Two seemingly opposite views of the Russia Vs the World war, yet both likely true

At this site we are very familiar with this particular British MP. He has been the only one to really bring the issue of the damage and corruption surrounding the mRNA shots to Parliament in the UK and of course, how he has been treated has been well documented, especially by Dr. John Campbell.

In this clip he is explaining how the UK is already at war with Russia. His statements about how NATO has provoked them are factually correct. And we could add more. Russia had a casus Belli well beyond just the NATO encroachment in defiance of the agreement post cold-war. The speech by Poreshenko in 2014 is a pretty good reason for the people of the Donbas to want Russian help.

Here is Poroshenko in 2014 explaining how he plans to screw over the people of the Donbas. Perhaps because they voted to go with Russia in a referendum. Perhaps an expert can correct us on that in the comments.

Below, two experts on Russia, one of whom is former CIA officer, Clare Lopez. She speaks about the nature of Russian disinformation along with the other woman in the video.

They are quite correct. Russia weaponized disinformation when it was the Soviet Union in a formal way to the extent that it is a very powerful weapon. In fact that is what Western governments have been using agains Western people now for several years with terrible effect. So they are correct that it is being used against us to distort our view of the conflict in Ukraine.

This post is not meant to be a difinitive answer on the right or wrong of the situation at all. Just to create the correct space to allow doubt to make room for a pathway to what might actually be the truth.