Trudeau, the Mullahs, Obiden and Cancel Culture destroys a good cop: Links 1 for December 10, 2024

Posted on by

1. Actually this new clip from Trudeau is a very logical follow from the one below it from around 6 years ago.

2. Scroll past the stuff about his rifle and go to where the meme using Tony Soprano is to start this short article on oddities around the rich, IQ130 elite who managed to get caught after shooting the Insurance Co. CEO.

By the way on average, there is about one fatal shooting a day in NYC. Just you know… for perspective.

The article starts with:

“As far as the news goes, I’m not buying the story about ‘The Adjuster’.”

Alex Berenson has questions as well.

3. Very sweet of Biden

4. This is a Twitter thread showing a massive number of hangings and executions by observant Muslims as they obliterate any kind of due process in Syria. I’ll hold my breath waiting for the marches and encampments in Ottawa to protest this action.

https://twitter.com/stairwayto3dom/status/1866518195516940447?s=19

5. The story of how a Windsor Police officer was cancelled because he did something fully legal and in keeping with the spirit of Canadian law. This is after all, what Cancel Culture is. The breaking of someone outside of the legal system, but in ways that use every aspect of society, even if the means to do so are illegal.

The whole text of the Tweet:

A highly respected officer of the Windsor Police Service, Constable Brisco made a $50 donation to the peaceful Freedom Convoy protest in early 2022. He donated privately and confidentially through the fundraising platform GiveSendGo. He did not mention that he was a police officer.

Like the 24 million Canadians who donate to deserving causes each year, Constable Brisco believed that he was exercising his freedom of expression by donating to something he believed in.

He believed that the Freedom Convoy was a peaceful and lawful protest. In fact, the day before he donated, a Superior Court judge in Ottawa had found that the protest was “…peaceful, lawful, and safe…” in the context of an interim ruling about the night-time horn-honking.

He donated anonymously. Or so he thought.

Soon after, the GiveSendGo donor list was illegally hacked and posted online. The Ontario Provincial Police obtained a copy of the list and forwarded it to the Windsor Police Service. Investigators began searching through the list for Ontario police officers who had donated to the Freedom Convoy protest.

Constable Brisco’s name was discovered.
Apparently, the Windsor Police Service had not been listening when an Ottawa judge had stated that the Freedom Convoy protest was legal. Instead, they had been listening to how politicians and newspaper headlines were characterizing the protest.

The Windsor Police Service charged Constable Brisco with “discreditable conduct” – a serious blemish on an otherwise perfect record of service.

Later, the Windsor Police Service forced Constable Brisco to forfeit 80 hours of pay as punishment.

The conviction of Constable Brisco sent a chilling message to all Canadians: illegally hacked information can be used against you. If you donate to the “wrong” cause (as determined by your employer, the government or other authorities), you can be publicly exposed and punished.

Meanwhile, the individual who committed this cybercrime has not been charged or prosecuted.
There is no clear and convincing evidence of discreditable conduct. In fact, the charge against Constable Brisco rests entirely on unfounded claims about the Freedom Convoy made by politicians and media outlets. A peaceful protest is not illegal just because politicians and headlines say so. Courts decide such questions, and no court has ruled that the Freedom Convoy protest was illegal.

There is no evidence of any link between the Freedom Convoy protest and the Ambassador Bridge Blockade, contrary to allegations made by the Windsor Police Service. And there is no evidence that the Ambassador Bridge Blockade in Windsor received any funds from the GiveSendGo campaign.

Law-abiding donors should never fear that their private information will be disclosed to – or used by – any arm of government, including law enforcement. The GiveSendGo donor list was illegally hacked, with police apparently condoning this illegal activity. What was produced by way of illegal activity should not count as evidence against Constable Brisco. Every Canadian should enjoy a reasonable expectation of privacy – protected by sections 7 and 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

As a police officer, Constable Brisco should have the same right to donate privately and confidentially to the causes of his choosing, like every other Canadian, regardless of his profession. His donation was a legitimate exercise of his freedom of expression – protected by section 2(b) of the Charter. Unfortunately, the Ontario Civilian Police Commission rejected these arguments in February 2024, dismissing his appeal.

His legal challenge is far from over, however.

In two days, on Wednesday, December 11, the Ontario Divisional Court will review the case of Constable Brisco. Administrative bodies like the Ontario Civilian Police Commission sometime make the wrong call. When they do, courts can review their decisions to ensure a fair, just, and constitutional outcome.

We seek to persuade the Court that Constable Brisco’s conviction and punishment were far from constitutional. For this, we ask for your help.

Please help by DONATING HERE ?
https://jccf.kindful.com/?utm_source=Justice+Centre+for+Constitutional+Freedoms+List&utm_campaign=94c0cdad3a-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2024_10_03_05_35_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b91efea778-4ccc361a6f-127694291&mc_cid=94c0cdad3a

Thank you all for reading this site.

Trudeau more than has it coming. We need him to be going.

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

3 Replies to “Trudeau, the Mullahs, Obiden and Cancel Culture destroys a good cop: Links 1 for December 10, 2024”

  1. The man dug deeper then I did to find out about the firearm, having said that he has the same questions about what happened that I do, this whole thing smells to high heaven of a left wing hit. The only difference in this case and the ANTIFA case is that this hit man doesn’t appear to be suicidal.

    He was radicalized in an Ivy League University, injured, then disappeared for awhile. My guess is this is when he received his firearms training and what training in Escape and Evasion that he used. Since he has been arrested we need to watch and see if someone isn’t going to help him commit suicide.

    The weapon used hits all of the current Gun Control buttons, another suspicious coincidence.

  2. 5- This cop should have given cash. Many people not privileged to see from the inside and to work for the corrupted state had more sense. It is a bit unfair, I realize, to say this in hindsight, but foresight was present in the suspicious intuition of the many cash givers.

    • I have to agree. However he may have had more faith in rule of law than we did at the time. Also he may have donated before the trucks got to Trudeaugrad. So not easy to do.

      Also when you give cash directly to the drivers, it isn’t fairly distributed. The trucks who made it to the most central spots would get donations while the ones kept away or at the various base stations around and in the city would get none.

      They needed a central pot of cash to make sure everyone could offset costs.
      Even so, you have a point.