1. The revenge of the Nazis. How a legacy Nazi is taking down the entire US judicial system
2. On the massive, 90B$ losses incurred by Google for its Winston Smithing of history through its AI image/video generator.
What is a little irritating to this site is that suddenly this event cost Google this much. We have been posting actual court-worthy evidence for well over a decade that Google breaks its OWN STATED RULES to give a neo-Marxist search result as opposed to the one its own rules state should be given. One article by an actual expert, not like the parachuted epidemiologists used to hump the vaccines and lock downs expert, but a real one from the private sector explained how Google returned false results on the word, Jihad, in order to deflect from its de facto and de jure meanings of attacks for the supremacy of Islam to some kind of inner reflection for self betterment like a Buddhist or something. Buddhists who of course, are frequent victims of actual jihad along with statuary of same. That was several years ago. Searching for it on our history, I have found likely a hundred other articles or videos on Google’s applied bias and all the same way. here is a fun one from an actual engineer at Google.
I wish I could reinitialize the search engine at VladTepes. but it was used to take the site down in seconds and still would be I have been recently informed. Maybe search with DuckDuckgo for: vladtepesblog google bias and see what you get. The above deals primarily with how a cultural bias at Google is reenforced by policy. But the article on Jihad was 100% proof of policy at Google, probably directed by Obama’s Office of the CVE. At the time, a VP of Google was actually working at the White House and the pentagon all at the same time. I believe his name was Matt Cutts if memory serves, and his expertise was in Search Engine Manipulation. That should have been enough to bring down Google altogether. That was serious political interference with the search engine at a level that had practical and destructive results. But it took the comical over-reach of generating black nazis to cause a blip on Google’s share price.
3. Both Canada, the US and Ireland are vying for the Mao Oppression award this month. Lets have a look at the entry by both:
Irish Senator Sharon Keogan
Tucker Carlson on the American entry:
Canada passed a bill in the last week or so which qualifies as the Operation Lockstep equivalent:
EDITORIAL: Here come the internet police
Four of the seven categories the legislation is aimed at removing from social media appear to be reasonable, although it will depend on precise definitions and enforcement in each category.When it comes to the Trudeau government’s long-awaited online harms bill released Monday, the devil will be in the details.
Those are (1) content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor of abuse; (2) intimate content communicated without consent (for example, revenge porn); (3) content used to bully a child; and (4) content that induces a child to harm themselves. The larger problem arises in the remaining three categories — (1) content that foments hatred; (2) content that incites violent extremism or terrorism; and (3) content that incites violence.
These are broad categories open to wide interpretation that, when misapplied, can chill free speech; plus we already have criminal laws against hate speech.
That the Trudeau government intends to create two new federal bureaucracies to administer and enforce this new legislation is deeply concerning when it comes to the issue of free speech.
(We’ll look for more better on the Canadian entry. Trudeau’s history shows he introduced totalitarian legislation with a kind of semantic lubricant. The “online harms” bill of course will mean political censorship and punishment in much the same way that the “anti-conversion therapy” law, Bill C-6 means anyone who tries to talk a child out of being sexually mutilated and sterilized before they are old enough to have a tattoo or a beer is guilty of a crime, but not the raging commie who talked them into it.)
As concerning are provisions in the bill to create a new “definition of ‘hatred’ in the Criminal Code,” increase “penalties for existing hate propaganda offences,” create “a standalone hate crime offence” and “an additional set of remedies for online hate speech in the Canadian Human Rights Act.” The risk of government overreach in all of these areas is obvious — including a potential life sentence for “advocating or promoting genocide against an identifiable group” and up to five years for other hate propaganda offences.
https://twitter.com/RealAndyLeeShow/status/1762662906850865574?t=gr-5-P4ZU-s09i-28_b7Bg&s=19
5. We frequently refer to CBC as a weapon, as opposed to an information service as it represents itself. A few minutes of this will make it clear why. Please listen for the communist initiate language used. “Equitably phase out fossil fuels” etc.
Thank you for checking out this site
1- Daddy always said Hungarians should run the world, but he didn’t mean it this way.
# 4. About that EMA.
Vlad, your link didn’t work so I’ll repost it here: https://twitter.com/RealAndyLeeShow/status/1762874904599298506
Curiouser and curiouser. I’ve got this.
https://twitter.com/RuthJon62041627/status/1763226592011002128