Twice now I have read news from the UK on how a school board has banned pork or pig products from meals served at public schools – something which should not be happening in the first place – and is trying to spread the blame for this on Jewish students as well as on muslims. In today’s story, the claim is that “it’s too expensive to monitor the diets of Islamic and Jewish pupils.”
In fact, there is no prohibition in Jewish law from handling or serving pork or pork products. Many Jewish people, in fact, have pig hearts and stomach parts surgically implanted as treatment for disease, as do many other patients preferring an organ from an animal over an artificial or synthetic one. Jews simply cannot eat pig meat. They have no objection to being near pigs or having any other relationship with them such as pets. Add to that, Jews have been in England for centuries and all the while never required these sorts of changes in public eateries for non-muslims, changes that we see only muslims requiring from non-muslims and only since the number of non-muslims within the UK have risen.
It’s pretty much a guarantee that it’s only muslim students and their families who have an issue with being near pork or with allowing non-muslims to make their own choices that are in defiance of islamic sensitivities. So clearly then, the idea of including Jews in the excuse to ban all pork products is a kind of ‘hate-sync’ or ‘blame-sync’ in much the same way as a computer uses a piece of metal as a heat-sync to get heat away, which it generates itself, from a sensitive part. This is done to soften the inevitable and well-justified vitriolic reaction to muslims who certainly caused it, so that they can say: ‘This isn’t just muslims!’
One has to wonder how a government agency can make a policy more cynical than this one. Clearly it knows that there is no future for Jews in Europe, thanks to unlimited and irrational islamic immigration. And so it cannot matter what is true, fair or just or what kind of problems will result from a calculated lie that protects the guilty at the expense of the most vulnerable segment of the population. Pre-teenage girls raped by hundreds of thousands, by muslim gangs that are often protected by muslims within the establishment, notwithstanding of course.
Eeyore for VladTepesBlog with thanks to CB. Sashenka
Not only do Jews not have a future in Europe unless they are willing to fight for their culture and nation there is no future for Europeans in Europe.
Excellent point Richard. I deeply hope that Europeans read that. Because maybe then they will fight back.
Not only the Europeans, the same applies to us in North America if we don’t start fighting for our culture, religion and nations. We are in a war of survival that we must win if freedom is to survive, the barbarians aren’t at the gate they are inside the cities, towns and villages. Your comment in a following post about this being the first true world war where no place will not be affected and will probably see some form of combat, usually small unit asymmetric war attacks. Before the war is over the anti-weapon laws will be removed from the books so the small towns can defend themselves from the leftist and Moslem attackers. It will take several massacres before the common sense approach of self defense is allowed to take over but it is coming.
Quicker in the States then in Canada and Europe, the latest Supreme Court rulings on the Second Amendment are moving to say it means no weapons control laws.
See link to Sharansky below.
He is another person who thinks that civilization itself is in danger, I am glad that I am not the only one seeing that potential future for the world.
strict interpretation of Jewish law is very simple, a Jew can not deny a non-Jew food of their choosing, in fact, an orthodox Jew should be happy to cook you a bacon sandwich. There is one exception mixing milk and meat, which Jews are just not allowed to do, even for dog food, we can give you the hamburger, and you can put the slice of cheese on it yourself if you like.
There are no other interpretations here, a practising Jew would have no intention of having pork banned in a secular school, Jewish kids are brought up to understand what they can eat, and the responsibility is theirs alone, I understand Hindu kids who have similarly strict dietary laws have the same attitude. This would be a typical response if you ask a rabbi.
http://ohr.edu/ask_db/ask_main.php/112/Q1/
Here is an explanation in honor of Valentine’s Day.
The Jewish people said to God, “I love you so much, I’m going to give up one of my favorite foods to show my love. From now on, I am through with eating bacon with my eggs!” “Wow!” says God. “You must really feel a connection to me.”
“Ohhhh, Big ‘G'” says the neighbor across the street. “I also love you soooo much — I’m also going to stop eating bacon with my eggs.”
To this the Jewish people say, “The umpire in the great baseball game of faith says you are out! We were here first, and that’s the sacrifice that our taste buds are making, and quit muscling in on our main squeeze. (If you really want to show your love, maybe give up wine?)”
I love Victor Sharansky’s response when he’s in Europe and asked: ‘Is there a future for Jews in Europe?’
He replies: ‘I’m wondering if there’s a future for Europeans in Europe.’
Here’s an interview with him just after the massacres in Paris:
Paris massacre shows time running out for Europe
http://www.timesofisrael.com/sharansky-paris-massacre-shows-time-running-out-for-europe/
Everyone who works or volunteers for the Agency is real sick of the meme:
~~ “Do Jews have a future in…?” ~~
As just another idle babble bubble.
Either roll up your sleeves, or save the pity for the Yazidis. Or the Christians you watched being massacred.