How close are Nazism, communism and Islam? Why does the far left support fascist Islam?

If any readers of this site has not yet seen the excellent and important movie, ‘The Soviet Story’, they would do well to do so. The movie makes the point that the differences between communism, international socialism, and Nazism, National Socialism, are quite subtle. One might even say somewhat like the difference between Shiia and Sunni Islam.

For example, the movie makes the case that Nazism was based on bad biology. Specifically that in the effort to create the new man, the perfected man, one had to take those who were already the perfected people and purify the territory. Namely Aryans of course. And once the homeland of the Aryans was pure they could start forcing those who could be perfected, the British and whatnot, and then exterminate all who could not be made into the perfect man.

This was the Nazi ideology. It could be seen in everything they did but one of the more telling, and yet goofy, analogies was their pseudo-science of ‘phrenology‘.

Like most people or groups that use top down thought, or perhaps better expressed as conclusion driven thinking, the Nazis employed any method or data points that could demonstrate their position while not only ignoring but actually making illegal and exterminating those who did real science that might show a conclusion in opposition to established Nazi dogma.

Communism or International Socialism uses a slight variant on that.

for example Communism also would eliminate or force into reeducation camps any science that did not support their conclusion based reasoning. For example, most people do not know that communism did not allow Darwinism to be taught or studied and all biology had to be based on their own communist evolutionary ideas, who’s survival of the fittest seemed far to capitalist in nature for International Socialism, a fellow named Lysenko and his crypto-science called Lysenkoism’.

The communist idea was based on bad sociology. that there is three social classes. The perfect, ‘new man’ or the communist. Those who could be perfected into communists, which would be the capitalists, and those who could never be perfected because they had not even reached the stage of capitalism yet, and therefore had to be exterminated.

On this the Nazis and Communists were in full agreement. At least in terms of the Slavic peoples.

Then we have the Muslims.

They see the world in terms of three tiered religious thought. The perfect people, the muslims, who can do no actual wrong so long as their belief in islam and its dogma is demonstrably strong and they obey the ‘pirate’s code’ of sharia etc. Then you have those that can be perfected into muslims such as Christians and Jews as they are already more or less monotheistic from the point of view of Muslims and therefore are readily accepted into the islamic community if they convert before they have no choice. Sometimes even if they convert under pure torture or threat of death.

And then you have atheists, Hindus, Buddhists and other religious groups such as African animists or Amer-indians etc. These groups will likely be seen as not having reached mono-theism yet and therefore ripe for extermination. Just have a look at General Tamerlane’s expeditions into India for a sample of how muslims treated the Hindu’s which resulted in what is the largest genocide that has ever taken place in recorded history.

This isn’t to say that Muslims will not exploit divisions in our own societies using groups that have not ‘reached monotheism’ to advance their own supremacy. We saw this clearly in Ferguson where muslim agitators used classic islamic style chants to increase division between white and black Americans during a period of horrific instability there. But at the end of the day, one needs only look at Islamic history and even contemporary Islamic societies and use of African people as slaves to know how this will end for them.

Slavery or extermination. Probably a good deal of both.

Graphic below by Nicolai Sennels:

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

27 Replies to “How close are Nazism, communism and Islam? Why does the far left support fascist Islam?”

  1. I need more time to think about this, but first a dumb question: What’s the difference between “communism” and “international socialism” as you use it here? Is “international socialism” diffferent from “socialism”?

    • Communism is international socialism. Nazism was National Socialism.

      Watch the video. Its very good.

      • I watched twice. And I’ll watch again.

        I’ve got the Nazi “national socialism” part. That’s just a lie. It was supra-national totalitarianism. And the Stalin-Hitler. Like Islam’s Khalifah-Umma.

        But these differences of word order are subtle and I get confused. It is important, I’m just trying to pin concepts to context correctly. Slowly.

        ~ Internationale ~ That’s communism. [The F-word.]
        But didn’t the unions use the “international” bit a lot? Like the IWW? Would you call them “international socialists” as a euphemism for – heaven forbid – communists? [Call someone the latter, you’d best carry a weapon. Better-dead/ Than-red.]

        Then in today’s usage, right here: “socialism” is “communism-lite”? Brussels elites are limousine-liberals until they come after you with a tank.

        Forgive the shaggy thinking, if you can. Don’t worry though, time usually sorts things out.

        • The table helps.

          Then we’re not talking about Socialism as a 4th -ism at all. It’s the proper noun or corporate name for Nazi-ism: National Socialism.

          Is that right so far?

        • When to parties try to merge and be one party as the Nazi’s and the Communists tried to do in 1925 it means they have a lot of similarities.

        • You are close to the truth, Socialism is the word the Marxist use to introduce their policies gradually (like in Britain) and get people use to big government slowly before they take them full communist.

          The only difference between International socialism and national socialism is the inter before national, granted Fascism allows the ownership of private property but it controls it so tightly with regulations that you don’t really control what you own.

        • OX AO the fascist split off from the communist to make a Marxism that works, at least that is what they claimed.

  2. I’d like to suggest people read Jamie Glazov’s excellent ‘United In Hate’, which answers all these questions and more…

    • “United In Hate” is something like the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
      Similar to the relationship the US had with Russia during WWII.

      That type of relationship only goes so far. It is much deeper then that.
      Socialism and Islamic theocracy are fundamentally very similar ideologies as I pointed out in my last post.

      • The book has got nothing to do with ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’. I don’t know where you got that from. If you read it, as I suggest, you’d know that.

  3. Socialism is communism. People in Canada tend to think its something different and in a way we have made it something different. But for the context of this article, socialism is another word for communism. The Nazis and the Soviets were different kinds of communists who both referred to themselves as ‘socialists’.

    • My mistake was to take your second sentence as four rather than two systems of social organization [control]. Islam makes three (setting aside sectarian variants for the moment).

      Now I’m getting it: Communism (plus precursor useful idiot-socialism), Nazism (sui generes, but fascist order), and Islam (Nazi, fascist, made operative via socialism => communism).

  4. Also check out this lecture by a scientist about the politicization of science. Its initially about global warming but he covers Lysenko in this lecture as well.

  5. Nazi Germany had no Sexual Freedom or Freedom to marry who one loves, due to Miscegenation laws. Two more No’s.

    • They also had the free love movement where Blond Aryan boys and girls were encouraged to have as many kids as she could, preferably by different fathers to spread the gene pool.

  6. Three Socialists:
    Follow the Prophet behind One.
    Follow the Messiah in front of Many.
    Follow your imprint for Pity Sex.

    And never suffer again.

    Or find the way to the pain of realization that nothing has it.

    Otherwise someone else will instruct you when to celebrate a sacred month and be happified, and hate the noble who cast an honest light upon you.

  7. Why socialists side with Islam has been puzzling myself as well. I believe it is a case of who is their biggest enemy.

    Look at the Jewish people they always sided with Islam throughout their history from the first crusades to the invasion of the Iberian Peninsula.
    Jewish people have always sided with the collectives view (the fundamentals of Socialism is the collectivists view.)

    I view Islam as complete system of life the best analogy would be the Borg from star trek. Islam consumes their entire life and it is the ultimate version of the collectivists view without mind altering robotics.

    The individualists are a major threat to the collectivists view. Islam is not

    • The Socialist are siding with Islam because both are trying to destroy freedom in the west, both sides are cynically using the other as a tool to achieve the common goal of world domination.