12 Replies to “More Tucker from August 31 2020: Democrats spent months encouraging chaos, realize it may have been a mistake”
Perhaps it’s only semantics, but it wasn’t an anarchist who contrived the Long March, it was a communist. I think it’s important to label the enemy correctly. This way when we speak of the broader range of communist tactics, whether they be in the dialectic field or in the literal field, people understand the enemy essentially has but one real name and the common goal of insurgency. The only distinguishment that should be made it when the tards go openly kinetic. They are a different animal who desires ultimate supremecy over all.
China today is also a different animal: not your T-shirt Mao commie. The Han Chinese have racial supremacy sauce in their DNA. That’s apparent in this Xi creature, it’s in his propaganda.
Given time (about 50 to 70 years) the raw communism (Stalin or Mao) mutates into a neo feudal system. Look at China and then look at the Feudal system in Europe during the Dark ages, both had their Nobility, their Royals and each Nobel has their followers. There is then political infighting to decide who is the Royal at any given time.
So far no communist society has lasted long enough for their system to mutate into full Feudalism but Putin and the Oligarchs in Russia are moving in that direction. They moved to hereditary power but they are moving in that direction.
The question is will the CCP manage to survive any collapse and have some of them take power like what is happening in Russia. Given the way that Xi and the CCP are pissing off their neighbors this may not happen.
That’s about the same timeframe as the “Fourth turning”. Bannon talks about it a lot. Xi’s crushing competitors in the Politboro.~ the Cheese stands alone. ~
When dealing with societies and their decay and collapse it is hard to put an exact time on the collapse but if you study history you can get a general time frame and often by using several different metrics to measure the time.
Chaos can be reduced by prosecuting violent Antifa soyboys when they’re caught rather than releasing them on bail. This one was caught and cried for mommy:
Fox News collegues of Tucker’s were possibly monitored along with other conservatives. Is this not the inversion of what the left coined as McCathyism? Was this term not coined by the same counter-state that places contemporary conservatives under surveillance?
McCarthy was vilified and his reputation destroyed because he told the truth about the communist infiltration in our government. The current crop of communists are trying to use the same tactics to destroy all who oppose their goal of establishing a communist government and economy in North America. Despite all of the evidence they think they can make communism work when no one in recorded history has been able to.
Perhaps it’s only semantics, but it wasn’t an anarchist who contrived the Long March, it was a communist. I think it’s important to label the enemy correctly. This way when we speak of the broader range of communist tactics, whether they be in the dialectic field or in the literal field, people understand the enemy essentially has but one real name and the common goal of insurgency. The only distinguishment that should be made it when the tards go openly kinetic. They are a different animal who desires ultimate supremecy over all.
Well said.
_*\o/*_
China today is also a different animal: not your T-shirt Mao commie. The Han Chinese have racial supremacy sauce in their DNA. That’s apparent in this Xi creature, it’s in his propaganda.
Given time (about 50 to 70 years) the raw communism (Stalin or Mao) mutates into a neo feudal system. Look at China and then look at the Feudal system in Europe during the Dark ages, both had their Nobility, their Royals and each Nobel has their followers. There is then political infighting to decide who is the Royal at any given time.
So far no communist society has lasted long enough for their system to mutate into full Feudalism but Putin and the Oligarchs in Russia are moving in that direction. They moved to hereditary power but they are moving in that direction.
The question is will the CCP manage to survive any collapse and have some of them take power like what is happening in Russia. Given the way that Xi and the CCP are pissing off their neighbors this may not happen.
That’s about the same timeframe as the “Fourth turning”. Bannon talks about it a lot. Xi’s crushing competitors in the Politboro.
~ the Cheese stands alone. ~When dealing with societies and their decay and collapse it is hard to put an exact time on the collapse but if you study history you can get a general time frame and often by using several different metrics to measure the time.
Have you seen this? If not, you’re in for a treat.
A Middle East Primed for New Thinking
Insights and Policy Options from the Ancient World
https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/a-middle-east-primed/PDF/MidEastPrimedforNewThinking.pdf
Chaos can be reduced by prosecuting violent Antifa soyboys when they’re caught rather than releasing them on bail. This one was caught and cried for mommy:
https://www.wbay.com/2020/08/31/neenah-man-arrested-at-green-bay-protest-has-ties-to-antifa/
Yup prosecuting the punks in antifa will reduce the violence and remove a lot of the camouflage protecting the hard core leaders.
Fox News collegues of Tucker’s were possibly monitored along with other conservatives. Is this not the inversion of what the left coined as McCathyism? Was this term not coined by the same counter-state that places contemporary conservatives under surveillance?
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/state-department-release-memos-detailing-illegal-social
McCarthy was vilified and his reputation destroyed because he told the truth about the communist infiltration in our government. The current crop of communists are trying to use the same tactics to destroy all who oppose their goal of establishing a communist government and economy in North America. Despite all of the evidence they think they can make communism work when no one in recorded history has been able to.