Muslims waging random jihad in Canada, One Florida sheriff switches back to a reality based OS, and how the left deracinates private property, even conceptually: Links 1 for Aug. 29, 2025

1. Governments since at LEAST Stephen Harper’s immigration minister, Jason Kenney brought these people here to do this.

https://twitter.com/KirkLubimov/status/1961212664245551366

2. A Florida Sheriff on the intended response to planned calculated violent protests in his state.

May the Western World remember this kind of reasonableness

3. The communist’s destruction of our conceptual universe takes place by carefully crafted narratives and deceptions. The total obliteration of private property rights in the West uses different tactics in different locales. As the 2010 Rockefeller report says in its Operation Lockstep, adjust the language and tactics to the local culture. (More or less quoting from memory)

In Canada its a very multi-tiered and layered approach to destruction of property rights, largely but not entirely relying on incrementalism.

It recently came to my attention, that an older couple discovered they had bats in their home in Ontario. They then discovered that it was illegal, and a fairly serious crime to remove these bats as they may, not were, but may belong to an endangered species of bat. That removing them would carry serious consequences and no company will do it until after the deadline of sometime late August as they would be breeding in your walls at that time.

It also came to their attention, that these bats can transmit rabies to them by biting them in their sleep, or drooling on them from the air above them. The couple had to undergo a series of rabies injections as a precautionary measure. I think in one case, more than one series was recommended.

If you have in fact discovered that you have bats in the walls, there are two conditions that allow you to have them removed against the various laws forcing you to keep them. Medical, that you have some condition that makes you vulnerable to the shots bats, or a religious exemption age, where your age makes you vulnerable to issues with the bats.

The couple checked the boxes for both, and were denied the exemptions.

Sound familiar at all?

The state builds a rat trap and entices you in by showing you an exit at the back. But when you try it, it opens to a tunnel that goes right back into the trap.

They did the precise same con with the Vaxx. Everyone has to take it unless you have a religious (everyone imagined they could have one of those as it’s a claim of personal belief) or medical reason not to take it. But in reality, people who had severe anaphylaxis to the first shot were made to take a second once their levels of antihistamines were high enough. And although a very small number of people did get religious exemptions, in most cases a state apparatchik would determine what your religion said and what your beliefs really are and make you take the shot or lose your job.

Several Canadian provinces have now passed laws with stunningly high fines for walking in the woods, or even on the beach. Always accompanied by a safety or collectivist reason of course. People often we are told, go to the beach in Nova Scotia after a hurricane to watch the drama of the ocean waves. This year for the first time, the beach was closed to them.

The state’s job should be to inform, not to mandate. But it mandates, and disinforms.

The former example is the negation of private property rights. It’s your house, unless bats move in. The state would not even send someone out to confirm it was the endangered variety.

It’s your body your choice if you want to terminate a pregnancy/kill your baby. But not if you wish to refuse a state mandated experimental gene therapy.

Private property extends to your personal physical self.

Canadian bill C-4 removed the right of parents to even contradict a state narrative on your children who may have been talked into becoming sterilized and mutilated in the name of public health endangered bats “trans affirming care”.

If a parent tells a young child to wait before becoming mutilated surgically, or engage on a course of powerful medications, the results of which cause permanent changes, such as testosterone in women, they are guilty of violating the “conversion therapy” law.

One of the things that make this interesting is that a lot of gay groups consider the law to be itself, extreme conversion therapy. They argue that a child that may just be gay, is being forced to surgically become the other sex, and therefore, become straight. The definition of conversion therapy but in extremis.

For clarity, this woman is not wearing a mask for virtue or Covid reasons. She is wearing it because she is afraid for her safety from what we can all see clearly now, is the violent and even murderous methodology of the Trans-Queer-communist revolutionary movement, using again, the bogus concept of rights to justify controlling what we say and think.

Now on to the property items:

4. One of the left’s most common rhetorical tricks is the use of false level of abstraction. Nowhere is this more evident than in the issue of banning the public from owning guns, treacherously named, “Gun control”. Of course no where intends to ban guns. The elite, politicians and so on will always be able to get all they want, and be surrounded in large numbers of guards with whatever weapons they feel are best. What “gun control” really means, is a citizenry that has zero method of protecting themselves from a tyrannical state. The state apparatus in fact, will be increasingly armed. We have even seen in the past 20 years, a sort of merger of police forces with the military in terms of tactics, equipment and so on. Militarized police are becoming a common site now. So Gun Control needs to be understood for what it is. YOU control.

I stumbled on something which likely will be used in that fake level of abstraction to assist in this.

https://twitter.com/DemosKratosCA/status/1961154624133411023?t=eLjTSwJO_fKlL-iPcUx4Lg&s=19

I have to say, when I saw this man’s analysis in the tweet, I felt a wave of pleasure that he actually gets it, as opposed to taking the allowable counter-narrative position.

Thank you Pascal.

And yes, this goes to property rights as well. What you can, and cannot own.

In the UK this has been extended to knife control. Except of course for anyone from a group likely to use them in a terrorist attack. Then, no problem.

5. A brilliant example of CTV’s pure narrative reporting.

A conspicuously Jewish woman was stabbed in the KOSHER section of a major Ottawa Grocery store. She was looked after by many employees there till the ambulance arrived. So there are witnesses to the event presumably.

Watch CTV’s stunning disinformation on this event. Even the other media does other forms of disinformation, some calling it a Kosher store when in fact, it is a major grocer that has a tiny (from what I am told) kosher section. I hope to have more on that today actually.

Why the lie?

Because they are trying to hide the jewish factor of the victim. CTV literally lies about the section, calling it “produce” while other media calls it a Kosher store, indicating that the whole Loblaws is Kosher so the people shopping there could be anyone.

Understanding the clear and consistent rhetorical weapons of the media is critical if you want to have any way of knowing what is real from what is said. Over time, most people have figured out various secret decoder ring methods. Like if they don’t describe the perp, he was Islamic or black. If they don’t name the perp, for sure Islamic etc. But the media adapts and once we have that worked out they change to another form of deception, more difficult to penetrate.

But knowing they are trying to hide the facts is the main part. Once you know that, you actually know enough.

There is a lot more to discuss of course. The city of Ottawa has now allowed the aerial spraying of Glyphosates in the wooded areas around the city. One could easily make a case that this infringes on private property rights.

If you buy a piece of land anywhere, say out in the country; you don’t, it turns out, have the mineral rights to that land. It also turns out that you may not even have the rights to the wood and trees that grow on it if you bought a wooded lot. And now we learn that you have no right to stop the state from spraying a carcinogenic desiccant on all your property which can only have the effect of preparing it to burn down, as the round-up will kill all the smaller underbrush and create a ton of deadfall.

This is being done over the forests of Nova Scotia as well. So… maybe kinda explains the 28,000.00$ fines for walking in the woods. They don’t want you seeing that maybe. Or suing anyone for what will happen to you with a lung full of round up.

With the left, the point is never the point. The Revolution is always the point.

This is NOT just a clever slogan. This is central to the matter

‘The proles are not human beings,’ he said carelessly. ‘By 2050–earlier,
probably–all real knowledge of Oldspeak will have disappeared. The whole
literature of the past will have been destroyed. Chaucer, Shakespeare,
Milton, Byron–they’ll exist only in Newspeak versions, not merely changed
into something different, but actually changed into something contradictory
of what they used to be. Even the literature of the Party will change.
Even the slogans will change. How could you have a slogan like “freedom is
slavery” when the concept of freedom has been abolished? The whole climate
of thought will be different. In fact there will be no thought, as we
understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking–not needing to think.
Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.

“The word free still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be used in such statements as ‘This dog is free from lice’

or ‘This field is free from weeds’. It could not be used in its old sense of ‘politically free’ or ‘intellectually free’ since political and intellectual freedom

no longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless.”

George Orwell: 1984 and The Principles of Newspeak.