1. Discussion by LOTUSEATERS on the Islamophobia council in the UK. For those who do not know, the UK is on the cusp of making criticism of Islam officially a criminal offence.
The Tweet also contains some analysis which is pretty good. Click through of you like to read it.
The video itself we consider to be controlled opposition in the sense that it is just colour commentary, much like at a sporting event, where some shmoe is describing the same game play everyone can see right in front of their faces.
The fact remains that Islamophobia laws, like “hate speech” laws are the Marxist approach to speech and thought control. They are the intersectional line of attack against freedom of speech. They are to allow the state to imprison anyone who openly advocates against state narratives, which means more importantly, counter-revolutionary views. In the video above, they incredulously list some of the now illegal views, such as not being in support of a free Palestine or Cashmere is now islamophobic. We here have to try and differentiate between rage bait and controlled op, and meaningful understanding of the communist take-over of Western nations.
2. So Trump threatened heavy tariffs on Canada due to Canada allowing China to turn Canada into a weapon against the United States. This is especially evident in the mass civilian deaths in the US from Chinese made, sponsored or otherwise originated Fentanyl weapon. Canada pretended that not a large volume of Fentanyl came from Canada, but some of the articles below show how a small amount can kill a large number of people. In fact, the brother of the Islamic jihadi who waged jihad on some Canadians including a father and daughter having ice cream on Danforth Avenue in Toronto a few years ago, was discovered to have enough carfentanil, an even more concentrated form of the synthetic opiate, to kill everyone in North America. Still no word on where he got the money for it all, and what the plans for it were. Which is probably part of the reason Alberta’s Premiere, Danielle Smith elected not to use the RCMP for her new border guard she created to protect the border for both sides.
Here are a few items that help give scale and perspective to the issue:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DFlmH0JuSR3/?igsh=QkFENnN2bzRxaQ%3D%3D
This is an excellent presentation by Sen. Ted Cruz.
I think we’ve posted this before, but it speaks directly to Canada having been so compromised by China, that the US would not be out of place to consider Canada the enemy in the event of war with China.
It appears one of the big 5 charter banks in Canada is heavily involved in funding the Fentanyl trade in the USA
After Trudeau called the White House and made claims about how he would reinforce the border and stop the opiate-weapon from getting in, Trump gave Canada a 30 day reprieve from the tariffs. The US Canadian dollar returned from its all time low of $1.00 getting $1.37 Canadian to its more normal for the past few months, 1:00 -> $1.33 or so. Trudeau is a liar and a determined communist revolutionary. He also thinks he is a lot smarter than he is. So chances are he thinks he pulled a fast one on Trump and in actuality will do nothing or make matters worse. If I were a betting man, the temptation would be to bet the Canadian dollar will fall to an all time low sometime in mid March. Maybe even USD $1.00 gets you two Canadian. We will be the Snow Peso. This will happen the moment Trump feels he has been played. Mexico is doing it all for real. In this author’s opinion, it is because the Mexicans want these policies and a return to sanity, and are thrilled that the Trump admin has shown it is serious about restoring the international order and security. Including stopping the insane fast and furious program where the Obama/Biden admin was arming Mexican drug cartels.
Canada is another kettle of fish though. We are not looking to restore sanity. We are moving towards the German/British model of total Orwellian communism.
The following Tweet is from Canadian opposition leader, Pierre Poilievre.
Let me make a comment of my own.
Should anyone wish to, the book on Chinese unrestricted warfare is out there for anyone to read. It basically examines warfare from every and any possible method. Take Sun Tzu and add modern technology and a hundred other vectors of covert attack and you kinda have it. Understanding this, looking at the Fentanyl issue, we can and should see it as a military operation. After all, if the neighbourhood down the street from you was pushing lethal drugs to the young adults in your area with industrial zeal and the death rate was very high, you would be foolish not to respond by attacking those responsible in a military way. The law was never meant to handle this scale of attack. And we must know it is an attack. Therefore, Pierre’s Tweet is more than rational. If anything, it is far too kind.
Trudeau actually legalized Fentanyl. For Children. So… who is compromised by China in the Federal Government?
Over 4000 individual organized crime groups involved with production and distribution of Fentanyl in Canada. Fun to watch the RCMP obfuscate about it.
Oh for crying out loud.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
LEGALIZE IT ALL!
The poison garbage trafficked as a weapon is worlds away from the Fentanyl prescribed and distributed by responsible medical professionals. The lethality differential should give you a clue. This is a political passion play.
It’s really simple, Yucki.
1. Decriminalize and regulate.
2. Dirty drug supply from China dries up, as people can buy regulated and clean stuff domestically.
3. People stop dying of overdose as dosage is clearly marked and there are no hidden admixtures.
This does not fix all the problems of drug use and abuse, but it sure does fix these two, practically overnight.
Actually it’s simpler than that. Hang drug dealers from the lamp posts in the public square. Drier than a California wind.
This is the only guaranteed solution, works like a charm every time it is tried.
No it doesn’t. See below.
And the costs to civil liberties are astronomical.
Geez guys, read the history. How many times does Prohibition have to be tried to reap the consequences?!
Look at what has happened in every place where drugs are legalized, the people start with the legal controlled drugs and then move over to the stronger uncontrolled drugs.
Legalize it all. Let the people decide.
China ended their drug problem by executing all drug smugglers, drug sellers and drug users. Simple but not easy to do in a free society.
China has the solution. Maybe they don’t catch them all but repeat offenders must be pretty rare there. I doubt to that any of them waiting to face the firing squad have “lady” privileges, and bitch about the dinners like murderers do in western prisons.
And now, in that same China, they are making boatloads of fentanyl and mailing it over to America? How does that work?
Oh I get it. The Chinese govt must be running the labs, right? Same as when they “ended their drug problem” under Mao, so that he got monopoly and started selling it himself, to build up his army.
LEGALIZE IT ALL!
Prescription for the hard stuff, the synthetics, which are toxics meant only to be used by professionals
Re-legalize or reschedule organics, some public usage restrictions
Expand prescription organic opiate access for chronic pain (up to self-termination for terminal conditions)
Re-eliminate drug testing
Delist psyche drugs, ban child psyche drugs, decertify psychiatry
Severe restriction or retraction of vaccines and childhood schedule
No mandatory
Blanket ban mRNA and its research
Keep private abortifacients
Limited to medical abortion, restricted private abortion, no late term
Severe restriction/regulation of fetal body parts
(only allow umbilical cord blood or infant transplant)
Death sentence for adrenochrome harvesting and distribution
Death sentence for illegal organ harvesting and distribution
Expand local general practictioners (sole proprieters and S-corp clinics)
Break up corporate medicine
Remove insurance benefits from the tax code (return medicine to pay-as-you-go or financed by the hospital / doctor, with a menu of costs)
Walk-in medical malls
———————–
Exactly right about Mao; opium/opiates were legal* until Mao, who made it illegal to boost the profit margin, then went on to plant huge poppy farms in Southeast Asia, the original “Golden Triangle”. The Vietnam War was a war for drug turf by the governments, and a race and religious war by the locals (Khmer Verde, Jeune, and Rouge in Cambodia/Laos, Viet vs. Khia in Vietnam, Bhuddist vs. Catholic in former Indochina.)
*Legal, but subject to heavy tax. The Vice Merchant people’s advantage was shipping cheap, untaxed opium from the Raj (now Pakistan) to Han tongs who wanted to overthrow their Manchu (Mongol) government.
(FDR’s grandfather Delano was one of those hired captains, using a clipper ship, the racing boat of its time, to transport the cargoes.)
Ultimately, the corporate structures and illicit drug trafficking we have today are an inheritance from 400 years of the Spice Wars, the great age of piracy and deep ocean navies.
Sorry, edit: by delist psyche drugs, I mean severely restrict to clinically incarcerated psychotic patients only (as that was their original use, including the ones given to minors)
This is a political football.
High-gloss virtue signaling.
In fact, fentanyl component chemicals are delivered separately to British Columbia and Mexican ports. Assembly is done by criminals in labs in N.A. This is part of the intelligence that PT acted on and that the Canada gov. continues to deny with its 1% nonsense. If you want to legalize it legalize children taking rat poison in calibrated quantities. Same thing. More Canadians die every year than Canada lost in WW2. The CCP Opium War retribution must end.
Fentanyl, elephant tranquilizer (PCP is horse tranquilizer), came about because
1) heroin was made illegal in 1975, when it is the world’s most valuable painkiller with no physical side effects other than addiction (I’m skipping over the political history here)
2) corporate medicine, which is the death of Hippocratic practice and real doctoring, is run by autistic MBA beancounters who like fentanyl’s excessively cheap price as a replacement for organic heroin.
So, the solution is get corporate / politics out of medicine, and re-legalize organic heroin for hospital and medical use.
You see, that’s what a prescription regime is for; when you have something that can be used as a public good, but also has deleritous downside. You regulate its use, not make it a blanket crime, and grade its restriction accordingly.
Of course, political payoffs, criminal government, and unreported bank liquidity depend on the drug trade, so walking this cat back to 1925 when all drugs were legal, relatively unprofitable, and sold over the counter by a soda jerk in an ice cream store is going to be a tough row to hoe.
In the 1980s, The Economist, which was at the time, the only news magazine worth reading, did an entire issue on legalizing opiates.
It was extremely persuasive. It did include the political history, and from memory, one aspect of it was that in the UK, before the CIA pressured the UK into making heroin an illegal product, there was only 12 heroin addicts in the UK and they got their drugs for free from the state, and there was zero associated crime from it.
After they made it illegal, entire parts of London, I think an area called Leeds became squats for junkies and all about prostitution and crime after that.
I was fully convinced that legalizing, at least opiates was the way to go, and that the state should make it and give it away.
But going from here to that solution is not practical. At this point, we need to over correct to get back to a place where a solution is possible.
Like an orthopaedic surgeon re breaking a bone and setting it at an angle equally away from the original break so it heals straight, we need to come down like the hammer of God on all these networks,
The next issue is a much more difficult one to land on cleanly.
The issue of agency.
I have watched interviews with skid row fentanyl addicts who say that this drug is new in the sense that they have seen straight successful businessmen with a good life try fentanyl once and become skid row bums overnight.
This leads to at least an internal discussion about free will. The Economist argued that if you kidnapped a dozen regular happy folks, tied them down and gave them heroin till physical addiction, at least 10 and maybe 11 of them would go through withdrawal and get back to their lives, which they liked.
Fentanyl the number would be zero.
Therefore…
we can reasonably look at it as a weapon. A person could easily get doses of this drug involuntarily. And even voluntarily, none of them would sign up for it if they knew what it did most likely. Or at least very few.
For instance, if people were told about the real efficacy and effects of the mRNA shots, about no one would ever have taken it.
So like I say, harder to land cleanly on this issue.
Requires an adjustment to my personal epistemology on issues like free will.
Yes, it has become complicated. But what makes it a weapon? Prohibition. The stuff is dirt cheap to make. As the Brits found out a long time ago, you prohibit it and for those that make it, it’s Christmas all year round. What a boon for organized crime!
As for people getting addicted quickly… it’s the same argument they used to make with crack. You can’t resist it! Bull.
I was on massive (160 mg per day) doses of opioids for three months before they diagnosed me with acute pancreatitis, and I just hated it, hated the feeling like life was passing me by, was falling asleep all the time. Quit cold turkey. I had no withdrawal symptoms. Felt only relief. Then the pain came back and I was finally diagnosed.
I don’t think anyone should get the stuff for free. It’s like — in the days of alcohol prohibition — advocating rolling out barrels of booze to drunks on skid row — to save them from bathtub gin. Before prohibition, anyone could buy the stuff for pennies and did not have to go into crime to obtain it.
END THE DRUG WAR!
Can’t believe I made a king for a day post unrelated to Eeyore”s topic
(and wasted too much time doing it)
Please delete this embarrassment, thank you and sorry folks
ps- Baja Mexico has 2 Cninese factories pumping out precursors, the southern version of Vancouver, a $2 billion investment- yes, this is war, and war on Canada.
Thank you for breaking the Vancouver story!
It is a war on all of Western Civilization, the left hates the idea of individual rights and freedom. They want to establish a neo feudal society with themselves as the Royals and Nobles.
2. Perhaps someone here could shed some light on something for me. Over the years, I have heard/read claims of quantities of fentanyl being produced/seized that could kill millions. For example, the claim in the image for #2 indicates a super lab in BC could kill up to 4 million Canadians daily. If this is true, then where does this stuff go?. Scaling that claim to per year suggests that it is producing enough to terminate over 1 billion people per year. Obviously that many people are not oof-ing per year, so “Where does this stuff go?” If the numbers are to be believed, then the logical conclusion is that this stuff is getting stockpiled. If stockpiled, then when/where will it get applied or released and who will do so?
Remember the Danforth Avenue jihadi in Toronto a few years back? His brother was sitting on enough to kill everyone in North America at least once if not more. There was a ton of unanswered questions about that. They could never even figure out where he got the money to get that much.
So my imagination went to how that material could be used in an attack.
And frankly, it would be extremely easy to launch an attack with that material with very cheap devices. Of course I won’t describe what I am thinking because we are a communist country now, and I would likely get in more trouble for an accurate analysis than the people who are part of planning these attacks.
But if you imagine places where large numbers of people gather, and think about what sorts of things you get for a child’s birthday party…
I remember that news item. My own mind went to the same place, and it still does with these currently reported numbers. In cases like these, I hope that I am wrong.
It is also the type of stuff that makes me despise the media even more—being so blatantly incurious about logical ramifications. However, that in itself says much.