About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

12 Replies to “Diversity in Saville”

  1. Give Britain another 30 years, and it will be over. Even now, it’s pretty much past the tipping point. Only a Civil War can bring it back but most Brits are cowards. They should never have moved out of Saville.

    • Starting a Civil War is a much bigger step then you are thinking, it took 10 years for the American Revolution to start and even then there were questions on how far they should go. There are signs that Britain, France and Germany are close to the point when it is either fight or run and most of the Brits don’t have money enough to run, or some place that they could run to that isn’t close to the problems in Britain. Which ever choice they make in the end the nations that manage to stay free from the Islamic Conquest will be forced to invade and liberate the conquered nations, they will have to do this to remove the infection from close proximity to their free nations. This is why the coming war/s will last many decades and why most European nations will end up with strong man rule.

      Right now we are concentrating on keeping our nations free but in the long run we will be forced to insist that our neighboring nations be free of the Islamic infection.

    • “They should never have moved out of Saville.”
      21 years ago we moved out of Orange County CA because of the invasion of illegal Hispanics. The school system had collapsed, one third of the children in my oldest son’s class did not speak English. The High School was closed for a month due to a TB outbreak, the parks were filthy, the library had a leek in the roof that the city didn’t have the funds to repair and all their computers were broken. The police spent their time combating gangs and home invasion robbery.
      So yes, we moved.
      Unless you have lived in a community that is rapidly deteriorating and in which you don’t think you will be able to educate your children or provide for their safety, I would say those comments are inappropriate.

    • Adveriser sell products. Guilt-buying, envy-buying, shame-buying. Buying into the narrative to belong, to hold a product that virtual-signals your solidarity or your feigned inclusion to the hostile herd.

      It starts off with an ‘undeniable fact.’ An outrageous vulgar insult to your system. And then it tells you the correct way about how you will then deal with it.

      Potato chips were sold exactly this way with the approval of single moms and two daddies. “When it comes to families, what’s normal?”

      When it comes to being forced to wear the burka, at-the-end-of-the-day let out your vagina because this is all there is, to be the real you.

      Like the damaged family, the damaged woman is reinforced.

      You are only brave and strong in your head.

      (Sex references inter-shot split seconds at 0.15 minutes).

      Don’t underestimate controlling messages to our reptilian and mammalian brains.

      • Demoralization is the path to dhimmitude, socialism and sexsquirrelity. Their superior-rulers are Muhammad and his Imams, Communist Parties, and X-Men.

    • An Israeli firm, created a bit of a scandal. They’re likely to pull the ad. Elsewhere they’d probably be lashed and jailed, if they weren’t torn to pieces by a rabid mob.

  2. It’s actually Savile (one L) near Dewsbury.

    On 30 April 2007 Leo McKinstry warned:

    We cannot sit back and let Sharia law take root in Britain
    The wail of the mosque is signalling the end of traditional British justice.??
    For centuries, the principle of equality before the law for all citizens has been at the heart of our society.
    It has been one of the cornerstones of our liberty, stretching back to the time of Magna Carta.?Now, thanks to the pernicious doctrine of multi-­culturalism, it is under attack as never before.
    In a political climate of craven appeasement towards Muslim extremism, the Islamification of our country is steadily accelerating.?Across large swathes of urban Britain, Muslim practices, customs, schooling and dress-codes now prevail. But perhaps the most dramatic indicator of this process comes from the West Yorkshire town of Dewsbury, where Muslim elders have decided to set up their own Islamic court to impose Sharia law in civil disputes within their communities.
    The misguided creed of anti-racist tolerance could herald a dark new era of judicial intolerance
    Crucial issues such as divorce and child custody are settled by a panel of four senior Muslim clerics and scholars.?The age-old British attachment to trial by jury or by magistrates is at risk from an utterly alien Islamic code imported from regions far less civilised and democratic than our own.?
    Effectively, the integ­rity of British law has been eclipsed in parts of Dewsbury by quasi-judicial religious zealotry.?In this once proud Yorkshire mill town, there are now two legal systems in operation for civil matters, one for Muslims and one for the rest of the population.?This is a recipe for more division in a place already notorious for its links to fanatical Islam. Dewsbury was, after all, the home town of Mohammed Siddique Khan, the leader of the July 7 suicide bombers.
    The establishment of Sharia law will only increase the trend towards Muslim separatism.?The Government is partly to blame as its enthusiastic promotion of the dogma of cultural diversity has encouraged ethnic minority groups to cling to their own traditions rather than embrace Britain’s.?But the self-styled community leaders of Dewsbury are also displaying a repellent arrogance towards British law, which they seem to believe is inferior to their own code.
    Well, if they really think Sharia law is better than our own, why don’t they go and live in some brutal theocracy such as Saudi Arabia rather than trying to destroy the judicial fabric of Britain??It is sickening that they want to have it both ways:?enjoying the fruits of our prosperous society while demanding that their superstitious, barbaric, mis­ogynistic ideology be given official legal status.
    Indeed, it is this misogyny that is perhaps the most sinister aspect of the arrival of Sharia law in Britain.?For the Islamic code enshrines the institutional oppression of women, treating them as second-class citizens.?A wife mistreated or beaten by her spouse is hardly likely to receive much justice from the bearded patriarchs of an Islamic court, for whom anti-female discrimination is part of their theology.?
    It is telling that when there was a proposal to introduce Sharia law for Muslims in Ontario, Canada, the most vociferous opposition came from female Muslim immigrants who had fled from states such as Iran.?“I came here to escape Sharia law,” said one Iranian exile. “Under it, a woman is worth half a man.?She has no rights.”
    Thankfully, even in politically correct Canada, the proposition was quashed.?But Britain under Blair is less robust.?For the Sharia court in Dewsbury will not be an isolated case. With our Government too enfeebled to challenge it, the idea will spread.?Other Muslim neighbourhoods will start to impose Islamic rules.?And the scope of the Sharia judges will be expanded far beyond mere matrimonial and child custody disputes. This could be just the first step towards the creation of localised Taliban regimes in Muslim areas of British cities, enforcing their own distorted moral codes, clamping down on alcohol, imposing new forms of censorship, promoting anti-western attitudes and peddling yet more grievances against the British state.
    Lurking in the background is the threat of terrorism if demands for special treatment are not met.?MJ Akbar, a Muslim scholar, recently made this menacing comment on any attempt to resist Sharia law: “A Muslim does not have to live in a Muslim state but he must have the right to live by his divine law.?If that is denied then he is in Dar al Harb or the House of War and jihad becomes obligatory upon him.”
    Muslims continually bleat about so-called “Islamophobia” but the isolation they experience from mainstream society is of their own making.?British society has bent over backwards to accommodate Islam. We now have state-funded Muslim schools and Muslim-friendly mortgages. Mosques have been erected across Britain while, unlike in France, the hijab headscarf is allowed in schools.
    Only last week, the Govern­ment announced that it is planning to introduce Islamic-compliant security bonds in the City.?But none of this is ever good enough.?The more we fall to our knees, the more emboldened radical Muslims become. That is because we have made the grievous error of thinking that Islam is another religion, like Christianity or Buddhism, based on the individual relationship between the believer and God.?In reality Islam, certainly in its modern manifestation, is as much an aggressive political ideology as a faith.?The religious and the political realms are merged under Islam, which prescribes a mode of governance for society.
    That is why Muslim states are so authoritarian.?And it is also why the advent of Sharia law in Britain is so terrifying.?It will bring about the end of liberal democracy unless it is stopped.?
    The misguided creed of anti-racist tolerance could herald a dark new era of judicial intolerance.

    • “MJ Akbar, a Muslim scholar, recently made this menacing comment on any attempt to resist Sharia law: “A Muslim does not have to live in a Muslim state but he must have the right to live by his divine law. If that is denied then he is in Dar al Harb or the House of War and jihad becomes obligatory upon him.”

      Take the Blue: Just open your vagina and this will all go away.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *