1. “There will be no Iranian Regime”
2. Evidence released that Obama in fact did conspire to overthrow the US government
3. Stephen Coughlin has said in various ways and times, “We are in a state of political warfare, and political warfare ALWAYS becomes kinetic.”
4. Obama’s ICE program and how CNN supported it
https://twitter.com/WallStreetMav/status/2011264995884220795?s=20
The last Torah interpretation of ”t’shuva”, requires a follow up Talmudic study-examination that addresses the same subject. Important basis of understanding: A fundamental distinction which separates the Book of ?????? from the ?????? Books of ????, ?????, ?????? — pre-revelation of the Torah at Sinai, the Gods in the Heavens; post-revelation of the Torah at Sinai-?? ??? lives only within the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the hearts of the Chosen Cohen people for eternity thereafter.
Hence when the corrupt false Messiah JeZeus taught his ‘disciples’ how to pray, this Harry Potter fictional messiah did not know the basic distinction between how the Avot called upon ??, ???, ??, ?????, ?? ???, ?? ??? ?????? – all these Divine Names of the bnai brit soul, they thrive in the Heavens above, or ???? ???; for example Avram cut the brit between the pieces with ?? ??? touching the future born birth of all his children, but most specifically his chosen first born Cohen children – all of whom lived only in the world to come in Heaven.
Post Sinai: the ?? ??? – (????? ?) — ?? ????? ???, instructs a radically Sinai “shock” distinction. Post Sinai the local tribal god of the chosen Cohen people rules only within the borders of the promised land – the eternal inheritance of the chosen Cohen people alone; the jurisdiction of the Great Sanhedrin – likewise limited and restricted to within the borders of the 12 Tribe Cohen Republic; and despite the farcical false prophet Muhammad which taught that prophets sent to all peoples and nations, and these prophets speak in the native tongues of ‘all peoples and nations’, this fraud denies the simple Talmudic understanding that only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the Revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The proof for the Talmud’s instruction: Goyim pray to their Universal Gods who live in the Heavens.
The fictional Harry Potter false messiah of the noise NT fraud taught his “disciples”: Matthew 6:9-13 – Our Farter in Heaven; the NT: a Protocols of the Elders of Zion – Roman fraud counterfeit because of its complete and total ignorance of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai which makes an eternal ????? distinction between how pre-Sinai Avot prophets called upon their local tribal god in heaven; from how the post Sinai – the chosen Cohen eternal seed of the Avot – call upon the exact same but different local tribal god, who dwells only in the Earth. This fundamental ???? ????? distinction, the stinky Noise NT Roman authors did not know that pre-Sinai our local god lived in the Heavens whereas post Sinai our local god lives only within the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the heart; according to how rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi explains the k’vanna of ???? ??? ????? ????????.
The primary Talmudic locus for t’shuva is Masechet Yoma, which dissects Yom Kippur’s atonement mechanics but roots them in the post-Sinai heart. T’shuva “remembers”: A) the sworn oaths wherein the Avot cut a oath alliance brit touching the future born birth of the Chosen Cohen children of the Avot. Each Av swore a unique oath to cut the identical oath alliance brit which ???? ???? ?????? creates the Chosen Cohen People ?? ???? ?? ??? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ?????. Toldot positive and negative Torah commandments and Talmudic halachot do not require k’vanna. However employing these secondary commandments and halachot as ????? ???? precedents to other Torah commandments, this action raises/elevates these secondary commandments to primary time-oriented commandments. Based upon the precedent distinction which separates the Divine Names wherein the Avot of the Book of ?????? prayed to their local god in the heavens to the ?? ??? Sinai revelation wherein the local god of the Chosen Cohen seed of the Avot lives within the Yatzir-Tov of the heart. B) HaShem on Yom Kippur annulled His vow to profane the Torah oath alliance cut with the Avot, and establish Moshe Rabbeinu as the Father of the chosen Cohen people. Herein the Torah differentiates between oaths which neither HaShem nor Man can cancel; opposed by Vow which both Man & HaShem can annul.
T’shuva’s primary Talmudic locus in Masechet Yoma (especially 86a-b), where Resh Lakish’s teachings—”Great is t’shuva, for intentional sins become unintentional” (via fear) and “intentional sins become merits” (via love/ahavah)—embody post-Sinai heart-work. T’shuva “remembers” in two layers. The sworn oaths cut by the Avot – as contained withing the opening p’suk of ???? ??? tefillah as contrasted by Tehillem prayers, this chochmah of ??? ???? ????? distinct and apart from toldot prayers, commandments and halachot.
Tefillah – opens with ??? wherein ????? separates HaShem from HaShem; wherein Israel accepts the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven-the Written and Oral Torah revelations at Sinai & Horev. Tehillem prayers do not require k’vanna because they do not qualify as time-oriented commandments as does tefillat kre’a shma. Translating the ??? ????? ?? ??? to other words, regardless ??, ???, ??, ?????, ?? ???, ??? ??????, JeZeus, or Allah etc, precisely duplicates the Av tumah avoda zarah of the Sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ??? ?? ???? ??? ???? ????? translated Elohim for the ??? ????? ?? ??? ????.
Yom Kippur, framing teshuva as an internal, post-Sinai act that “remembers” the Avot’s oaths—sworn alliances creating the Cohen people yesh me’ayin (from nothing) through chochma of zman grama mitzvot, which demand kavana to align the heart’s yetzer ha-tov with the Sinai revelation. Resh Lakish teaches: “Great is teshuva, for it causes intentional sins to be reckoned as unintentional” (when motivated by fear/yirah), and “intentional sins to be reckoned as merits” (when from love/ahava)—embodying the heart’s return that heals backsliding (Hosea 14:5). This duality reflects post-Sinai immanence: teshuva from love fully integrates sins into the yetzer ha-tov’s divine spark, unlike pre-Sinai external britot (e.g., Avram’s with El Shaddai, touching future heavenly seed). Contradictions in verses (e.g., “Return, backsliding children, I will heal” vs. “I will heal their backsliding”) resolve as love (erasing sin as if never occurred) versus fear (healing but remembering sin), or even teshuva compelled by suffering.
Yoma 86b’s baraita categorizes atonement introduces other interpretations of t’shuva based upon the kabbalah of ?????? ??:??, ??:? ??? ????? ??:?. Based upon the floods of Noach profaning a Torah oath threatens the existence of the entire World. Discernment defines judgment. The dedication of a barbeque unto Heaven – the rejected offering made by Cain – the rejected first born Cohen son. Korbanot, like tefillah require ?? ?????? – an oath sworn dedication of Oral Torah middot ????. Ideally the tefillah oath sworn while standing before a Sefer Torah; whereas the korban the ?? ?????? Torah oath sworn while standing before the altar. Obviously if a person lacks the ???? which discerns between the k’vanna distinctions that separates ?’ from ?’ from ?? from ???? from ???? etc, such an ?? ???? lacks k’vanna just as a person who observes Shabbat but fails to discern – not doing acts of ????? on the day of Shabbat dedicates doing these ???? ?????? throughout the 6 days of Shabbat. Doing mitzvot as ????? defines the k’vanna of time-oriented commandments which create ?????? in the Heavens. The creation of ?????? through tohor time-oriented Av commandments defines the intent of ??? ?????.
Rabbi Eliezer calls upon a Bat Kol from heaven. This Mishna of ???? addresses the most complex and difficult subject in the whole of the Sha’s Bavli – tohor vs tumah. Rabbi Meir perhaps the most profound authority on this exceptionally difficult subject; ; ?? ?”? – ??? – removes av tuma avoda zara spirits from the Yatzir Ha-Raw, similar to ??? on Pesach. Rabban Gamliel showed a tuma lack of respect to both rabbi Meir – capable of adducing 48 proofs for purity or impurity on any matter, Eruvin 13b – by expunging his Name from the Mishna and Rabbi Yehoshua – which broke the camel’s back and caused the Nassi’s own public humiliation of being replaced as Sanhedrin head. Rabbi Yehoshua understood ???? as a Torah ???? ?????.
The dispute between Rashi & Rabbeinu Tam appearance of 3 stars vs. ??? ????? defines the distinction which separates how Rabban Gamliel vs. rabbi Yehoshua interpreted the k’vanna of ????. Tefillah ???????? – Kre’a Shma. This tefillah ideally a person sits while wearing tefillen. Tefillen like a Sefer Torah in matters of swearing oaths. Rabbi Yehoshua understood ????? ????? as a ???? mitzva. Meaning the k’vanna of saying ???? ??? ????? ???? ?? ??? ????? – its still day, therefore a person has ???? to place tefillen and affix the Kre’a Shma ????? to the ???? Shemone Esrei, and the ????? ????? to the ???? ??? ?????, said prior to sleeping; at that time for sure 3 stars have appeared in the Heavens.
This ties into t’shuva because ????? learns from ger tzeddik. Where the ger tzeddik qualifies as a tohor new creation’ so too the person placed into the curse of ????? too qualifies as a “tuma new creation”. For example, if a ??? refuses to give his ex-wife her Get, a Torah court could place the curse of ????? upon that arrogant man, who publicly profanes his ??????? made before kosher witnesses and a minyan of 10 men, and issue a Get to the enchained ex-wife. Gittin 88b: Courts may compel a get, even with rods if needed. ?”? died in cherem, so this Torah curse not limited to 30 days, shamata, like a standard nazir vow.
The Sages burned his tahor declarations and excommunicated him for not yielding; he remained isolated, with his death marked by final words of “tahor” (Sanhedrin 68a; various aggadic accounts). Post-death, Rabbi Yehoshua revoked the ban, affirming his ultimate purity (tearing garments in mourning). This shows nidui can function as a lifelong “curse” for profound communal threats, yet teshuva (or posthumous recognition) restores. The court may authorize agents to issue the get if he persists (Yevamot 90a; Ketubot 77a).
Earthly courts wield nidui as a tool of coercion and transformation, annulling vows/oaths of profanation within Israel’s borders—rejecting heavenly appeals (as in Rabbi Eliezer’s bat kol) while restoring the yetzer ha-tov’s divine spark. Rabbi Eliezer’s enduring nidui until death highlights the gravity of refusing communal authority, yet his story ends in purity, affirming teshuva’s ultimate triumph.
tldr
Clean up in aisle six?
I think a probable analysis is needed here.
One way to destroy a website that has counter narrative and classical values and views, is to permeate it with terms and ideas that cause division, and flag it to search engines as being a conspiracy or hate mongering site.
As usual, with the left the point is never the point. The revolution, or more generally the telos of the action is always the point.
The incoherent ramblings of the poster who calls himself “mosckerr ” is littered with terms like “goyim” and other phrases that likely carry a dual purpose, neither of which is to impart meaning or information,.
One is to foment hatred between Christians and Jews. The other to foul up the material search engines find on this site.
Many websites in fact get taken down from content in the comments. Sort of the information-warfare equivalent of planting drugs in the trunk of a person’s car the police want to arrest for some other reason.
We would love to be a laissez-faire website as we are very close to free speech absolutists. But we would be of no use to anyone for anything if our visibility gets pushed even below the tiny threshold it already is held at by AI (Chat once called this a far right wing conspiracy site) and search engines, or if the principles of this site are held accountable for comments left as bait.
Just to be 100% clear on this point, when we refer to ‘leftism,’ we don’t mean party politics but an epistemic posture: the use of language and dialectics to reshape reality toward a predetermined end, rather than to discover truth.
I don’t need mouthy Is-real-is to make me more nervous.
All the hospitals are on alert.
Here I can barely breathe.
Gen. Avivi is actually one of my favorites. Maybe typical Israeli, though: PTrump is a can-do-no-wrong idol.
~~~~~~~
Oops! Witless Witkoff!
?A Bad Sign for Iran’s Revolution
Witkoff is Negotiating with Iran’s Mullahcracy
Steve Witkoff, President Trump’s fixer, has entered the Iran mess and is now talking to Iran’s leaders. This is a very bad sign for the Iranian revolution, because Witkoff’s approach is to fix “problems.”
The Iranian revolution is not a problem: it is an unprecedented opportunity. By deflecting any US response to the ongoing crisis, whether intentionally or not, Witkoff could hand the Mullah’s a victory against the people of Iran.
https://weapons.substack.com/p/a-bad-sign-for-irans-revolution
J.E. Dyer feels the same about Wittkoff and Kushner as most of us do. But she suggests we take a deep breath and dial our rage down to annoyance:
Ping Two: The Rhetoric and the Reality
This observation is important.
It has to do with the public discussions by Trump officials of U.S. policy on Gaza and the Middle East, which regularly disappoint and frustrate knowledgeable and well-meaning observers.
Knowing the treachery nations like Turkey and Qatar have frequently engaged in, and their bad records on problems like Syria, the Kurds, Palestinian Arab terrorism, and basic human rights, it’s understandable that the sometimes (OK, often) fatuous-sounding rhetoric is like nails on a chalkboard.
It’s not just the rhetoric, of course. It’s the policy direction indicated by speeches, affirmations, and proposals, when taken at face value as each instance pops up.
Too often it seems – there’s no other word for it – stupid. We’re surely not thinking of allowing a military or even any other on-the-ground presence in Gaza of forces that answer to Recep Tayyip Edogan, right?
In fact, why are we contemplating such foolishness as a multinational peacekeeping force in Gaza that sounds exactly like the counterproductive UNIFIL in southern Lebanon? And is it really necessary to slather Qatar in so much butter that there’s no ungreased spot to latch onto, if Doha wants to get slippery on us?
These are legitimate questions. I offer a couple of thoughts to help deal with them, however.
The first has so far been comprehensively true, though it’s still unnatural to keep it in mind. It’s simply this: none of the weirdly convivial acclamations being launched by American envoys at our sour-faced regional partners with poor records for reliability and common interests has actually produced the evil outcomes predicted for them…
Vigilance is in order, as always, but the fears just aren’t bearing dark, rancid fruit. Explaining that is too much to try to do in this treatment, but the pattern hasn’t worsened. It’s uncomfortable, because we’re used to carefully stringent-sounding, conventional wording being sent off across a high-wire, instead of the stream of extravagant nonsense our envoys keep producing. The old standard of rhetoric had the advantage of being comforting and familiar.…
I can’t account for the unnecessary slurping that accompanies press announcements of Middle East policy updates by Trump’s team (though I have my suspicions about some of it. One thing to keep in mind is that keeping the front door open for max participation by the various parties helps discourage the sneaky backdoor problem). But it hasn’t had the concrete effects outlined in pessimistic predictions.…
https://theoptimisticconservative.wordpress.com/2025/10/27/toc-ready-room-27-october-2025-two-pings-aircraft-carrier-to-counterdrug-fight-off-venezuela-geopol-rhetoric-versus-actual-results/
Why a Free Iran Would Transform Global Politics
It really is worse than most of us can imagine. Nothing that’s available on open platforms. It’s just that bad.
Keep checking J.E. Dyer’s updates. Her practical perspective is just right.
https://theoptimisticconservative.wordpress.com/2026/01/05/happy-new-year-2026/#more-10796
J.E. Dyer’s article from Oct. 2025 puts Trump’s Venezuela, Mideast, Russia, and China ops together.
Two pings (Aircraft carrier to counterdrug fight off Venezuela; Geopol rhetoric versus actual results)
What’s wrong and right with the world of national security and power rhetoric.
https://theoptimisticconservative.wordpress.com/2025/10/27/toc-ready-room-27-october-2025-two-pings-aircraft-carrier-to-counterdrug-fight-off-venezuela-geopol-rhetoric-versus-actual-results/
IRAN – Knowing the USA has infiltrator agents on the ground in Iran, all Trump has to do is to bomb their munitions manufacturing and storage facilities. No bullets, no deaths. See how fast they abandon ship.