Important warning video to Jews REMOVED by Youtube and community guidelines strike given

This is patently crazy. Here is the video that Youtube just removed because they claim it violates their community standards but does not say how, other than some vague general terms that could apply to a video of driving in the country.

Here is the text of Youtube’s email when they yanked it down:

Hi Vlad Tepesblog,

As you may know, our Community Guidelines describe which content we allow – and don’t allow – on YouTube. Your video “Malmo Sweden Muslims chant death to Jews Dec 8 2017” was flagged for review. Upon review, we’ve determined that it violates our guidelines. We’ve removed it from YouTube and assigned a Community Guidelines strike, or temporary penalty, to your account.

Video content restrictions

If a video contains violent or graphic content that appears to be posted in a shocking, sensational, or disrespectful manner, it’s less likely to be allowed on YouTube. We also don’t allow content that’s intended to incite violence or encourage dangerous activities. We review content on a case by case basis and will only make limited exceptions for appropriate educational, documentary, artistic, and scientific contexts, where the purpose of posting is clear.

In light of this, we ask that uploaders post as much information as possible in the title and description of their video to help us and viewers understand the primary purpose of the video. Please note, even with this additional context, it’s still not acceptable to post violent or gory content that’s primarily intended to be shocking, sensational, or disrespectful and this type of content is prohibited on YouTube. Learn more here.

The impact of strikes

This is the first strike applied to your account. We understand that users seldom intend to violate our policies. That’s why strikes don’t last forever – this strike will expire in three months. However, it’s important to remember that additional strikes could prevent you from posting content to YouTube or even lead to your account being terminated.

How you can respond

If you believe this was a mistake, we’d like to hear from you. Please follow both of these steps as simply deleting the video won’t resolve the strike on your account.

  • The next time you sign in you will be asked to acknowledge this strike on your account.
  • If you would like to appeal this strike, please submit this form. Our team will thoroughly review your appeal and will contact you again very soon.

Sincerely,
– The YouTube Team

Here is the text of my appeal:

If this was Nazis threatening Jews it would be a public service. But its Muslims threatening genocide of Jews in Sweden. It MUST be seen. Your strike is denying critical info to a vulnerable minority

It is condensed because Youtube allows very few characters for appeals.

Watch the video and decide for yourselves if it violates community standards. Even on its own, and not even in comparison to the hundreds of thousands of grotesque and hate filled rants of nazis and muslims that Youtube is peppered with.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

11 Replies to “Important warning video to Jews REMOVED by Youtube and community guidelines strike given”

    • You have a point. This might be mistakenly seen in a poor light, instead of a celebration of Equal Religious, Cultural and Political Values.

      “If this were Jews threatening Nazis it would be a public service. But it’s Jews threatening Muslims with genocide in Sweden. It MUST be seen. Your strike is denying critical info to a vulnerable minority responding to the ongoing Global Conspiracy.”

      That should fix it.

    • No he does not “live on”. nazism is a direct descendant of islam and hitler was muhammad reincarnated, to all intents and purposes, even to the extent of having Nazism turning into a religion with adolf as its prophet(as did islam) so that those who die over that last 10ms all go to nazi heaven with 72 volkdeutsch houris(well under way by 1944 thanks to treuer Heinrich.
      communism and nazism are BOTH illegitimate, bastard (forgive the tautology) children of islam with a sprinkling of marxian mysticism to appeal to the idiot idealists and the brain dead.

      • The bluprint is the same. Weak before the strong, strong before the weak.

        “Adolf was the older brother and father figure. He was very strict with Paula and slapped her around. But she justified it in a starry-eyed way, because she believed it was for the good of her education.”

        The two historians have also located a joint memoir by Hitler’s half-brother, Alois, and half-sister, Angela.

        One excerpt describes the violence exercised by Hitler’s father, also called Alois, and how Adolf’s mother tried to protect her son from regular beatings.

        “Fearing that the father could no longer control himself in his unbridled rage, she [Adolf’s mother] decides to put an end to the beating.”

        https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/aug/04/research.secondworldwar

        • The bullied become the bully (re-lived fear that if they don’t strike first, they will be attacked again and again).

          This perpetual coward, invents a gilded prison for their protagonist of either parent, the gods that failed them.

          Communism has the Trojan Horse of Feminizm. To get all the independent hussies out into the open before they are shot and what’s left become clones of the Workers Party. Out of the home.

          Muhammadism has the Trojan Horse of the superior men, who are then turned into criminal foot-soldier for the gang. Out of the home.

          Useful youngest-sibbling apologists who go-with-the-flow, are welcomed everywhere.

  1. Sure. I’ll buy that, Michelle. I wanted to connect the two because I couldn’t find an adequate way to express my outrage over this video. That these jihadis can chant such vile bile in any western country, with neither arrest nor vigilante retribution signals only dhimmitude. But this leads me to another concerning point.

    At a Christmas party this year I met an old friend. Lovely Jewish woman. Pretty and very intelligent. I hadn’t had the luck to have a meaningful conversation with her in a long time. As the years have passed she seems to have embraced her Jewishness more strongly, which I think is not unusual. She was always moderate. I remember her saying long ago that her problem was she always saw both sides of an arguement. We talked about our kids and the kind heart of our hostess.

    Where had the time gone, I wondered as we spoke, and what was her attitude towards all that had emerged in the last 25 years–in these years since our last real chat? Was she still a moderate despite the Redgreen revolution? –Despite all of the information that had become available to us?

    I don’t recall there being music, but our words did the sort of careful waltz that considerate people do when they truly don’t want to step on their dance partner’s toes. To be fair, this delicate dance is not just for the considerate in our day, but for the sake of successful doublethink. It’s tough, though. Impatience and curiosity always gets the better of me. I can’t go long before wanting to “dip” my partner. Otherwise what’s the point? I don’t recall if it was I who led with my right foot or she with her left (our host was sweet enough to mix me a muscular rum-and-something because my dear wife was playing taxi, so exact choreography into our plunge is foggy). She works for a Jewish community organization, to boot, so the degree of her red-pilledness would be more salient. Bright, open, informed and involved, was she not the proverbial canary?

    “…your job really is where the rubber meets the road, by sounds of it,” I said. “…you meet every part of society, don’t you….” This was a lob ball and she went right for it.

    “…we try to build bridges…try to make connections in the community…” she said.

    I’m pretty sure we both understood where the bridges began and ended, since bridge building to Catholics and Buddhists was not front page news these days. The earnest way she said this made me think she didn’t know about the stealth jihad of interfaith dialogue, or the taqiyya involved.

    “…one of the blogs I read has many conservative Jewish voices. They’d say this is a mug’s game. That you’re being manipulated….” Maybe I used the word “sucker”.

    “I don’t see it this way.” I’d stepped on her toe.

    “…these are people who like Bibi…”

    “Well, he’s not doing anyone any favours right now….”

    It didn’t take long at all before we chose to switch to a jive. After all it was Christmas and the air was light. I was happy to leave it at that. But all those years and, well, I’ll leave it at that.

    Except. Two times I’ve had the opportunity to speak to a professional economist. Questioning their Keynesian orthodoxy is very dangerous. I find this remarkable and absurd given the late hour of our terminal debt and reserve currency regime. Both times the response was to be offended. To be Austrian is to be Neanderthal. But who should know better than a Keynesian in matters of money?

    My old friend had too much class and kindness to react this way, but I stand by my Keynesian economist/Jewish metaphor.

    Not to mix things up, but there’s a forest in them thar trees, dear.

    • Great writing as usual, Johnnyu.

      To be fair, this delicate dance is not just for the considerate in our day, but for the sake of successful doublethink.

      For all of his gaffes and blunders, I think Trump has demonstrated beyond all doubt that a little indelicacy can go a long ways nowadays.

      This cartwheeling epidemic of Doublethink is vectored by something far more insidious than propinquitous blandishments. Without prior conditioning, no healthy human mind can thoroughly embrace these levels of duality. Absent intensive preparatory training, the psychological rigors involved can produce very harmful dissociative personality fragmentation.

      Only one regimen adequately braces an individual for such self-held diametric contradictions. Stifling ever more strident complaints lodged by one’s own internal dialogue requires a steely will backed with an unalloyed rod forged in the furnace of inner adversity.

      No other armor is wrought with the volcanic heat and rigorous tempering needed to effortlessly deflect so many dire threats. Not another shield made protects New Believers with such adamantine impenetrability.

      There is but one igniting spark with the sustained heat needed to inflame their imaginations and do so without involving any detectable contamination by rationality…

      I give you, COGNITIVE DISSONANCE!

      Protector of the weak (minded), Defender of The Narrative™, Champion of Truthiness, and Keeper of the Flame which (selectively) enforces the legal right of all humorless türds everywhere to never, ever be offended, or even put at risk of being offended, for the remainder of their earthly existence.

  2. “Community Standards”?? If I posted a video in Germany in 1938 warning that those who followed Hitler would cause the deaths of millions and untold destruction and misery upon the German people, when the Nazi Party faithful mobbed Youtube to complain, the video would have been banned because it “violated community standards”.

    This is mob rule pure and simple, And a progressive mob to be more specific. It is obvious that Youtube staffers are members of the mob.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*