debate is the province of tyrants. This is an historical constant.
Eeyore for Vladtepesblog