US Election Fraud post #28

As per usual, we are going to add about 10 items to this post, then start #29

1. Sidney Powell vows to expose…

(What does “release the Kraken” mean please?)

This appears to be the whole show:

2. Undersecretary of Defence, Frank Gaffney, details how this coup unfolded

3. US Army has raided German company with servers that illegally had US election data?

4. American Midwesterners open letter to President Trump

5. Another witness to fraud comes forward in Michigan.

6. Dr. Jeffress corrects the media lie on his parting ways with president Trump

Dr. Jeffress last night on Lou Dobbs

7. ALL DAY live coverage of the Million Man MAGA march

8. Rep. Gohmert update on the election tampering

9. Trump Motorcade


10. Thousands gather in DC for Trump


And its Saturday:


About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

27 Replies to “US Election Fraud post #28”

  1. SCYTL RAZZIA in Frankfurt? Die Verwicklung des spanischen Unternehmens Scytl in die US Wahlen


    Louie Gohmert enthüllt die Razzia eines Teams der US-Armee (CIA?) auf die Server-Einrichtung von Scytl in Frankfurt, Deutschland, um “äußerst überzeugende” Daten über die Wahlstimmenvertauschung wiederherzustellen.

    more on this page :



  2. 1. Release The Kraken Meaning. What Release The Kraken Means? What Does Sidney Powell Mean by Release The Kraken?
    by De Roka – November 14, 2020


    Release The Kraken phrase simply means revealing the dark truth, or revealing the big dark secret. Kraken is a legendary cephalopod-like sea monster of a gigantic size that terrorizes nearby sailors and believes to be strong and capable of destroying heavy and strong things like Boats and Ships. (Source: So, if someone saying they are going to Release The Kraken, then that means they are going to reveal some wrong-doing of someone which is making a huge impact.

  3. Lou Dobbs – It’s almost a full show. The last guest, Pastor Robert Jeffress:

    “Fighting for the First Amendment: @robertjeffress…”
    Lou Dobbs – November 13, 2020 – Twitter

    Earlier this week:

    “Don’t believe some false media reports that I have ‘broken’ with our great President @realDonaldTrump. I support him completely. We do NOT have a ‘president elect’ until electoral college votes December 14. I will discuss on ‘LouDobbs Tonight’ Friday.”
    Dr. Robert Jeffress – November 11, 2020 – Twitter

  4. Things are moving and the Dems are sweating bullets because of the movement. We have one month before the Electoral Collage meets to elect the President and things are going to break fast and furious over that month. President Trump is going to be reelected and a lot of Dems are going to go to the prison, this may well include a lot of the so called journalists from the corporate media that are willing participates in the conspiracy to stage a coup against the US Government.

  5. twitter @realDonaldTRump

    The Consent Decree signed by the Georgia Secretary of State, with the approval of Governor @BrianKempGA , at the urging of @staceyabrams, makes it impossible to check & match signatures on ballots and envelopes, etc.

    They knew they were going to cheat. Must expose real signatures!

    ….What are they trying to hide. They know, and so does everyone else. EXPOSE THE CRIME!


    The Georgia Recount May Be As Corrupt As The Election Itself

    On Friday morning, Georgia began to recount the votes it received on November 3. However, within a short time, reports came in that the recount process was being conducted with as little respect for transparency as the original vote count. Without that transparency, this recount is a waste of taxpayer time and money.

    Before getting to the problem with the recount itself, we need to be sure we’re all on the same page about what’s happening in Georgia, so some background is necessary. In my post about the two different types of election fraud, I explained that the first type of fraud goes to ballot legitimacy. That is, was the piece of paper that got fed into the counting machine from a duly registered voter? If not, that vote cannot be counted.

    We know from the affidavits flooding in from across the country that the Democrats used the Wuhan virus to justify mailing out millions of ballots to anyone on the voter registers, whether that person had since died, moved on, or lost interest in voting. Because voter rolls are chock-full of such voters, mass mailings meant that thousand, tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of ballots were floating around in mail-in states, free for anyone to grab and submit.

    Democrats made this fraud possible because they have steadily chipped away at other election legitimacy gatekeepers, such as identification checks and signature matches. In Democrat-run states, voting became as easy and as vulnerable to fraud as going to a shopping mall, filling out names on slips of paper, and sticking them in a big bucket for a promotional “drawing” for a bike or car. Or, even better, mailing hundreds of completed slips of paper to your buddy at the car dealer for him to put in the bucket. That’s how Democrat states ran their elections in 2020.

    So here’s what’s important to know about Georgia’s recount: the recount will do nothing to correct this first type of fraud. The process of vetting voters was wholly corrupt, and there is no way to disentangle the illegitimate from the legitimate ballots during the recount.

    The second type of fraud involves counting. Data-crunchers have produced powerful evidence that electronic voting machines in contested states were set to switch votes from Trump to Biden. Jay Valentine has an accessible rundown of that type of fraud here. What’s good about computer fraud is that, while it can be hidden on a small scale, on a large scale, it leaves unmistakable clues. (You can read more about these clues here and here.) There’s strong evidence that the same pro-Biden code that showed up in Michigan also affected votes in Georgia.

    In theory, while it won’t winnow out illegitimate ballots, a hand recount will at least prevent a repeat of the computer counting fraud. However, that works only if the humans doing the counting don’t cheat.

    The best way to prevent humans from cheating is to watch them. Indeed, those of you old enough to remember the Florida recount in 2000 will also remember that the media wandered freely through the counting rooms, getting close-ups of people carefully examining each ballot for those infamous hanging chads. Everyone understood that the point was to get it right.

    What happens, though, when the people in charge of the recount, in place of transparency, once again refuse to allow representatives of the parties to audit their work? What happens is this:

    One of our observers at the hand count of the ballots ordered by Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Does this inspire confidence?

    + video
    — David Shafer (@DavidShafer) November 13, 2020

    In a brief video that I can’t embed but that you can view here, Dick Morris explains that there is more going on than just barring Republicans from observing the vote. In addition, to the extent there are still available envelopes from the mailed in (absentee) ballots, secretary of state Brad Raffensperger stated that the counters would not attempt to match the signatures.

    The refusal to check signatures or otherwise try to validate mail-in ballots has created hugely anomalous rejection rates. Typically, Georgia rejects 3.5% of absentee ballots because they cannot be validated. This year, says Morris, the rejection rate is 0.002%. As Morris said, with nothing more, that discrepancy points to vast fraud.

    Not content with removing these fraud controls, Raffensberger also ordered the counties to finish the process by 3 P.M. on Saturday. Georgia received roughly 5 million votes. It’s ludicrous to believe they can properly be recounted in one and a half days. This isn’t a recount; it’s fraud theater.

    For more information about what’s going on in Georgia, including the Senate runoff, be sure to check out That site is all over Georgia’s election fraud.

  6. CNN: Conservatives joining Parler a ‘threat to democracy’
    By Howard Portnoy November 14, 2020

    One of these days, someone from the Left is going to need to explain what they think democracy means. They throw the term around a lot but almost always in contexts that suggest it has something to do with the exclusive betterment of the Democratic Party in America, which it clearly doesn’t.

    Take this exchange between CNN White House Correspondent Pamela Brown and anchor Brian Stelter concerning Parler, the social media platform launched in 2018. Wikipedia in its entry on Parler correctly identifies it as “an alternative to Twitter,” at least in the eyes of many of its users, and adds that it “is popular among people who have been banned from mainstream social networks or oppose their moderation policies.” The article goes off track when it states that “posts on the service often contain far-right content, antisemitism, and conspiracy theories” not so much because it doesn’t but because no parallel pejoratives appear in its entry for Twitter, which reveals Wikipedia’s own bias.

  7. Collins: Georgia Can’t Properly Certify Election Without Verifying Signatures
    November 14, 2020 Updated: November 14, 2020

    The head of the Trump campaign’s recount effort in Georgia said the Peach State will not be able to properly certify the results of the 2020 presidential election without verifying the voter signatures on absentee ballots and envelopes.

    “The hand count process in Georgia MUST include a review of signatures on absentee ballots and envelopes to verify whether the signature verification process was properly executed,” Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) wrote on Twitter on Saturday.

    “This is absolutely CRITICAL,” he added. “Without this, Georgia CANNOT properly certify the election results.”

    Georgia began a hand recount of the presidential election on Friday. The recount was ordered under a new state law, which requires the secretary of state to audit one race after the election. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger chose to audit the presidential race and said the tight margin meant a full hand count was necessary.

    • Brad figures they won’t sign the certification.
      Bribes by the PRC better be substantial. RINOs will be washed up. They better throw in a witness protection program, too.

  8. Wisconsin Voters File Lawsuit to Exclude Over 792,000 Votes in 3 Counties
    November 14, 2020 Updated: November 14, 2020

    Three voters in Wisconsin have filed a federal lawsuit seeking to exclude Nov. 3 election results in three of the state’s counties that helped push Joe Biden ahead of President Donald Trump. The action, if successful, would invalidate over 792,000 votes cast across the state.

    The civil action (pdf), filed on Thursday, alleges that there is “sufficient evidence that illegal votes were counted” in Milwaukee, Dane, and Menominee counties “to change or place in doubt the results” of the presidential election in the counties. The voters asked the court to declare that the counties’ results “must be invalidated” and to block the counties from certifying their results.

    All three counties lean heavily Democrat, with Milwaukee and Dane being among the most populous and heavily Democratic counties in the state. For the three counties, Biden holds a lead of 365,289 votes over Trump. In the state overall, Biden holds a lead of about 20,540 votes at 49.6 percent, compared to Trump at 48.9 percent as of Saturday. The Trump campaign has signaled it will request a recount.

  9. twitter @kylenabecker


    “It all goes to a server in Frankfurt, Germany, which is owned by a Barcelona, Spain multinational. And that’s who actually controls and reports your vote.”

    Election security expert @RussRamsland drops this bombshell just days *before* the election.

    + video


    28 STATES send election results to a remote server in Frankfurt, Germany, according to election security expert Russell Ramsland.

    The servers are based on SCYTL software, exposed by MIT Tech as having the ability to switch votes, “UNDETECTED.”

    Here’s how:



    Note: The practical solution to halt voter fraud is not federal control over electronic voting machines, but banning them outright.

    All paper ballots. Voter ID.

    No more mail-in ballots unless physically unable to show up on Election Day. Simple solutions that would work.

    • SCYTL
      Associated Press – JULY 2015 – Company prepares voting technology for US elections

      1. Wide of Catalonia Square, Barcelona

      2. Various of presentation of voting software for upcoming US presidential elections

      3. Mid of Pere Valles, CEO of Scytl, at podium

      4. SOUNDBITE (English) Pere Valles, CEO of Scytl:

      “It is a very thorough process to get certified. 2008, that was the first year we were certified, we were certified first by the state of Florida. It was a very long process obviously where they review your source code, they review your security measures that you implement to guarantee things like voter’s privacy or vote integrity, and that’s a very long and difficult process.”

      5. Various of software engineer Robert Bowen using new electronic vote software including screen shots of software

      6. SOUNDBITE (English) Robert Bowen, programmer at Scytl:
      “It’s very important to be able to vote from here, I’ve been doing it for the past ten years or so. It’s always been difficult and now it’s getting easier and with the system that we’ve developed, it’s quite easy.”

      7. Various of American citizen, Joshua Zamrycki in front of the US consulate in Barcelona

      8. Mid of sign reading (English) “Consulate General of the United States of America,” pull out to Zamrycki

      9. Close of mobile phone news story

      10. SOUNDBITE (English) Joshua Zamrycki, US citizen in Barcelona:
      “It’s very important to be able to have our voice heard, as American citizens living abroad to have our vote counted. We’re still citizens of the United States, still of our states, and to have our votes counted is important, we want our voice heard.”

      11. Wide of US consulate in Barcelona
      12. Mid of American flag

      An international software company headquartered in Barcelona, Spain, unveiled new electronic voting technology on Friday that will be implemented in time for the US presidential elections on November 6.

      The new electronic voting ballot developed by international technology company, Scytl, will allow American citizens from over 1,400 counties in 30 US states living abroad to vote for their candidates in the upcoming US elections.

      The software will enable electronic voting ballots to be sent to US citizens living abroad.
      Once the ballot is filled online it can be printed and sent to a US territory via traditional mail or email.

      “It’s very important to be able to have our voice heard, as American citizens living abroad to have our vote counted. We’re still citizens of the United States, still of our states, and to have our votes counted is important, we want our voice heard,” said one American resident of Barcelona.

      Scytl has developed secure electoral voting technology in France, Great Britain, South Africa, India and Australia.

  10. GOP Candidate Appeals Pennsylvania County Decision to Count Undated Mail-In Ballots
    By Zachary Stieber
    November 14, 2020 Updated: November 14, 2020

    A Republican state Senate candidate is appealing the decision by Allegheny County, Pennsylvania to count over 2,000 mail-in ballots with no date.

    Ziccarelli, 38, an attorney, filed a petition in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court to set aside the 2,349 ballots in question.

    The Allegheny County Board of Elections voted on Nov. 10 to count the ballots even though they had no date on them.

    “They applied on time, received their ballots, voted their ballots, returned them on time with their signature, their printed name, their address—the only thing they’re missing is their date,” County Solicitor Andrew Szefi told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. “They were received timely, and our … ballot sorting machine imprints a date received on each envelope as they’re scanned.”

    County officials said there would be a 48-hour period to appeal the vote and that they would put aside the ballots until an appeal was filed or the time period expired.

    Ziccarelli argued that the Election Code does not allow mail-in ballots to be counted unless they are signed and dated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *