Its official: Big pharma paid off the lancet, NEJM, to publish a phoney study panning Hydroxychloroquine, killing hundreds of thousands of people

And lets be clear. Google, Twitter, Facebook, are equally complicit. They blocked all attempts to explain the true science and facts of HCQ. And I am certain MANY of us will have a very hard time trusting anyone in medicine again without real scrutiny.


FDA rescinds Hydroxychloroquine ban

Thank you Tania Groth

I feel that we should remember the man who actually told us all in every way and at every opportunity he could, that HCQ worked. Twitter, Youtube and all other “social” media (Judo-propaganda) sites removed him. Digitally ostracized him for telling us things that could save hundreds of thousands of lives. Even if they did not know it worked, and you can bet the family farm, the principle people at Youtube and Twitter etc. etc. knew full well it was effective, they need to feel the heat for what they did. This is a pitchforks and torches moment. The elite actually conspired to silence people who told the truth about HCQ. Dr. Zev Zelenko was the FIRST person to trumpet his protocol to the public. HCQ+Zinc+Zpac with which he saved a lot of lives.

Frankly, Fauci, Zuckerberg, Dorsey and many more should be placed in the Jefferey Epstein memorial cell. Who knows. Maybe they got the camera fixed by now.


Fauci KNEW Hydroxychloroquine worked and told his own family to get it

Going through the emails myself, I have not found Fauci telling people he gave it to his family. But I have found a LOT of interesting things by searching this pDF online or downloaded, for Hydroxychloroquine. SOmetimes they spell it differently or code it a bit though. Like Hydrox. Or Chloroquine, or Hycrox- etc.

One fascinating find, is that it was CHINA that sent a memo saying Hydroxychloroquine showed promise against Covid 19!

I have a feeling we are in for a rough ride coming up.

Trudeau, Fauci liars. Trump right and could have saved hundreds of thousands with HCQ

At this point, its looking like its definitive that the right early treatment beats Covid and none of these drastic measures are necessary

First, a video from shortly after Covid-measures ruined everything, but a few doctors had learned of Hydroxychloroquine plus Zinc and Z-pac and used it to great success.

The following video is from April 11, 2021. A doctor in Italy basically ended the Covid issue in one region entirely by early treatment using HCQ and/or Ivermectin. The numbers are stunning. and then the issue must be raised, why is this not happening everywhere? This is also discussed:

(Thanks to Dr. Andrew Bostom for sending in this clip)

And maybe we need to take another look at what happened to an Alberta Church today:

Seems like a lot of people have known for a long time that there is effective treatments for Covid that would have made all these government overreach methods unnecessary. So the question is, why have these treatments been not just not used, but suppressed to the point where doctors and pharmacists would be punished for using these treatments for early Covid patients?

This site has dozens of testimonials by various doctors on the use of Ivermectine as well as hydroxychloroquin. I just selected two because one was right at the start, and one was yesterday. We also have another video from Brazil which reports a similar thing. That early (but unspecified) treatment took one area of Brazil from the hardest hit with Covid deaths to the least deaths in the country. But in the interview he does not specify the treatment used, but we have it on some authority that it was Ivermectin and/or HCQ+Zinc.

Then of course, there is this testimony to a Senate committee. Youtube deleted this video. To be clear, a private company obliged not to be a publisher by law but a platform, deleted something in the official public record from a Senate Homeland and Security panel:

Hydroxychloroquine: A study of studies

Many at this site, certainly including its author, has had a strong feeling that the banning of Hydroxychloroquine early on, points to the very core of the reality, whatever that may be, of Covid 19. We tracked how a couple of studies had been faked, or major medical magazine published utter rubbish about it. Publications like The Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine. It turns out that the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based medicine produced a study panning HCQ because they elected to use it as a poison, rather than a medication by administering it at two to what, eight times? the recommended maximum dose.

In the video below, Dr. John Campbell goes in to great detail on all these studies. And for the most part, those of us who smelled fraud and misdirection around HCQ are vindicated.

However, I was very wrong about one major aspect of the way I thought about the use of HCQ. Many of the studies used Hydroxychloroquine alone, or with ZPAC, a popular antibiotic used to treat the opportunistic respiratory infection that causes a cytokine storm, which often occurs in advanced Covid 19 infections and is frequently the ultimate cause of death. But the person who first brought HCQ to our attention, Dr, Zev Zelenko, explains why HCQ works at all. He claims that HCQ is what is called, a Zinc ionophor. That is to say, it allows zinc to permeate the cell more easily, and it is the zinc that stops the virus from reproducing, and so HCQ in the absence of Zinc is like testing drivers to see if wine causes judgement issues by getting subject to drink grape juice.

To my surprise though, it turns out that HCQ has something very close to a THIRTY PERCENT reduced mortality rate ALL ON IT’S OWN without any Zinc in the mix at all!

Sometimes its great to be wrong.

Post Script:

Since HCQ was made impossible to get for treatment of Covid19, people turned to another zinc ionophor, Quercetin. Its not as effective at getting zinc into cells, but it still works and is recommended by Zev Zelenco as a prophylaxis.

As Biden Became President, Medical Journal Quietly Retracted Study That Claimed Hydroxychloroquine Is Ineffective

***The National File used a reasonably new tweet, January 18th, as the basis of this, but the tweet leads to an article from The Guardian which is over 7 months old! So while the story is true, and the important aspects of it, that HCQ was falsely demonized, the idea that its being vindicated with Biden’s assumption to the throne is misrepresented here.***

How many did the Democrat Party and the enemy propaganda media kill to get President Trump out of their way.

From The National File:

Their retraction-admission validates what President Trump stated in the very beginning of the pandemic January 21, 2021

A leading medical journal has issued a retraction of their endorsement for a study that concluded the anti-viral drug hydroxychloroquine was ineffective against the COVID-19 virus. This retraction appears to validate the claims then-President Trump made about the medication being a frontline drug in the battle in the pandemic.
The Lancet, a respected online medical journal, issued an apology to its readers in an edition last year after the retraction. “We deeply apologize to you, the editors, and the journal readership for any embarrassment or inconvenience that this may have caused,” the publishers of The Lancet said.

Compared to the significantly more expensive medications being used to treat the virus, hydroxychloroquine – a drug widely used to treat malaria – is relatively inexpensive and universally available. Hydroxychloroquine ranges in price from $0.30 to $6.63 per dose depending on location.

HCQ Approved by Judged order in Italy and much more: Links 2, January 12, 2021

1. Well, Boris Johnson is a disappointment isn’t he?

Boris Demands Brits Follow Lockdown Rules Amidst Controversy over PM’s Alleged Cycling Trip Miles from Home

(If we want to stick with something like empirical reality, once you have actually had the Wuhan Flu and recovered from it, you shouldn’t have to worry about it for the rest of your life. So what he is doing is actually perfectly fine in terms of public health. He can’t get it, and nor can he spread it. And I don’t give a damn about any symbolism. If you are immune and can’t spread it then there simply is no excuse for containing or restricting people. But: The definition of herd immunity has now been officially changed to only allow for a high enough percentage of vaccinations and the aspect of a percent of the population having had a disease and gotten over it was eliminated. And the measures being enforced everywhere do not include a pass for people who are immune. So this isn’t about a disease. This is about politics. And it makes Johnson a hypocrite because no one else has freedom who is immune.)

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has threatened that if Britons are not following coronavirus rules — “we may have to do more” — and impose stricter measures.

Mr Johnson made the remarks on Monday after media reported sources saying that the government was considering enforcing harsher measures, including banning Britons from leaving the house more than once a week.

The prime minister said, according to the Evening Standard: “We’re going to keep the rules under constant review. Where we have to tighten them, we will.”

He continued: “In supermarkets, people need to be keeping their distance, making sure that they’re wearing masks, doing the right thing.

“We need to enforce the rules in supermarkets. When people are getting takeaway drinks, in cafes, then they need to avoid spreading the disease there, avoid mingling too much.”

Reiterating the point that the government will crack down harder on people’s freedoms if they are perceived to not be abiding by lockdown rules, he added: “Of course, if we feel that things are not being properly observed then we may have to do more.”

The remarks come after Sunday’s Cabinet coronavirus meeting, with a government source telling the Evening Standard earlier on Monday that the prime minister’s concern was sparked by seeing so many people out of their houses and taking fresh air in London’s parks.

2. Al-Qaeda has a new base in Iran: Pompeo. (This is quite interesting)

3. Ruling gives green light for controversial COVID-19 therapy

Administrative judges overrule regulator to authorize hydroxychloroquine.

Doctors in Italy are once again authorized to prescribe hydroxychloroquine to COVID-19 patients. On 11 December, the Consiglio di Stato, Italy’s highest administrative court, suspended a ban previously imposed by the drug regulator Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA), that allowed such use of the drug only for clinical trials.

In Italy, as in most other countries, hydroxychloroquine is only approved for malaria and some auto-immune diseases. In the early phases of the pandemic it attracted interest as a possible antiviral drug against Sars-Cov2. Several clinical trials started, and in April AIFA, in line with the Food and Drug Administration in the United States, granted an emergency authorisation for its off-label use. But in late May, when clinical trials failed to prove the drug’s efficacy, AIFA suspended the authorization for use by physicians, leaving only the possibility to test the drug in clinical trials. The FDA in the USA and the MHRA in the UK have taken similar steps to revoke early authorisations of hydroxychloroquine, and the European Medicines Agency has recommended caution in using the drug, which can have serious side effects.

4. PBS Principle Counsel incites political violence in radical left wing agenda MUST WATCH

What did ex-weatherman Larry Grathwohl have to say about killing lots and lots of people in the US? (Not sure when this interview was done. Probably the 1960/1970 though)

5. Secret Trudeau Wuhan Flu isolation facility in Yukon.

Thank you all who read and sent in answers filling in blanks on posts. We at VladTepesBlog deeply appreciate this community.

‘Only a one in 17 billion chance hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work’: medical professor

From SKY News, an interview with a Prof. who treats patients with Covid19, then caught it himself.

Hydroxychloroquine really works says Professor of Medicine Dr Peter McCullough, describing the treatment as “the most widely used therapeutic” to treat COVID-19 in the world. “The chances that it doesn’t work are calculated to be one in 17 billion,” he told Sky News. “There’s no controversy over whether or not hydroxychloroquine works. The controversy is on the public health approach to COVID-19.” Mr McCullough said “the virus invades inside cells, so we have to use drugs that go inside the cell and work to reduce viral replication”. […]

(I disagree with the prof. on the political question. This drug wasn’t banned because president Trump said it worked, and was a potential game changer. The drug became blocked for public use because it DOES work and IS a game changer, and Donald Trump told everyone. It appears that there are many who do not want the game changed, and that is why it mysteriously became impossible to get everywhere all of a sudden.)