Lara Logan testimony on Freedom of Speech to Senate Committee

Posted on by

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

7 Replies to “Lara Logan testimony on Freedom of Speech to Senate Committee”

  1. For the life of me,can’t understand how intelligent people can be so wrong about something so evident and for the public,and private good.We are even seeing an increase in parents who oppose vaccinating their children. WTF. Quote me. Just sayin’.

    • If your only objection to her testimony is concerning the vaxx, then it has nothing to do with intelligence. It has to do with loss of trust.

      Authorities lied about the vaxx. This is a fact. This doesn’t mean it was bad for you or didn’t work. It meant that they lied about it’s safety and efficacy and forced people to take it based on a lie.

      Once people know that, they lose trust, in a system based on trust.

      Life is too complicated to be an expert on everything you have to deal with in a day. So we specialize. A society like that has to be based on trust and that, for those who recognized the lie, was shattered. And they reject all vaccines now.

      This is a rational response, even if it is wrong. And IMO the jury is out on it being wrong.

    • For the life of me, I can’t understand how a doctor in the US was smart enough to veto the Swine Flu shots and Canada allowed them. Finally after 4600 people died they stopped them. For the life of me I do not understand how someone who claims to be intelligent can STILL argue the safety and efficacy of these so-called vaccine when millions are dead or vaccine injured.

      Children and young adults were NEVER threatened by Covid-19. The numbers of vaccine dead and injured are staggering.

      Anyone who is still beating the drum for these vaccines must surely be….

      • Three words:

        Defending their purchase.

        That is for the honest among them. For the rest, its the hidden agenda.

    • The Nazis had a phrase which covered all the abuses by the state.
      “Fur Ihre Sicherheit” — “It’s for your safety”.

      Triggered
      Nadine Yousif Aug. 26, 2021
      For the life of me, I could not imagine a “mental health” reporter writing “ “When it comes to empathy for the unvaccinated, I have no empathy for them. Unvaccinated Covid patients do not deserve ICU beds. I have no empathy left for the unvaccinated. Let the, die”.

      Irresponsible or fanning the fear
      For the life of me I can’t imagine why the Toronto Star would allow such irresponsible hate speech

      • Hate speech is a semantic weapon. It has nothing to do with hate, or even speech other than protecting the revolution.

        It will ONLY be applied to those who resist the revolution and never applied to enforcers of state diktats.

        • i.e. Outgoing NIH Director Francis Collins lamented about the Great Barrington Declaration was “getting a lot of attention” There needs to be a quick and DEVASTATING TAKEDOWN of its premises”, the NIH Director told his colleagues Lawrence Tabak, Cliff Lane and Anthony Fauci in an email October 2020.

          The Great Barrington Declaration sought to end lockdowns, opting for an approach they dubbed “ Focus Protection”, which would aspire to achieve “herd immunity” while protecting the vulnerable.

          Perhaps this explains how we came to the “First time in history that the ineffectiveness of a medicine is being blamed on those who haven’t taken it”.