Something really huge is happening in the Helen Grus hearings. Her lawyer is planning to come out and speak about the case publicly. This is big news.
Having sat in the hearing room on several occasions over the various weeks this hearing has been convened, I can say that while I do not know what she will say I do know what the tone of it will be.
I would recommend listening to as much of what she says Wednesday morning as possible. Not as much for Helen’s sake as for all of our sakes. This hearing is an astonishing example of how the legal system and all our institutions have been swapped out for a political process. Dialectics, yeah that.
These hearings, like Jan. 6 in the US, The Couts hearings, the trials of Pat King and Tamara Lich and others are so obviously not following a process of determining truth and setting an outcome based on that truth beyond a reasonable doubt. But to insure a predetermined political outcome which gives more power to the state at the expense of the truth rather than to maintain the truth as the key aspect of policy and crime & punishment.
Thanks to the incompetence of the hearing officer though, the Helen Grus hearings is perhaps the most transparent example of the lack of transparency in a hearing in order to guarantee the conclusion they want. When the man playing a judge in a hearing actually objects to a defence statement, and asks the prosecution if or why they are not objecting to what they hear, you know you have a clumsy and badly rehearsed star chamber. So much the better for our understanding of the process.
If it was done well, it would be much, much harder to prove the true nature of what we see.
And the conclusion they want is that Helen is guilty of whatever they say she is guilty of, in order that the public should never know that the mRNA injections killed a LOT of babies.
That simple explanation is not the heart of the matter.
The reason as stated above can be swapped out for anything. It is the process which is so dastardly.
If the state can tamper with all our systems for the purpose of hiding the truth about vaxx damage to babies, then they will, not can, but will for whatever other purpose they have at any given moment. To protect whatever other narrative attack they launch on the public.
This site reported on a plan by one or another of the federal or international agencies some months ago to make opposing the climate change narrative, itself a dialectical line of effort, a “hate crime”.
Speaking against the most obvious anti-truths you can think of, I dunno, let’s say if a man says he is a woman he is a real woman. And to stop him from accessing all things reserved for women would be a “hate crime” or whatever. Once you have gone there, there is no where the dialectical engineers won’t go. And as this epistemology of the left is strictly and only about a never ending path of destruction, we can understand how once homosexuality was fully normalized, homosexuals became cancelled unless they went along with the next Line of Action. The Trans-movement. And that now is already becoming normalized and is being cancelled as establishment as the left moves to normalize paedophelia. And that will be cancelled once it becomes normalized, and why wouldn’t it, parents already celebrate the castration and radical hysterectomies of their own children today. And then it will move to incest. And after incest maybe Necrophilia. After all, its permitted in the Koran, right? And in sharia law so long as the wife hasn’t been dead too long. Or should I say ‘Metabolically challenged’.
Anyone surprised about this?
The man who wrote the public school sex ed curricula in Ontario under the watchful eye of Premiere Kathleen Wynn, spent serious jail time for promoting paedophelia and incest.
Caught by undercover officers online, the world-renowned educator, UofT prof and former member of Kathleen Wynne’s transition team was a frequent visitor to an incest chat room where he counselled single moms on how to sexually assault their daughters for his pleasure and theirs, a site where his profile listed his sexuality as “nothing is taboo.” In one disgusting sampling read out in court, the depraved Levin told one London “mom” he’d like to “f— all 3 (of her children) in front of you with your help…would they submit or would I need to tie them?”
Really. This was Wynn’s Minister of Education.
So PLEASE read these Tweets and try and follow as much as you can of what Helen Grus’ lawyer has to say on Wednesday.
Full text:
DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY
@DonaldBestCA
?BREAKING: DETECTIVE GRUS CASE?
Lead Defense Counsel Bath-Shéba van den Berg to break her silence on The Lavigne Show on Wednesday June 19th 10am Eastern.
This is a tremendous journalistic coup for
@JasonLavigneMP
.
Lawyer Van den Berg (and co-counsel Blair Ector) have refused to speak with news media since being retained by
@OttawaPolice
Detective Helen Grus in about September, 2022.
Also appearing on the show is Dr. James Thorp
@jathorpmfm
– one of five defense expert witnesses rejected by Tribunal Officer Superintendent Chris Renwick (retired) in a very contentious and overtly biased decision.
Detective Grus faces an internal disciplinary charge of Discreditable Conduct for daring to commence a criminal investigation into the potential connection between jabbed mothers and a cluster of deceased breast-feeding infants in the Ottawa area.
She was suspended in February 2022, ordered back to work in October 2022 and has faced weeks of hearings and motion dates since then. Her trial is due to resume in about January of 2025 with the prosecution continuing the cross-examination of Detective Grus who took the stand in her own defense.
DON’T MISS THIS SHOW!!!
The first 30 minutes of the show will be public on all the usual channels – but the unrestricted information continues in the Members Only area – for which you must be a member (not a subscriber).
Membership is not automatically granted and must be applied for at:
https://thelavigneshow.com/members
You can find many articles about the Grus case at my website. Start with this comprehensive list…
So watch the Mark Lavigne show on Wednesday morning. Helen’s outcome is all of ours.
Related Kansas sues Pfizer
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/it-begins-kansas-sues-pfizer-state-alleges-company/
The State of Kansas outlines several specific allegations in its lawsuit:
1. Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine.
2. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.
3. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public.
4. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.
5. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.
6. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years.
7. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas.
8. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., regardless of whether any individual consumer ultimately received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
9. Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-truth-about-spanish-flu-a-man-made-medical-disaster/
The ‘de-feminization of women: I went grocery shopping today.
At the checkout counter… one couple and the woman is fully tattoed. In front of her is another woman who is also fully tattoed. As strangers, they embrace; they belong to a club, the tattoo club.
This last woman boasts about the costs of her neck-to-toe tattoo job: $180/hour and it took seven hours to fully cover one side of her body in intricate ink. Both sides are covered. The only clear skin is her face and her hands.
Behind me, is a lone female who is in awe of the tattooed women. She has a few tattoos. She speaks of her young teen daughter who just had her entire arm tattoed up to the top of her neck. Hooked on tattoos, her daughter can’t wait to get the other side tattooed also. The mother encourages her.
The cashier and I, we exchanged many glances, all muted bewilderment.
Finally, I told the woman behind me to stop her daughter before it’s too late. Ideologies come and go but tattoos are for life. She’ll see them forever in the mirror. The woman was taken aback by my comment and went on the defensive. I let her go, I said what I had to.
And that is my story for today. When women rush to cover their skin in junk for the rest of their lives, from neck to toe, their kids hop on the bandwagon, and true feminity is lost forever.