This thread by a Johns Hopkins epidemiologist hints at an artificial and weaponized origin of Corona 3.0

15 Replies to “This thread by a Johns Hopkins epidemiologist hints at an artificial and weaponized origin of Corona 3.0”

1. “…four gene insertions…”

   Not by Mother Nature.

   • Who was the target they were aiming at.

     • Knowing the first cases showed up on December 01, and knowing the government organized a 25,000 citizen Wuhan celebration on January 22 or 23 without advising them to wear masks, it seems their intent was to spread the virus.

       What happened of consequence between Dec 01 and January 25?
       The USMCA deal that penalizes China economically. Also, the USA/China trade deal was passed. Trump winning and China losing, twice, a distinct loss of face for the CCCP.

       By the way, they didn’t expect the virus to be publicized so quickly. The CCCP media journal never mentioned people being sick until very recently.

       Had the citizens not had VPNs to communicate with the outside world, who knows?

       That’s all I can think of as a major event that impacts China.

       • Sorry but the date for the festival could be December 22 or 23?
         I would have to look it up. The Wuhan guy with VPN was very upset about it because the government didn’t provide masks and hadn’t revealed the seriousness of the virus. He showed photos-clips of the event.

         Let’s not forget the China Politburo doesn’t care about its people. So, it wouldn’t bother them if a number of their citizenry died. Remember the One Child Per Family Policy, they wanted to control population numbers. They reversed the Policy only because families were killing baby girls and there were way too many baby boys.

         And here: https://qz.com/1793764/china-court-says-wuhan-coronavirus-rumors-might-have-helped/

         • From what I have heard China has an excess of about 100 million men of combat age. There is a theory floating around that they were the target of the virus, remove some of the excess men and relieve some of tension that is gripping China. This theory sounds like tinfoil hat territory but at the same time sounds like something the CCP would do.

           You did a very good analysis of the facts and tied them together in a believable scenario. Now if the CCP will lose control and we both live long enough to see what the hidden records say happened.

           • Thank You Richard. Very appreciated.

             And Yes, you are right about too many young men of combat (and reproduction) age. The regime doesn’t want a Hong Kong revolt in the mainland.

             Did you see the drones targeting people in urban and rural settings who aren’t wearing masks? These drones are ordering them to go back home and stay there or to put on their masks. Extreme control over the population, scary.

             We’ll never know the true number of people sick/dying of the Virus because Test Kits and masks have been unavailable for at least five days.

             How is it that a super-manufacturing country is unable or unwilling to produce face masks in sufficient numbers? I’ve seen people boiling their face masks.

             I’ve also seen hospital staff in numbers not wearing masks. And I saw one video where a mask-wearing citizen lifts his mask and spits at the nurse’s face – this indicates citizen anger at an extreme level.

             And why would the Police barricade entire apartment buildings with wood planks and steel poles to prevent people from leaving?

             VLAD has one word: Samizdat.

             • First:

               And why would the Police barricade entire apartment buildings with wood planks and steel poles to prevent people from leaving?

               This is an ancient and brutal way of stopping epidemics/pandemics. It one person in a building is infected you stop everyone from leaving until all are dead or the plague has run its course. Once the occupants are either dead or have proved they aren’t sick you either burn the building or use some form of massive disinfectant to clean the building.

             • Second make that 300 million not 100 million.

               No we will never know the true number of sick or dead, Brad Johnson said add a zero behind the official number and that will come close. In this case if you are right and the virus was turned loose to reduce the Chinese population we may have to add 2 or more zeroes to get close to the real numbers.

             • Third: If you are right about the virus being used to reduce the population think about the desperation this shows!

               Using any type of disease to reduce the population is a risky proposition, you have to have some means to controlling either the spread of the illness or of controlling the population. In this case that would be the Military and the Police, the problem is do you have enough medical supplies, food etc to provide for the families of the Military and the police. These are the people you are depending on to remain safe and if you can’t protect their families they probably won’t protect you.

               For the CCP to take the risk of turning a nasty virus loose they have to be very worried about what the ordinary people pulling Hong Kong style protests/revolts in all major cities.

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE7Iz7HLpYg&feature=youtu.be

3. China Coronavirus: Global Emergency

4. I hear people say, “It only kills old people with compromised immune systems and pre-existing conditions so don’t worry”, I shudder. Hello… A nice little viral pneumonia that does not react to antibiotics could very well usher me into the next world so I really hope I don’t get the damn thing. Not being able to breathe is no fun…:(

5. IMO the reason for the HIV insertion is that it is so well studied and the effects of that part should be as well. BUT placing such a sequence in another virus does not mean that it will behave as it did when home. Playing with any natural virus is always potentially lethal.
   Many suspected that this virus was no accident while its release into the population may not have been by accident as well. In the latter case, if official. I would expect that all ranking ChiCom party members to have been immunized against it excepting the lower ranks as their sacrificial demise will be seen as proof that it was accidental. The one child policy may be reaping another harvest. I guess that if true this may be preferable to open war as there are a lot of angry young men in China with no chance of a wife let alone a family.

   • Addendum…..now the supposed evidence is being debated and denied. While virology is not my forte : ) I can agree with the author’s reasons for the scepticism BUT I have seen politics undermine science more than once in the past and I just wonder…that is all.

6. Epidemiologist twitter link gone.