FDA rescinds Hydroxychloroquine ban

Thank you Tania Groth

I feel that we should remember the man who actually told us all in every way and at every opportunity he could, that HCQ worked. Twitter, Youtube and all other “social” media (Judo-propaganda) sites removed him. Digitally ostracized him for telling us things that could save hundreds of thousands of lives. Even if they did not know it worked, and you can bet the family farm, the principle people at Youtube and Twitter etc. etc. knew full well it was effective, they need to feel the heat for what they did. This is a pitchforks and torches moment. The elite actually conspired to silence people who told the truth about HCQ. Dr. Zev Zelenko was the FIRST person to trumpet his protocol to the public. HCQ+Zinc+Zpac with which he saved a lot of lives.

Frankly, Fauci, Zuckerberg, Dorsey and many more should be placed in the Jefferey Epstein memorial cell. Who knows. Maybe they got the camera fixed by now.


About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

14 Replies to “FDA rescinds Hydroxychloroquine ban”

  1. Health Canada to this day lists retracted studies (and, incidentally, the WHO decision which was based on those blatant frauds) as justification for their Hydroxychloroquine ban.

    Tells you a lot about the intellectual caliber and/or moral integrity of our “top doctors”.

    • HEALTH CANADA – Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine can have serious side effects. These drugs should be used only under the supervision of a physician.

      Ottawa – Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine may cause serious side effects, including serious heart rhythm problems. The risk of these side effects may increase at higher doses, or if the drugs are used in combination with other drugs, such as the antibiotic azithromycin.

      […]Health Canada has not authorized any drugs to prevent, treat or cure COVID-19Footnote1 and has warned Canadians about products making false and misleading claims.

      […]The effects on heart rhythm, which in the most serious cases, may be fatal.

      […]Remdesivir is the first drug to be authorized in Canada for the treatment of COVID-19.



      Government of Canada – Ad-hoc COVID-19 Clinical Pharmacology Task Group: Statement on hydroxychloroquine


      The ad-hoc Clinical Pharmacology Task Group recommends against the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for patients with COVID-19 due to negligible evidence of efficacy and significant potential for harm leading to a high risk-to-benefit ratio.

      […}Use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients has been associated with serious safety signals, mostly notably life-threatening arrhythmias.

      The Clinical Pharmacology Task Group noted a high risk-to-benefit ratio for hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19, based on limited early data in hospitalized patients.


      MAY 11 2021 – global news – ‘Don’t worry about it’: Dubious online pharmacies push unlicensed COVID-19 treatments

      […]During the first six months of the pandemic, border officials stopped at least 535 illegal shipments of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine from entering Canada.

      The medications, meant to treat illnesses like malaria, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, have been found ineffective by scientists at preventing and treating COVID-19.

      This hasn’t stopped conspiracy theorists and some politicians, including former U.S. president Donald Trump, from touting the drugs as magical cure-alls for the virus.

      […]“These drugs are known to potentially cause liver or kidney problems, low blood sugar and nervous system problems, such as dizziness, fainting, or seizures,” said Health Canada spokesperson Geoffroy Legault-Thivierge. “The effects on heart rhythm, in the most serious cases, may be fatal.”

      […]Spread of disinformation

      Despite claims made by conspiracy theorists, anti-vaxxers and some medical professionals that hydroxychloroquine can treat COVID-19, it’s not approved for treating the novel coronavirus in either Canada or the United States.

      In the earliest days of the pandemic, researchers began clinical trials to see if any existing medications, including hydroxychloroquine, might be useful against the novel coronavirus. This strategy of trial and error is common when new viruses emerge because it often takes years to develop and thoroughly test new medications.

      While a few early studies showed promising results linked to hydroxychloroquine, the overwhelming majority of research has found that the drug is completely useless at stopping COVID-19.

      […]Joe Schwarcz, a chemist and McGill University’s director of science and society, said disinformation campaigns about these medications and other non-treatments for COVID-19, especially by members of the medical community, are disturbing.

      He said the motivations for spreading these kinds of unfounded conspiracy theories — like the idea that big pharma, doctors and politicians are part of a global syndicate determined to hide the true benefits of hydroxychloroquine — are fantasies that in some cases are rooted in straight-up criminal activity, greed or delusion.

      “What can I tell you? It’s sickening,” he said.

      There are several groups in the United States, Canada and elsewhere that actively spread disinformation about unauthorized “treatments” for COVID-19.

      […]To date, there have been dozens of studies that looked at chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, vitamin C and other possible ways of treating COVID-19, and the results have almost always been the same — nothing works.

      MORE :


    • HEALTH CANADA – Clinical management of patients with COVID-19: Second interim guidance

      This guidance document is presently undergoing revisions. It has been endorsed by: Canadian Critical Care Society and Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease (AMMI) Canada.

      This guidance has been adapted for Canadian use from the WHO document entitled Clinical management of COVID-19: interim guidance, 27 May 2020.

      People infected with SARS-CoV-2 may be infectious before symptom onset




      PARAGRAPH 10.0 Specific and adjunctive COVID-19 treatments and clinical research

      There are many ongoing clinical trials testing various potential medical treatments. Until specific therapies become available, any medication should be given as part of a randomized controlled trial.

      Collect standardized clinical data on all hospitalized patients to improve our understanding of the natural history of disease.

      Among hospitalized adult patients who have COVID-19 and require supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation, clinicians should strongly consider dexamethasone 6 mg IV daily for 10 days (or until discharge if earlier) or equivalent glucocorticoid dose.

      The recommendation is based on the data from a preliminary report of the RECOVERY trial comparing the use of 6 mg of dexamethasone given once daily for up to ten days. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality in more than 6,400 patients randomly allocated (1:2) to receive dexamethasone or usual care.

      While the trial demonstrated benefit of dexamethasone use in patients who required supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation, it did not reduce mortality in patients who did not require respiratory support at randomization (17.8% vs. 14%, RR 1.18 [95% CI 0.91 to 1.55]).

      There are currently no data on the use of dexamethasone in children with severe disease who require supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation, hence clinical judgement should be applied if considering use.

      If oral, IV and/or inhaled steroids are indicated for non-COVID-19 reasons (for example, asthma or COPD exacerbation, or stress dosing in someone on chronic steroids or with known adrenal insufficiency), they should not be avoided.

      Consider the use of Remdesivir, either as a therapy or preferably as part of a randomized controlled trial.

      Data from a preliminary report of a multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial [ACTT]) of hospitalized patients with severe disease who received Remdesivir showed a shorter median time to clinical recovery compared to patients who received placebo (11 vs 15 days; rate ratio for recovery 1.32 [95% CI 1.12 to 1.55]). The benefit of Remdesivir on reducing time to recovery was highest among patients who were not intubated but required supplemental oxygen. In mechanically ventilated patients who received Remdesivir there was no observed decrease in time to recovery. Health Canada has authorized the use of Remdesivir for adults and adolescents aged 12 and over, and clinical trials are presently underway in children.

      Do not use hydroxychloroquine or ritonavir/lopinavir outside of a clinical trial.

      The use of hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir-ritonavir in COVID-19 patients was recently reported in a large randomized, controlled, open-label, adaptive, platform trial (the RECOVERY trial). In the hydroxychloroquine arm of the trial, patients were randomised to receive either hydroxychloroquine (n=1,561) or usual care (n=3,155). There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of 28-day mortality or beneficial effects on hospital stay duration. In the lopinavir-ritonavir arm of the trial, patients were randomised to receive lopinavir-ritonavir (n=1,596) or usual care (n=3,376). There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of 28-day mortality, the risk of progression to mechanical ventilation or length of hospital stay. Based on these results, the use of hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir-ritonavir in COVID-19 patients should not be considered outside of a clinical trial setting.

      Use of investigational anti-COVID-19 therapeutics should be done under ethically approved, randomized, controlled trials.

      MORE :



      Footnote # 96 links to this study :

      Effect of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: Preliminary results from a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial.


      […]Conclusions: In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine was not associated
      with reductions in 28-day mortality but was associated with an increased length of hospital stay
      and increased risk of progressing to invasive mechanical ventilation or death.


  2. I keep asking: is the ban on effective treatment being denied to so many who died, a case for a major class action, not against the government per se, but against the bureaucratic advisors responsible for such policies? I distinguish here as most leaders depend upon the “sound” advice of their “experts’.

    Such a class action might uncover the behind the scenes actions of such “advisors” and induce a flush of the politics controlling bureaucracies throughout the west.

    None of this garbage about what they thought or why they deliberately banned these medications is acceptable to those who lost loved ones when the actual evidence proved the contrary. This could be the key to a major cleansing.

    • And had they have treated people to save their lives and not closed operating rooms down, and delayed so many life saving operations….how many people died from lack of proper medical care and how many people have life long side effects from the lack of medical attention…..

      Are the COVID number of deaths actually from COVID, or just inflated numbers? Some honest hospital workers say the numbers have been fudged badly.

      A friend of mine who is a vet said there are too many political people in medicine.

      Drug companies reward Doctors and hospitals for their loyalties.

      After all the lockdowns, I personally do not know one person who has had COVID. I know it is out there and terrible BUT people are not dropping in the streets…………

  3. The only theory that makes sense to me as to why there was such a big push against hydroxychloroquine is that it was the Chinese Government who engineered the hoax for the purpose of making a regime change in the USA. I simply have trouble believing that an American would do such a terrible thing to his own country but I do know that Trump was standing up to the Chinese in a most unacceptable way and that he’s gone today despite being extremely popular. I also think the Chinese are probably behind Black Lives Matter and Antifa and all the other goons who burnt down the cities last year. They are making the West look like a shithole and our so-called “Democracy” look like an unworkable disaster that simply does not work anymore, if it ever did… I’ll bet the people of Beijing and Tehran all know where “George Floyd Square” is and which racist hell-hole murdered him for the crime of being black. Death to America. It’s not as if the bad guys are hiding their intentions…

    • You are far to kind to lunatic leftists who have no country and believe in world society preferably Marxist. I do not know if you have ever debated with these creatures but no matter what facts you place upon them they totally ignore them and just repeat the mantras. to all intents and purposes they have been totally reprogrammed and the input to new material blocked as if it is a virus. Braindead or zombie while rude is apt.

    • It is what it is,Chris.But for just once I would like to see a more conservative President like Trump who embraces evidence-based science and policy.Trump had an opportunity to bring some common sense,practical,non-PC policy to America,but because of his glaring flaws,blew those opportunities.
      Now,I fought for White-ruled Rhodesia,and found Ian D Smith a decent,common-sense leader who I could follow,even at the price of defeat.Just sayin’.

      • Trump had two major flaws as president: his naivete(not being a professional politician) which assumed that the bureaucrats were honest when they actively opposed >80% of his efforts and his personality as he does not suffer fools gladly. But when you have a leader who is the right man this should not matter.
        Churchill had many flaws but he was the right man for the time.
        Rhodesia was so backstabbed by the USA and the UK that many of us will not forget or forgive. My condolences there.

  4. You do yourselves and the Right generally no favours when you so readily dismiss evidence based science and policy.Many of you and your loved ones are alive and healthier today because of science.Just sayin’.

  5. Ivan Illich – Limits to medicine. Medical nemesis: the expropriation of health

    Modern medicine is a negation of health.

    It isn’t organized to serve human health, but only itself, as an institution.

    It makes more people sick than it heals.

    Healthy people are those who live in healthy homes on a healthy diet; in an environment equally fit for birth, growth work, healing, and dying…

    Healthy people need no bureaucratic interference to mate, give birth, share the human condition and die.

    PDF – 200 pages –



    published in 1974

    Content :

    PART I. Clinical latrogenesis

    The Epidemics of Modern Medicine
    Doctors’ Effectiveness—an Illusion
    Useless Medical Treatment
    Doctor-Inflicted Injuries
    Defenseless Patients

    PART II. Social latrogenesis

    The Medicalization of Life
    Political Transmission of Iatrogemc Disease
    Social latrogenesis
    Medical Monopoly
    Value-Free Cure?
    The Medicalization of the Budget
    The Pharmaceutical Invasion
    Diagnostic Imperialism
    Preventive Stigma
    Terminal Ceremonies
    Black Magic
    Patient Majorities

    PART III. Cultural latrogenesis

    The Killing of Pain
    The Invention and Elimination of Disease
    Death Against Death
    Death as Commodity
    The Devotional Dance of the Dead
    The Danse Macabre
    Bourgeois Death
    Clinical Death
    Trade Union Claims to a Natural Death
    Death Under Intensive Care

    PART IV. The Politics of Health

    Specific Counterproductivity
    Political Countermeasures
    Consumer Protection for Addicts
    Equal Access to Torts
    Public Controls over the Professional Mafia
    The Scientific Organization—of Life
    Engineering for a Plastic Womb
    The Recovery of Health
    Industrialized Nemesis
    From Inherited Myth to Respectful Procedure
    The Right to Health
    Health as a Virtue


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.