About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

7 Replies to “Genocidal antisemitism, the new normal at Speaker’s Corner”

  1. British police and establishment supporting hate speech if it had been the other lot the rosa’s wouldve come down and beaten up those expose the wong think.

  2. Wonderful. To still have remaining in Marxist-Britian a place for free thought and free speech. Elsewhere, in the country they would have been arrested. The shame however, (as the returners ruefully commented), was that the people were not going there to listen but shout out ideological rhetorics.

    This clearly demonstated their low intelligences. This genetic infusion into the population that oligarch plantation-owners, these Corporate producers of white-guilt and white-hate narratives, want.

    When they left the field, the average IQ dropped from 100 to 90.

  3. Why do so many Jews like Chuck Schumer, George Soros, and Mark Zuckerberg push so hard for unlimited immigration of Jew-hating Muslims like this? What piece of the puzzle am I not being allowed to see? Can’t those Jews afford computers? Am I supposed to believe that they really don’t know what’s going on?

    • Chris, to answer that, despite what my mother told me, I actually have to answer that question with a question.

      Why do so many women work triple shifts to bring in woman-hating, raping, forced sex slave child-rape gang, muslim men who want to implement sharia with its less than equal rights for women?

      Why do so many white males join ANTIFA to work for the destruction of white people, culture and history as they (mis)represent it?

      Why do so many white Christian women become communists to try and undo every advantage women have won under free market and freedom of speech, cultures?

      Answer:

      It has nothing to do with women, men, white or Jewish. It has to do with communism.

      My reverse ask is, ‘why is it only when its Jewish people that we notice?

      I think there is a somewhat fair answer to that one, though.

      Jews who turn commie use their Judaism or more accurately, their Jewish heritage/ethnicity as a sword and a shield to promote the thing they actually care about, which is their politics.

      So they expect other people to notice. What they are in fact doing, is exploiting the suffering of Jewish people under the communists and Nazis and every other pogrom throughout history in order to protect themselves as individuals from the consequences of their repugnant beliefs. Hence the shield aspect. They will cry antisemitism when you oppose them for the thing they actually use as a sword, which again, is their heritage.

      So its not altogether surprising that people notice Jewish people when they go commie as they make damn sure you do.

      Last summer I went out to speak with an orthodox rabbi from the Lubavitcher sect.

      Unmistakably orthodox Jew.

      After talking for a bit we got to brass tacks. The impression I get is, actual religious Jewish people are conservative, pro freedom of speech, and this one was even pro-Trump and not unintelligently so. His reasons were grounded solidly in fact and policy.

      But his real ambition and passion was his faith.

      I have had other conversations with Jewish people on this and there is an inverse relationship between degree of adherence to the faith and irrational values, perhaps ironically for those who think religion encourages irrational thought.

      It is the atheist/secular/reform Jews who are communist/socialist/postmodern overall. In fact there are umbrella Reform Temple organizations which are fill on communist, exactly like there are many Churches like that. The Unitarian, several others in Ottawa Canada that I have attended for one reason or another, and increasingly the Catholic church.

      Few if any ever ask why so many Christians work to bring in anti-Christian muslims, like I dunno, Pope Francis for example. But we really notice when its a few Jews.

      So I guess the answer is that its a function of perception, both fairly in terms of the agents who force that upon us, and unfairly because reason and facts show that it has bugger all to do with Jews. Just that some Jews are despicable like some everything else.

      • Jews who turn commie use their Judaism or more accurately, their Jewish heritage/ethnicity as a sword and a shield to promote the thing they actually care about, which is their politics.

        So they expect other people to notice. What they are in fact doing, is exploiting the suffering of Jewish people under the communists and Nazis and every other pogrom throughout history in order to protect themselves as individuals from the consequences of their repugnant beliefs. Hence the shield aspect. They will cry antisemitism when you oppose them for the thing they actually use as a sword, which again, is their heritage.

        PREFACE: This is very commendable of you, Eeyore. Every indication shows Chris Jones to be in earnest and his oft-asked question is of undeniable cogency. The detail of your answer is rarely seen due to this topic’s explosiveness and how frequently even your meritous train of thought is taken straight off the rails by rabid Antisemites—just like the clip’s opener or frothy closer.

        The obscene allure of Antisemitism (and its inseparably-fused, conjoined twin, Genocide) is only compounded by the strong possibility put forth by one of the only other (non-exclusive) hypotheses I’ve encountered.

        To wit: The timeless and prehistoric (i.e., nobody can argue that its origin is strictly Jewish) strategy of Divide and Conquer may be genetically engineered into people of the Twelve Tribes at levels far deeper than the most advanced scientific techniques currently achieve.

        Many Jew haters regularly cite Ashkenazic breeding for intelligence as the root of some otherworldly cunning. This, even as they conspicuously ignore the distinct possibility that centuries of predatory and brutal discrimination, Blood Libels, pogroms, and ghettoization might of (for better or worse) ended up culling slower-witted European Jews.

        Ironically, this combination of voluntary (e.g., matriliny) and forcibly streamlined genealogical permutation only served to further compound age-old Antisemitic superstitions and their apocryphal train of Elderly Zionist baggage.

        Judaism’s customary literacy and freedom of religious dispute further factor into this already convoluted equation. These empowering Judaic traditions materialized before the eyes of less-lettered (pre-industrial) European commoners as specters of religiously condemned heresy and diabolical collusion.

        Much like how the incredible violin virtuoso Nicolo Paganini was suspected selling his soul to the devil, so have Jews had to contend with similar doubts that were only stoked by a sanctimonious Vatican.

        Lobbing in grenades of clannish mutual support, mercantile ability and status, frequent bilingualism, lends not-so-delicate top notes to this roiling stew of hate.

        For a grand finale, lingering in the background, there’s always the highly suspect yet hesitation-inducing aspect of deep Jewish connections within the Old Testament. What better way to increase the already lethal turmoil?

        This Divide and Conquer corollary is introduced, not as proof, but food for thought. The obvious Leftist-Jew-Commie tryptic—acid-etched by Marx and his endless retinue of utopist confrères—with its hyper-miscible sidecar of Biblical spirits, makes for a potent font of speculation, be it useful or counterproductive.

        CODA: That this bias so profoundly appeals to self-proclaimed neo-Nazis who are, just as often, ostensible specimens of humanity that Hitler would have railroaded straight to ovens (even before the Jews) is hilariously ironic grist for its own polemic rant.

  4. Maybe because, as I just read somewhere, Schumer is Jewish like Pelosi is Catholic–both have abandoned their faiths. (Hard to believe someone could stray so far away from their common sense, faith or no faith, but there it is.)

    This also supports the concept quite commonly held, at least in parts of central Europe, that religion is not a race but rather a moniker one only chooses to wear.